Find a TenderOpen for expressions of interest Tender notice
Published 23 Sept 2026, 15:42 BST

Official UK procurement notice

​​A Turnkey Skid Mounted Process for the Synthesis of Polyacrylonitrile PAN​

Authority: CENTRE FOR PROCESS INNOVATION LIMITED (Public body)

Two-stageGoodsCompetitive flexible procedureAbove threshold
Published estimate£1,000,000≈ £333k / year · £1,200,000 inc. VAT
Submission deadline 26 Oct 202612:00 GMT · 29d 13h left
Contract term 3 yrsup to 4 yrs with extensions · starts 25 Jan 2027
Bids per lot · this authority 3division 38 · n=7 · competition analysis ↓

What is being bought

Published requirement description

CPI is seeking first stage tender returns from vendors to inform CPI of vendor capability to provide process technology, design and build of an Acrylonitrile monomer polymerisation process under a NEC4 Engineering and Construction contracting basis and associated NDA.

For more information please see the tender documentation, that is free to access on https://in-tendhost.co.uk/uk-cpi/

  • How the procedure runs: Suppliers are invite to submit stage 1 returns for assessment and is to consist of sufficient information to assess bidder qualification, capability, compliance and outline proposals. The latter stage 2, of which bidders will be invited to participate pending evaluation of submissions to stage 1 return, will focus on the detailed technical and commercial submissions from shortlisted bidders.

CPV: Laboratory, optical and precision equipments (excl. glasses)

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · value published
Lot #1Lot 1Renewal 3 yrsPublished valueAED 1,000,000
Contract period: 25 Jan 2027 — 23 Jan 2030 (3 yrs) · up to 4 yrs with extensionsDelivery: North EastTurnover guideline: ~AED 666,667/yr≈ 2× annual value
Value
AED 1,000,000 exc. VAT · AED 1,200,000 inc. VAT
Extensions
1 additional 12 month extension option
38000000 Laboratory, optical and precision equipments (excl. glasses)

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

What it takes to win
i

How this buyer will score bids.

The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).

Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published — the tender pack may add more
How bids are scored
Quality: 70%Price: 30%
Published sub-criteria (4)
  • Technical Capability — 30%
  • Outline Delivery Approach — 20%
  • Reference Projects — 20%
  • Price — 30%

No conditions of participation were published on the notice; check the tender documents.

Competition analysis · published record, not a forecast of who will bid

How CENTRE FOR PROCESS INNOVATION LIMITED buys Laboratory, optical and precision (CPV 38) — and who usually turns up

CENTRE FOR PROCESS INNOVATION LIMITED’s own published record, next to the North East England market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Laboratory, optical and precision (CPV 38) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Left: this authority. Right: the market where the work is delivered. Bids and award-vs-estimate pairs are per lot, from contested contracts only — direct awards (including PA 2023 transparency notices) report one bid by definition and are left out. On Procurement Act 2023 notices the count is the tenders assessed at the final stage, not every submission received; pairs compare like with like (VAT-exclusive, or VAT-inclusive on both sides). Empty means nothing was published, not filled in from elsewhere.

This authority

CENTRE FOR PROCESS INNOVATION LIMITED

contract notices in 36 months: 7 in division 38 (1 without competition · 1 route not published) · 32 in all categories (7 without competition · 3 route not published)

Bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for work like this.

Middle value of published bid counts, one per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in this industry (CPV 38), last 36 months: 7 lots. All 7 lots are from older notices, which count bids received.

Nothing is filled in from UK-wide numbers. An empty tile means nothing usable was published.

3division 38 · 36m · n=7 lots
Single-bid lots
i

How often only one company bid.

Share of lots that received exactly one bid, on the same competitions as the bids figure.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in this industry (CPV 38), last 36 months: 7 lots.

High means a thin market or an incumbent that is hard to beat.

14%division 38 · 36m · n=7 lots
Award vs estimate
i

Do awards for work like this land above or below the estimate.

Estimate against award per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 36 months: 4 pairs.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

at estimateall categories · 36m · n=4 pairs
Deadline → award date
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 36 months: 4 notices.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

87dall categories · 36m · n=4 notices
Notice updates
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 24 months: 107 notices.

Last 24 months.

0all categories · 24m · n=107 notices
Awarded without competition
i

How often this buyer awards without a competition.

