ORE Catapult: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Other public bodyScotlandGlasgow

Official UK PPONPYJB-8958-TLYW

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed.

Notices, last 12 months68+172% vs prior 12 months (25)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot414.3% single-bid · 7 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 7 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share11%of 72 awarded procedures · 69 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

72 awarded tenders, 69 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months2311 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published award value, 24m£8.3mnet · on 48 of 69 single-supplier awards · top 5 = 46%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 93 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract 90% (84 notices)
  • Framework 9% (8 notices)
  • Dynamic purchasing system 1% (1 notices)
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award 74% (69 notices)
  • Open 22% (20 notices)
  • Route not published 2% (2 notices)
  • Limited / restricted 1% (1 notices)
  • Selective 1% (1 notices)
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 7 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

4robust · n=714.3% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from deadline to first award notice, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 14 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

51 daysrobust · n=14
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 93 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

018 of 93 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 5 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimaterobust · n=5

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Irton Services Limitedframework/DPS on 234.2%3316 Mar 2026
D HALL RENEWABLES LTD34.2%337 Sept 2026
Datel Computing Limited22.8%2219 Jun 2026
ABB Limited22.8%2216 Oct 2025
JEVINGTON LOGISTICS22.8%2212 Mar 2026
Instituto Sistemas Complejos de Ingenieria22.8%2214 Nov 2025
Teaching Team Leadership22.8%2227 May 2026
HUBSPOT UK HOLDINGS LIMITED22.8%2226 Mar 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 11% of 72 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 69 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards — not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£8.3mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 48 of 69 single-supplier awards; the five largest make 46%; a further 14 published a VAT-inclusive amount only (£31m inc. VAT, kept apart).
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

What one of this buyer’s contracts is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£70k middle valuerobust · n=48Middle half £49k–£162k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Pre-Qualification Test Transformer – High Voltage (HV) SupplyTransVolt Power Solutions17 Sept 20258 mo£1,114,992
IUK Foresighting causing action in year projectSKILLZ MINER LIMITED2 Dec 20253 mo£701,400
RIBA 4 Design ServicesRyder Architecture Limited1 Sept 20264 mo£659,392
Blyth Remedial WorksSouthbay Civil Engineering Ltd8 Jul 20263 mo£649,260
Land Enabling WorksCHAP Group Limited22 Jan 202610 mo£642,522

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published end dates only · 61 of 61 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 23 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 93 procedures on this authority cluster, incl. beneficiary and procuring-entity roles

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Scanning Electron MicroscopeAwarded / complete4 Feb 2026—
PQ Transformer BuildingAccess gatesOpen30 Jan 2026£900,000
Business Travel FrameworkFrameworkTravel agency and similar servicesAwarded / complete15 Jan 2026£3,500,000
LDT Blade SolutionAwarded / complete22 Dec 2025—
PQ Test Replacement Induction CoilsAwarded / complete19 Dec 2025—
Executive Team Leadership JourneyAwarded / complete19 Dec 2025—
IUK Foresighting causing action in year projectAwarded / complete16 Dec 2025—
Ground Investigation WorksAwarded / complete11 Dec 2025—
Turbine ConvertorsAwarded / complete10 Dec 2025—
DSC UpgradeAwarded / complete5 Dec 2025—

Search all 93 procedures for this authority →

Data coverage & method
  • Source: Find a Tender OCDS releases; mixed PCR 2015 / Procurement Act 2023 history — no legal-regime label is applied.
  • Counts are procedures (one notice family), not lots. Authority cluster = canonical buyer plus beneficiary and procuring-entity roles.
  • Published procedure values exist on a minority of notices; their lifetime sum (£3.8m, ceilings stripped) is a catalogue fact, not spend, and is not shown as a headline.
  • Awards on procedures published in the last 24 months: 72 award records on 72 procedures (69 to a single canonical supplier, 3 multi-supplier). 2 values come from the contract record when the award carried none; 14 awards published only a VAT-inclusive amount and are counted but not valued.
  • Bid counts, deadline-to-award, amendments and award-vs-estimate come from the nightly buyer analytics row; each figure’s own method and sample is behind its , the long form on Methodology.
  • Contract end dates: 61 of 61 published contracts carry a period end; 23 end within 18 months, 11 within 6.
  • Never shown: contact details, predicted winners, payment behaviour, or “who to invite”.