Find a TenderOpen for tender Tender notice
Published 25 Sept 2026, 09:15 BST

Official UK procurement notice

003271 - Online Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) application provider

Authority: Durham County Council (Local council)

GoodsOpen procedureAbove thresholdSME suitableVCSE suitable
Final published estimate£1,250,000initial estimate £1,200,000 · 1 value update
Submission deadline 29 Oct 202610:00 GMT · 33d 23h left
Clarification cut-off 23 Oct 202610:00 BST · questions to the authority
Contract term 3 yrsup to 5 yrs with extensions · starts 1 Apr 2027
Bids per lot · this authority 2division 48 · n=6 · competition analysis ↓

What is being bought

Published requirement description

DCC undertakes DBS checks on all employees in posts identified as requiring a DBS check in accordance with the DBS eligibility criteria; plus DBS checks for carers, fostering, adoption, taxi drivers, volunteers and maintained schools, amongst others. Checks ensure full compliance with recruitment processes, as well as statutory requirements. The Council also operates a rechecking process for employees, currently set at 5 years.

We are seeking to formally procure the services of a DBS umbrella registered body, who will provide an electronic administration platform for the submission of DBS application forms and for the subsequent check results to be visible to users within DCC (E-Bulk System).

We anticipate a requirement to process approximately 5,000 DBS applications per year for the Council. However, it should be noted that the number of applications processed may be subject to fluctuation due to organisational change, renewals required and policy decisions arising from national changes to disclosure and barring eligibility criteria. For avoidance of doubt, the spread of applications will not be uniform across any period.

CPV: Software package and information systems

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · value published
Lot #1Lot 1Renewal 3 yrsSMEVCSEPublished value£1,250,000
Contract period: 1 Apr 2027 — 31 Mar 2030 (3 yrs) · up to 5 yrs with extensionsEligibility: SME eligibleVCSE eligibleDelivery: North EastTurnover guideline: ~£832,573/yr≈ 2× annual value
Value
£1,250,000 exc. VAT · £1,500,000 inc. VAT
Extensions
We anticipate a requirement to process approximately 5,000 DBS applications per year for the Council. However, it should be noted that the number of applications processed may be subject to fluctuation due to organisational change, renewals required and policy decisions arising from national changes to disclosure and barring eligibility criteria. This may lead to an increase in contract value. · The Contract period more…is for an initial 3-year period, with the option to extend for a further 2 years subject to satisfactory performance and the Council's future requirements.
48000000 Software package and information systems

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

What it takes to win
i

How this buyer will score bids.

The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).

Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published — the tender pack may add more
How bids are scored
Quality: 35%Price: 65%
Published sub-criteria (6)
  • Service delivery model and end-to-end DBS processing — 10%
  • Advice, guidance and helpdesk support — 5%
  • Contract Mobilisation — 5%
  • System Demonstration — 10%
  • Desirable System Functionality — 5%
  • Price - Administration charge per application — 65%
Published award criteria (6)
  • Price - Administration charge per application — Please note, the administration charge excludes the statutory DBS certificate fees, however statutory fees are included in the contract value. The administration charge must include all costs for the requirements in the specification. No additional payment will be made in addition to the fixed administration charge per application.
Conditions of participation1
  • Technical & professional ability
    Confirm that your organisation is an approved DBS umbrella body / registered body authorised to provide e-bulk services and countersignatory services for the types of checks required under this contract.

Competition analysis · published record, not a forecast of who will bid

How Durham County Council buys Software package and information systems (CPV 48) — and who usually turns up

Durham County Council’s own published record, next to the North East England market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Software package and information systems (CPV 48) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Left: this authority. Right: the market where the work is delivered. Bids and award-vs-estimate pairs are per lot, from contested contracts only — direct awards (including PA 2023 transparency notices) report one bid by definition and are left out. On Procurement Act 2023 notices the count is the tenders assessed at the final stage, not every submission received; pairs compare like with like (VAT-exclusive, or VAT-inclusive on both sides). Empty means nothing was published, not filled in from elsewhere.

This authority

Durham County Council

contract notices in 36 months: 24 in division 48 (1 without competition · 15 route not published) · 159 in all categories (24 without competition · 42 route not published)

Bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for work like this.

Middle value of published bid counts, one per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in this industry (CPV 48), last 36 months: 6 lots. 3 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 2) and 3 from older notices (bids received, middle 3).

Nothing is filled in from UK-wide numbers. An empty tile means nothing usable was published.

2division 48 · 36m · n=6 lots
Single-bid lots
i

How often only one company bid.

Share of lots that received exactly one bid, on the same competitions as the bids figure.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in this industry (CPV 48), last 36 months: 6 lots.