Direct or limited awards as a share of its notices that say which procedure was used. These routes are legal in defined cases. This is just the record.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in this industry (CPV 38), last 36 months: 6 notices.

Last 36 months.

17%division 38 · 36m · n=6 notices
Bids per lot robust · n=7
i

How the number of bidders is spread across lots.

Each lot with a published bid count is put in a band: one bid, two to three, four to six, seven or more. Real competitions only.

Based on 7 lots on 2 contested notices · division 38, last 36 months.

  • 1 bid 14%
  • 2–3 71%
  • 4–6 0%
  • 7+ 14%

Middle value 3 · 7 lots on 2 contested notices · division 38.

Winning award vs estimate moderate · n=4
i

How often winners come in below, near or above the estimate.

Each lot with both an estimate and an award is placed by how far the award sat from the estimate.

Based on 4 lot pairs · all categories, last 36 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

  • Below estimate 25%
  • Within ±2% 75%
  • Above estimate 0%

4 lot pairs · all categories.

The market · delivery region

North East England · Laboratory, optical and precision (CPV 38)

contract notices delivered in North East England in 36 months: 51 in division 38 (27 competed, 9 route not published)

Bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for work like this.

Middle value of published bid counts, one per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 38), last 36 months: 9 lots. 4 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 2) and 5 from older notices (bids received, middle 3).

Nothing is filled in from UK-wide numbers. An empty tile means nothing usable was published.

3division 38 · 36m · n=9 lots
Single-bid lots
i

How often only one company bid.

Share of lots that received exactly one bid, on the same competitions as the bids figure.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 38), last 36 months: 9 lots.

High means a thin market or an incumbent that is hard to beat.

33%division 38 · 36m · n=9 lots
Award vs estimate
i

Do awards for work like this land above or below the estimate.

Estimate against award per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 38), last 36 months: 3 pairs.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

at estimatedivision 38 · 36m · n=3 pairs
Deadline → award date
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 38), last 36 months: 6 notices.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

54ddivision 38 · 36m · n=6 notices
SME bidders
i

How much of this market goes to small and medium firms.

SME bidders where buyers published the split, otherwise SME winners.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 38), last 36 months: 6 lots.

Last 36 months.

50%division 38 · 36m · n=6 lots
Winners based in the region
i

How much work like this goes to companies based in the delivery region.

Awards in this category delivered here where the winner’s registered address is in the region.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 38), last 36 months: 20 awards.

Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.

Last 36 months.

50%division 38 · 36m · n=20 awards
Bids per lot robust · n=9
i

How the number of bidders is spread across lots.

Each lot with a published bid count is put in a band: one bid, two to three, four to six, seven or more. Real competitions only.

Based on 9 lots on 9 contested notices · division 38, last 36 months.

  • 1 bid 33%
  • 2–3 44%
  • 4–6 22%
  • 7+ 0%

Middle value 3 · 9 lots on 9 contested notices · division 38.

Winning award vs estimate moderate · n=3
i

How often winners come in below, near or above the estimate.

Each lot with both an estimate and an award is placed by how far the award sat from the estimate.

Based on 3 lot pairs · division 38, last 36 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

  • Below estimate 0%
  • Within ±2% 67%
  • Above estimate 33%

3 lot pairs · division 38.

moderate · n=4
i

Where this tender’s estimate would land if the usual pattern repeats.

We apply the buyer’s usual movement between estimate and award (or the region’s) to the estimate on this notice.

Based on 4 lots, so only the direction is shown, not a pound figure.

A benchmark, not a price to bid.

The middle award in CENTRE FOR PROCESS INNOVATION LIMITED (all categories, n=4 pairs) lands at estimate. Too few pairs to turn into a pound figure with any confidence — read the percentage as a rough direction, not this notice’s estimate converted.
2

Who you are likely to meet
i

Who you may be up against.

Suppliers on this buyer’s earlier similar contracts, and suppliers whose record fits this tender.

A guess from the record. Buyers do not publish who is bidding.

Suppliers on this authority’s earlier similar contracts, then suppliers with a matching track record — from published award history, not a bid list

Suppliers with a similar track record — and how they price
i

Suppliers with a similar track record, and how they price.

Suppliers matched on wins in this category, history with this buyer, location and size. Their award vs estimate is from their own past wins.

