North East: Public Sector Tenders, Buyers & Winners
ITL-1 UKC·buyer region: where the buying organisation is based·107 authorities bought here in the last 12 months·100% of catalogue notices have a buyer with a known UK region
i
Tenders you can still bid for with work in this region.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed that publish this region as a place of delivery, or the whole UK. The same set the search shows for the region, whoever the buyer is.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How many companies usually bid for a lot here.
The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 855 lots from 599 competitions, last 36 months. UK-wide middle value: 4. 520 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 4) and 335 from older notices (bids received, middle 4).
i
What a contract here is usually worth.
Middle value of published award values, VAT excluded. Framework ceilings are left out because they are not real contract values.
Based on 3,700 awards with a usable value, last 36 months.
Published values, not actual spend.
i
How much work here goes to companies based in the region.
Contract awards where the winner’s registered address is in this region, out of awards where the address is known.
1,875 of 4,109 awards where the winner’s address is known, last 36 months.
Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.
Newest open tenders
From buyers based in the region · newest first
| Notice | Authority | Deadline | Days left | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-014237 - Medical Assessments and Advisor Reports for Fostering and Kinship Carers | Newcastle City Council | 9 Nov 2026 | 16d | — |
| Alterations and Refurbishment | South Tyneside Council | 13 Nov 2026 | 20d | £81,000 |
| Higham House Groundwork Investigations | Newcastle City Council | 6 Nov 2026 | 13d | £30,000 |
See all 688 open tenders deliverable here, UK-wide included →
The North East market
North East Combined Authority, Newcastle, Sunderland, Gateshead, and Tees Valley
Known for advanced manufacturing, green energy offshore wind supply chains, and public sector collaboration through NEPO (North East Procurement Organisation). Major buyers include Newcastle City Council and regional NHS trusts.
Main centres: Newcastle upon Tyne · Sunderland · Durham · Middlesbrough · Gateshead.
Who buys herei
Which buyers publish the most notices here.
Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.
i
Which buyers publish the most notices here.
Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.
All notices of buyers based in the region · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name · a national body counts where its office is
i
What kinds of public bodies buy here.
Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.
Local authorities52%(3,698 notices)
3,698 of 7,056 notices are Local authorities (52%).Other public bodies16%(1,111 notices)
1,111 of 7,056 notices are Other public bodies (16%).Central government13%(910 notices)
910 of 7,056 notices are Central government (13%).Education & universities8%(533 notices)
533 of 7,056 notices are Education & universities (8%).Police, fire & emergency5%(360 notices)
360 of 7,056 notices are Police, fire & emergency (5%).Not classified6%(444 notices)
444 of 7,056 notices are Not classified (6%).
| Contracting authority | Type | Notices | Last 12 months | Open now |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Durham County Council | Local authorities | 561 | 214 | 10 |
| Newcastle City Council | Local authorities | 484 | 208 | 5 |
| Tees Valley Combined Authority | Local authorities | 346 | 192 | 2 |
| Middlesbrough Council | Local authorities | 315 | 152 | 0 |
| Sunderland City Council | Local authorities | 299 | 135 | 4 |
| Darlington Borough Council | Local authorities | 249 | 134 | 0 |
| Northumberland County Council | Local authorities | 218 | 98 | 6 |
| CENTRE FOR PROCESS INNOVATION LIMITED | Other public bodies | 216 | 81 | 3 |
| Homes England (the name adopted by the Homes and Communities Agency) | Other public bodies | 214 | 109 | 0 |
| Gateshead Council | Local authorities | 204 | 74 | 3 |
274 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.
What is bought herei
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
i
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
CPV divisions of the notices of buyers in the region · 7,633 of 7,635 carry a CPV code · a notice with several codes counts in each
85 Health & Social Care1,373 notices · 18% · 15 open45 Construction & Civil Engineering1,060 notices · 14% · 14 open79 Business Services & Consultancy842 notices · 11% · 13 open72 IT Services & Software462 notices · 6%48 Software Packages & ERP438 notices · 6% · 5 open71 Architecture & Engineering364 notices · 5% · 5 open50 Repair & Maintenance347 notices · 5% · 4 open80 Education & Training256 notices · 3% · 5 open90 Cleaning & Environmental Services235 notices · 3% · 4 open34 Transport Equipment & Vehicles156 notices · 2% · 2 openHow it is boughti
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract83%(6,310 notices)
6,310 of 7,635 notices are Contract (83%).Framework14%(1,086 notices)
1,086 of 7,635 notices are Framework (14%).Dynamic purchasing system3%(239 notices)
239 of 7,635 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (3%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Open38%(2,893 notices)
2,893 of 7,635 notices are Open (38%).Limited / restricted20%(1,561 notices)
1,561 of 7,635 notices are Limited / restricted (20%).Direct award20%(1,504 notices)
1,504 of 7,635 notices are Direct award (20%).Route not published12%(921 notices)
921 of 7,635 notices are Route not published (12%).Selective10%(756 notices)
756 of 7,635 notices are Selective (10%).
i
How much of this market is above the legal threshold.
Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.
Above threshold60%(885 notices)
885 of 1,480 notices are Above threshold (60%).Below threshold40%(595 notices)
595 of 1,480 notices are Below threshold (40%).
i
How long bidders get to respond.
Middle value in days from the tender notice to its deadline.
Competition
Contracts published in the last 36 months (4,505) · bid counts per lot from award notices · values are net contract awards, framework and DPS ceilings excluded · SME status as declared
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid14%(121)
121 of 855 lots fall in 1 bid (14%).2–332%(275)
275 of 855 lots fall in 2–3 (32%).4–634%(288)
288 of 855 lots fall in 4–6 (34%).7 or more20%(171)
171 of 855 lots fall in 7 or more (20%).
i
The usual range of contract values here.
The middle half of published award values, VAT excluded, with the middle value marked. Framework ceilings are left out.
Published values, not actual spend.
i
How many companies usually bid for a lot here.
The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 855 lots from 599 competitions, last 36 months. UK-wide middle value: 4. 520 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 4) and 335 from older notices (bids received, middle 4).
i
How much of this market is actually put out to competition.
Notices run as an open or selective procedure, out of all notices that say which procedure was used. Direct awards count as not competed.
1,491 of 4,277 notices that state a procedure, last 36 months. 228 more give no procedure and are left out.
i
What share of bids come from small and medium firms.
SME bids divided by all bids, on lots where the buyer published the split.
2,206 SME bids out of 3,060, on 658 lots where the buyer published the split.
i
What share of contracts go to small and medium firms.
Awards to a single supplier that declared its size. SME divided by all.
2,302 of 4,444 awards where the winner declared its size.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.
Based on 363 decided competitions, last 36 months.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
i
Do winners come in above or below the buyer’s estimate.
For each lot we compare the published estimate with the award, like for like. Below means the winner was paid less than estimated, above means more.
Based on 517 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 36 months.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
i
How often a tender ends with no award.
Notices cancelled, withdrawn or marked unsuccessful, plus terminated ones that never got an award.
102 of 4,505 notices, last 36 months.
Only what buyers published. Tenders that quietly went nowhere are not counted.
i
How many companies apply to get onto a framework or DPS here.
Middle value per lot, frameworks and dynamic markets only. Getting onto a panel is not the same as winning work, so it is kept separate.
Based on 647 lots from 258 framework and DPS notices, last 36 months.
Who wins here, and where fromi
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
Two populations, labelled per element: the table ranks suppliers by distinct procedures won (frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems included, all retained years) and shows award records, every single-supplier award on notices of buyers in the region (8,686 awards to 4,965 suppliers). The origin bars and the shares beside them count contract awards of the last 36 months, the five most frequent winners hold 4% of those.
| Supplier | Procedures | Awards | Last 12 months | Buyers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Softcat Plc | 29 | 29 | 13 | 14 |
| Ambient People | 22 | 22 | 21 | 1 |
| Home Group Ltd | 19 | 20 | 7 | 11 |
| GO NORTH EAST | 18 | 52 | 43 | 5 |
| Oracle Corporation UK Limited | 18 | 20 | 5 | 7 |
| Humankind Charity | 17 | 20 | 6 | 8 |
| Phoenix Software Ltd | 17 | 17 | 11 | 10 |
| OVE ARUP & PARTNERS LIMITED | 16 | 19 | 6 | 5 |
All single-supplier awards (frameworks and DPS panel appointments included) across all retained years; the eight most frequent winners shown.
i
How much work here goes to companies based in the region.
Contract awards where the winner’s registered address is in this region, out of awards where the address is known.
1,875 of 4,109 awards where the winner’s address is known, last 36 months.
Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.
Winner’s registered region known for 4,109 of 5,004 contract awards in the last 36 months; the 895 without one are excluded from the bars.
Where to submiti
Where bids for this work are submitted.
Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.
i
Where bids for this work are submitted.
Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.
E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 1,959 of 7,635 notices name one · each portal page explains registration
Open tenders from buyers in North East
Open for bids now, from buyers based in the region · soonest deadline first
All 688 open tenders deliverable in North East, UK-wide notices included →
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- How we count regions. A notice belongs to the region of the organisation that buys: the office address on its buyer profile, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup, and where one organisation published under several accounts, the address of its current profile. Each notice counts once, so the regions add up. A national body counts where its office is, so London includes government departments that buy for the whole country. Where the work is delivered is a separate fact: every tender page shows the place of delivery exactly as the notice publishes it, UK-wide included, and search filters by it. 959 of 213,552 notices come from a buyer without a known UK region and belong to none.
- What counts here. Every notice of a buyer based in North East England. To find work you can deliver here, including national notices from buyers elsewhere, search by delivery region. Notices from 2021 to 23 Oct 2026.
- Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
- Won locally. A contract counts as won locally when the winner’s registered address is in the same region. That address is usually a head office, so a national firm with a local branch reads as non-local.
- Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.