High means a thin market or an incumbent that is hard to beat.

17%division 48 · 36m · n=6 lots
Award vs estimate
i

Do awards for work like this land above or below the estimate.

Estimate against award per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in this industry (CPV 48), last 36 months: 4 pairs.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

3% abovedivision 48 · 36m · n=4 pairs
Deadline → award date
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in this industry (CPV 48), last 36 months: 3 notices.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

42ddivision 48 · 36m · n=3 notices
Notice updates
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 24 months: 404 notices.

Last 24 months.

0all categories · 24m · n=404 notices
Awarded without competition
i

How often this buyer awards without a competition.

Direct or limited awards as a share of its notices that say which procedure was used. These routes are legal in defined cases. This is just the record.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in this industry (CPV 48), last 36 months: 9 notices.

Last 36 months.

11%division 48 · 36m · n=9 notices
Bids per lot robust · n=6
i

How the number of bidders is spread across lots.

Each lot with a published bid count is put in a band: one bid, two to three, four to six, seven or more. Real competitions only.

Based on 6 lots on 6 contested notices · division 48, last 36 months.

  • 1 bid 17%
  • 2–3 67%
  • 4–6 17%
  • 7+ 0%

Median 2 · 6 lots on 6 contested notices · division 48.

Winning award vs estimate moderate · n=4
i

How often winners come in below, near or above the estimate.

Each lot with both an estimate and an award is placed by how far the award sat from the estimate.

Based on 4 lot pairs · division 48, last 36 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

  • Below estimate 25%
  • Within ±2% 25%
  • Above estimate 50%

4 lot pairs · division 48.

The market · delivery region

North East England · Software package and information systems (CPV 48)

contract notices delivered in North East England in 36 months: 407 in division 48 (159 competed, 101 route not published)

Bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for work like this.

Middle value of published bid counts, one per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 48), last 36 months: 68 lots. 40 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 3) and 28 from older notices (bids received, middle 4).

Nothing is filled in from UK-wide numbers. An empty tile means nothing usable was published.

3.5division 48 · 36m · n=68 lots
Single-bid lots
i

How often only one company bid.

Share of lots that received exactly one bid, on the same competitions as the bids figure.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 48), last 36 months: 68 lots.

High means a thin market or an incumbent that is hard to beat.

10%division 48 · 36m · n=68 lots
Award vs estimate
i

Do awards for work like this land above or below the estimate.

Estimate against award per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 48), last 36 months: 37 pairs.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

7% belowdivision 48 · 36m · n=37 pairs
Deadline → award date
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 48), last 36 months: 50 notices.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

53ddivision 48 · 36m · n=50 notices
SME bidders
i

How much of this market goes to small and medium firms.

SME bidders where buyers published the split, otherwise SME winners.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 48), last 36 months: 50 lots.

Last 36 months.

42%division 48 · 36m · n=50 lots
Winners based in the region
i

How much work like this goes to companies based in the delivery region.

Awards in this category delivered here where the winner’s registered address is in the region.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 48), last 36 months: 175 awards.

Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.

Last 36 months.

52%division 48 · 36m · n=175 awards
Bids per lot robust · n=68
i

How the number of bidders is spread across lots.

Each lot with a published bid count is put in a band: one bid, two to three, four to six, seven or more. Real competitions only.

Based on 68 lots on 65 contested notices · division 48, last 36 months.

  • 1 bid 10%
  • 2–3 40%
  • 4–6 28%
  • 7+ 22%

Median 3.5 · 68 lots on 65 contested notices · division 48.

Winning award vs estimate robust · n=37
i

How often winners come in below, near or above the estimate.

Each lot with both an estimate and an award is placed by how far the award sat from the estimate.

Based on 37 lot pairs · division 48, last 36 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

  • Below estimate 54%
  • Within ±2% 24%
  • Above estimate 22%

37 lot pairs · division 48.

moderate · n=4
i

Where this tender’s estimate would land if the usual pattern repeats.

We apply the buyer’s usual movement between estimate and award (or the region’s) to the estimate on this notice.

Based on 4 lots, so only the direction is shown, not a pound figure.

A benchmark, not a price to bid.

Awards in Durham County Council (division 48, n=4 pairs) land a median 3% above. Too few pairs to turn into a pound figure with any confidence — read the percentage as a rough direction, not this notice’s estimate converted.
2

Who you are likely to meet
i

Who you may be up against.

Suppliers on this buyer’s earlier similar contracts, and suppliers whose record fits this tender.

A guess from the record. Buyers do not publish who is bidding.

Suppliers on this authority’s earlier similar contracts, then suppliers with a matching track record — from published award history, not a bid list

Suppliers with a similar track record — and how they price
i

Suppliers with a similar track record, and how they price.