A guess from the record, not a bidder list.

SupplierEvidenceLast awardTheir award vs estimateRelevance
Infors UK Ltd SME6 class wins · 6 lots for this buyer18 months agono comparable pairs65%
Heinrich Frings GmbH & Co. KG SME3 class wins · 3 lots for this buyer44 months agono comparable pairs61%
North England Laboratory Supplies SME5 class wins · 24 lots for this buyer1 months agono comparable pairs60%
Sartorius Stedim UK Ltd SME8 class wins · 8 lots for this buyer4 months agono comparable pairs58%
SciQuip Ltd SME15 class wins · 7 lots for this buyerthis month41% below n=154%

Matched by the nightly worker on class wins, buyer history, delivery geography, scale and notice text; relevance is a 0–100% heuristic score, not a probability of bidding. “Their award vs estimate” is that supplier’s middle value on its own comparable single-supplier wins. Nobody here is known to be bidding.

Coverage and what to read with care
  • Each tile explains itself. The on a figure says what it is, how it is counted and which scope this notice’s own record came from (class, division, all categories, or the authority’s 24-month row). The two columns are never blended and nothing is filled from a UK-wide figure; an empty tile means the source published nothing usable. Long form: Methodology.
  • Coverage. Roughly 40 % of notices publish a bid count; about half publish an ITL1 delivery location, so the market column reads the authority’s registered region when the notice has none (labelled). About 30 % of award-vs-estimate pairs are exact matches — the buyer published the award at the estimate. n is on every figure; a thin sample is muted, never hidden.
  • “Match” and “relevance” are model scores from the nightly matcher, not published facts. Find a Tender does not publish who is bidding. Never shown: contact details, payment behaviour, or a recommended price.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Procedure method
Competitive flexible procedure
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Goods
Notice status
Open for expressions of interest
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
No (one-off requirement)
First published
23 Sept 2026, 15:42 BST
Last source update
23 Sept 2026, 15:42 BST
Award evaluation window
Submission end — 25 Jan 2027, 23:59 GMT
Authority reference
3948
Latest notice
Tender notice (UK4)
Classification (CPV)
Laboratory, optical and precision equipments (excl. glasses)
Delivery area
North East (UKC1)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-0778e0 Find a Tender
Contract terms summary
30 Days - Monthly Valuations as per NEC4
How it runs
Suppliers are invite to submit stage 1 returns for assessment and is to consist of sufficient information to assess bidder qualification, capability, compliance and outline proposals. The latter stage 2, of which bidders will be invited to participate pending evaluation of submissions to stage 1 return, will focus on the detailed technical and commercial submissions from shortlisted bidders.

How to participate & submission route

Official notice Submit via In-tend
Submission portal named on this notice: In-tend · Who buys & how to bid on In-tend
Supplier login requiredElectronic submission allowedLanguage: EN
Access & registration note: Free · one account per buying organisation's portal · reCAPTCHA on signup
Expression of interest (EOI)
26 Oct 2026, 12:00 GMT
Tender submission deadline
26 Oct 2026, 12:00 GMT
Clarification deadline
—
Submission channel
Official e-sourcing portal
Electronic submission
Allowed
Accepted languages
en
Detailed submission instructions & authority contactsFrom official release
Published estimate £1,000,000 excludes VAT (£1,200,000 including VAT).

Timeline

5 published dates · Europe/London
  1. Tender notice published3 days ago
    23 Sept 2026, 15:42 BST
  2. Expressions of interest byin 30 days
    26 Oct 2026, 12:00 GMT
  3. Submission deadlinein 30 days
    26 Oct 2026, 12:00 GMT
  4. Contract startsin 120 days
    25 Jan 2027, 00:00 GMT
  5. Award decision expected byin 121 days
    25 Jan 2027, 23:59 GMT

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Nothing awarded yet
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Tender notice published
    23 Sept 2026, 15:42 BSTUK4

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

CENTRE FOR PROCESS INNOVATION LIMITED

Contracting authorityPublic undertaking GB-COH: 05002194 Wilton Centre, Redcar, North East, TS10 4RF [email protected]

Official documents & specifications (3)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Tender pack and attachments

Notices published for this procedure

  • Tender notice tenderTender noticeUK4Tender notice on Find a Tender