East Midlands: Public Sector Tenders, Buyers & Winners
ITL-1 UKF·buyer region: where the buying organisation is based·186 authorities bought here in the last 12 months·100% of catalogue notices have a buyer with a known UK region
i
Tenders you can still bid for with work in this region.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed that publish this region as a place of delivery, or the whole UK. The same set the search shows for the region, whoever the buyer is.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How many companies usually bid for a lot here.
The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 1,440 lots from 1,194 competitions, last 36 months. UK-wide middle value: 4. 682 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 4) and 758 from older notices (bids received, middle 7).
i
What a contract here is usually worth.
Middle value of published award values, VAT excluded. Framework ceilings are left out because they are not real contract values.
Based on 5,339 awards with a usable value, last 36 months.
Published values, not actual spend.
i
How much work here goes to companies based in the region.
Contract awards where the winner’s registered address is in this region, out of awards where the address is known.
3,045 of 6,125 awards where the winner’s address is known, last 36 months.
Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.
Newest open tenders
From buyers based in the region · newest first
| Notice | Authority | Deadline | Days left | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bin Permits | West Northamptonshire Council | 18 Nov 2026 | 25d | £440,000 |
| Pre-Paint & Painting Programme | Ashfield District Council | 20 Nov 2026 | 27d | £500,000 |
| SKDC-1689 Leisure Centre General Upgrades | South Kesteven District Council | 27 Nov 2026 | 34d | £400,000 |
See all 733 open tenders deliverable here, UK-wide included →
The East Midlands market
Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire, Leicestershire, Northamptonshire, and Lincolnshire public bodies
The logistics and manufacturing hub of central England. Significant public procurement occurs across logistics corridors (East Midlands Airport / Freeport), regional NHS hospital trusts, and city council social care frameworks.
Main centres: Nottingham · Leicester · Derby · Lincoln · Northampton.
Who buys herei
Which buyers publish the most notices here.
Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.
i
Which buyers publish the most notices here.
Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.
All notices of buyers based in the region · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name · a national body counts where its office is
i
What kinds of public bodies buy here.
Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.
Local authorities60%(6,860 notices)
6,860 of 11,471 notices are Local authorities (60%).Central government18%(2,110 notices)
2,110 of 11,471 notices are Central government (18%).Other public bodies8%(879 notices)
879 of 11,471 notices are Other public bodies (8%).Education & universities6%(689 notices)
689 of 11,471 notices are Education & universities (6%).Police, fire & emergency4%(488 notices)
488 of 11,471 notices are Police, fire & emergency (4%).Not classified4%(445 notices)
445 of 11,471 notices are Not classified (4%).
| Contracting authority | Type | Notices | Last 12 months | Open now |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| West Northamptonshire Council | Local authorities | 1,952 | 515 | 6 |
| Derbyshire County Council | Local authorities | 651 | 232 | 3 |
| Nottingham City Council | Local authorities | 494 | 156 | 9 |
| Leicester City Council | Local authorities | 486 | 148 | 8 |
| NHS Lincolnshire Integrated Care Board | Central government | 423 | 133 | 0 |
| North Northamptonshire Council | Local authorities | 411 | 212 | 5 |
| Leicestershire County Council | Local authorities | 401 | 143 | 11 |
| Lincolnshire County Council | Local authorities | 384 | 123 | 3 |
| Derby City Council | Local authorities | 362 | 133 | 2 |
| Nottinghamshire County Council | Local authorities | 299 | 43 | 6 |
409 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.
What is bought herei
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
i
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
CPV divisions of the notices of buyers in the region · 11,735 of 11,735 carry a CPV code · a notice with several codes counts in each
85 Health & Social Care2,196 notices · 19% · 24 open60 Transport & Passenger Services1,762 notices · 15% · 7 open45 Construction & Civil Engineering1,356 notices · 12% · 26 open79 Business Services & Consultancy853 notices · 7% · 9 open50 Repair & Maintenance543 notices · 5% · 8 open48 Software Packages & ERP518 notices · 4% · 1 open71 Architecture & Engineering498 notices · 4% · 8 open90 Cleaning & Environmental Services484 notices · 4% · 12 open80 Education & Training398 notices · 3% · 5 open72 IT Services & Software395 notices · 3% · 3 openHow it is boughti
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract88%(10,346 notices)
10,346 of 11,735 notices are Contract (88%).Framework10%(1,210 notices)
1,210 of 11,735 notices are Framework (10%).Dynamic purchasing system2%(179 notices)
179 of 11,735 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (2%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Open45%(5,264 notices)
5,264 of 11,735 notices are Open (45%).Limited / restricted20%(2,333 notices)
2,333 of 11,735 notices are Limited / restricted (20%).Route not published16%(1,911 notices)
1,911 of 11,735 notices are Route not published (16%).Direct award12%(1,422 notices)
1,422 of 11,735 notices are Direct award (12%).Selective7%(805 notices)
805 of 11,735 notices are Selective (7%).
i
How much of this market is above the legal threshold.
Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.
Above threshold58%(1,297 notices)
1,297 of 2,223 notices are Above threshold (58%).Below threshold42%(926 notices)
926 of 2,223 notices are Below threshold (42%).
i
How long bidders get to respond.
Middle value in days from the tender notice to its deadline.
Competition
Contracts published in the last 36 months (6,529) · bid counts per lot from award notices · values are net contract awards, framework and DPS ceilings excluded · SME status as declared
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid10%(151)
151 of 1,440 lots fall in 1 bid (10%).2–326%(374)
374 of 1,440 lots fall in 2–3 (26%).4–624%(346)
346 of 1,440 lots fall in 4–6 (24%).7 or more40%(569)
569 of 1,440 lots fall in 7 or more (40%).
i
The usual range of contract values here.
The middle half of published award values, VAT excluded, with the middle value marked. Framework ceilings are left out.
Published values, not actual spend.
i
How many companies usually bid for a lot here.
The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 1,440 lots from 1,194 competitions, last 36 months. UK-wide middle value: 4. 682 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 4) and 758 from older notices (bids received, middle 7).
i
How much of this market is actually put out to competition.
Notices run as an open or selective procedure, out of all notices that say which procedure was used. Direct awards count as not competed.
2,456 of 5,976 notices that state a procedure, last 36 months. 553 more give no procedure and are left out.
i
What share of bids come from small and medium firms.
SME bids divided by all bids, on lots where the buyer published the split.
3,437 SME bids out of 4,920, on 897 lots where the buyer published the split.
i
What share of contracts go to small and medium firms.
Awards to a single supplier that declared its size. SME divided by all.
3,670 of 6,364 awards where the winner declared its size.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.
Based on 581 decided competitions, last 36 months.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
i
Do winners come in above or below the buyer’s estimate.
For each lot we compare the published estimate with the award, like for like. Below means the winner was paid less than estimated, above means more.
Based on 885 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 36 months.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
i
How often a tender ends with no award.
Notices cancelled, withdrawn or marked unsuccessful, plus terminated ones that never got an award.
146 of 6,529 notices, last 36 months.
Only what buyers published. Tenders that quietly went nowhere are not counted.
i
How many companies apply to get onto a framework or DPS here.
Middle value per lot, frameworks and dynamic markets only. Getting onto a panel is not the same as winning work, so it is kept separate.
Based on 999 lots from 296 framework and DPS notices, last 36 months.
Who wins here, and where fromi
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
Two populations, labelled per element: the table ranks suppliers by distinct procedures won (frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems included, all retained years) and shows award records, every single-supplier award on notices of buyers in the region (14,756 awards to 6,641 suppliers). The origin bars and the shares beside them count contract awards of the last 36 months, the five most frequent winners hold 3% of those.
| Supplier | Procedures | Awards | Last 12 months | Buyers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS CARS | 91 | 91 | 20 | 2 |
| R CARS | 87 | 87 | 22 | 2 |
| Skyline Taxis Limited | 87 | 87 | 35 | 2 |
| Ezy Cars | 72 | 72 | 11 | 1 |
| 24x7 Northants Ltd | 67 | 67 | 0 | 1 |
| S CARS | 59 | 59 | 5 | 1 |
| Adams Taxis | 58 | 58 | 2 | 2 |
| Country Lion (Northampton) Ltd | 49 | 49 | 5 | 1 |
All single-supplier awards (frameworks and DPS panel appointments included) across all retained years; the eight most frequent winners shown.
i
How much work here goes to companies based in the region.
Contract awards where the winner’s registered address is in this region, out of awards where the address is known.
3,045 of 6,125 awards where the winner’s address is known, last 36 months.
Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.
Winner’s registered region known for 6,125 of 6,520 contract awards in the last 36 months; the 395 without one are excluded from the bars.
Where to submiti
Where bids for this work are submitted.
Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.
i
Where bids for this work are submitted.
Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.
E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 2,667 of 11,735 notices name one · each portal page explains registration
Open tenders from buyers in East Midlands
Open for bids now, from buyers based in the region · soonest deadline first
All 733 open tenders deliverable in East Midlands, UK-wide notices included →
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- How we count regions. A notice belongs to the region of the organisation that buys: the office address on its buyer profile, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup, and where one organisation published under several accounts, the address of its current profile. Each notice counts once, so the regions add up. A national body counts where its office is, so London includes government departments that buy for the whole country. Where the work is delivered is a separate fact: every tender page shows the place of delivery exactly as the notice publishes it, UK-wide included, and search filters by it. 959 of 213,552 notices come from a buyer without a known UK region and belong to none.
- What counts here. Every notice of a buyer based in East Midlands. To find work you can deliver here, including national notices from buyers elsewhere, search by delivery region. Notices from 2021 to 23 Oct 2026.
- Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
- Won locally. A contract counts as won locally when the winner’s registered address is in the same region. That address is usually a head office, so a national firm with a local branch reads as non-local.
- Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.