Suppliers matched on wins in this category, history with this buyer, location and size. Their award vs estimate is from their own past wins.

A guess from the record, not a bidder list.

SupplierEvidenceLast awardTheir award vs estimateRelevance
Unite Procurement Uk Ltd Large1 class wins · 34 lots for this buyerthis monthno comparable pairs54%
CIVICA UK LIMITED 50 class wins · 4 lots for this buyerthis monthno comparable pairs52%
NEC SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS UK LIMITED Large29 class wins · 2 lots for this buyer1 months agono comparable pairs51%
CONCERTO SUPPORT SERVICES LIMITED 6 class winsthis monthno comparable pairs51%
ACCESS UK LTD 25 class wins · 3 lots for this buyerthis monthno comparable pairs50%

Matched by the nightly worker on class wins, buyer history, delivery geography, scale and notice text; relevance is a 0–100% heuristic score, not a probability of bidding. “Their award vs estimate” is that supplier’s median on its own comparable single-supplier wins. Nobody here is known to be bidding.

Coverage and what to read with care
  • Each tile explains itself. The on a figure says what it is, how it is counted and which scope this notice’s own record came from (class, division, all categories, or the authority’s 24-month row). The two columns are never blended and nothing is filled from a UK-wide figure; an empty tile means the source published nothing usable. Long form: Methodology.
  • Coverage. Roughly 40 % of notices publish a bid count; about half publish an ITL1 delivery location, so the market column reads the authority’s registered region when the notice has none (labelled). About 30 % of award-vs-estimate pairs are exact matches — the buyer published the award at the estimate. n is on every figure; a thin sample is muted, never hidden.
  • “Match” and “relevance” are model scores from the nightly matcher, not published facts. Find a Tender does not publish who is bidding. Never shown: contact details, payment behaviour, or a recommended price.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Procedure method
Open procedure
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Goods
Notice status
Open for tender
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
No (one-off requirement)
First published
25 Sept 2026, 09:15 BST
Last source update
25 Sept 2026, 09:15 BST
Award evaluation window
Submission end — 24 Nov 2026, 23:59 GMT
Authority reference
OPEN20261396
Latest notice
Tender notice (UK4)
Classification (CPV)
Software package and information systems
Delivery area
North East (UKC14)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-069b6c Find a Tender

How to participate & submission route

Official notice
Expression of interest (EOI)
—
Tender submission deadline
29 Oct 2026, 10:00 GMT
Clarification deadline
23 Oct 2026, 10:00 BST
Electronic submission
Allowed
Accepted languages
en
Detailed submission instructions & authority contactsFrom official release
Full tender documents can be accessed free of charge at www.open-uk.org ↗ Reference: OPEN20261396 Submission and clarification questions must be made via the Open Portal.
Published estimate £1,250,000 excludes VAT (£1,500,000 including VAT).

Timeline

7 published dates · Europe/London
  1. Planning notice published130 days ago
    18 May 2026, 18:46 BST
  2. Market engagement115 days ago
    1 Jun 2026, 23:59 BSTThis notice forms part of our preliminary market engagement, offering you the opportunity to share feedback and comments before the opportunity is released for formal tender submissions. Interested providers can access the written response questions, free of charge, by registering on the Open Portal at www.open-uk.org ↗
  3. Tender notice publishedearlier today
    25 Sept 2026, 09:15 BST
  4. Clarification questions byin 28 days
    23 Oct 2026, 10:00 BST
  5. Submission deadlinein 34 days
    29 Oct 2026, 10:00 GMT
  6. Award decision expected byin 61 days
    24 Nov 2026, 23:59 GMT
  7. Contract startsin 188 days
    1 Apr 2027, 00:00 BST

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Nothing awarded yet
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Notice history

6 events · 2 releases on Find a Tender · since 18 May 2026
  1. Tender notice published
    25 Sept 2026, 09:15 BSTUK4
  2. Published value updated to £1,250,000
    25 Sept 2026, 09:15 BSTwas £1,200,000
  3. Status changed to active
    25 Sept 2026, 09:15 BST
  4. Procurement method changed
    25 Sept 2026, 09:15 BST
  5. Deadline published: 29 Oct 2026, 10:00 GMT
    25 Sept 2026, 09:15 BST
  6. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    18 May 2026, 18:46 BSTUK2

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Durham County Council

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-PPON: PMPB-8772-VYWM Corten House, Dunholme Close, Durham, North East, DH1 5WB

Official documents & specifications (3)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Tender pack and attachments

  • Conflict of interest declarationtenderConflict of interest declarationNot published

Notices published for this procedure