University of Lincoln: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

DfE school register: Higher education institutionsEducationEast MidlandsLincoln

Official UK PPONPGYJ-5468-QTPJ

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed.

Notices, last 12 months23+475% vs prior 12 months (4)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot50% single-bid · 3 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share9%of 34 awarded procedures · 36 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

34 awarded tenders, 36 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months61 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published award value, 24m£9.0mnet · on 11 of 26 single-supplier awards · top 5 = 94%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 27 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract 96% (26 notices)
  • Dynamic purchasing system 4% (1 notices)
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award 41% (11 notices)
  • Route not published 19% (5 notices)
  • Limited / restricted 15% (4 notices)
  • Open 15% (4 notices)
  • Selective 11% (3 notices)
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

5moderate · n=30% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 27 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

06 of 27 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 3 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

16.7% below estimatemoderate · n=3

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Shakespeare Martineau LLP38.8%1316 Jun 2026
Veale Wasbrough Vizards LLP25.9%029 Jun 2021
Penningtons Manches Cooper LLP25.9%029 Jun 2021
Pinsent Masons LLP25.9%029 Jun 2021
Birketts LLP25.9%029 Jun 2021
Acorn Analytical Services12.9%112 Oct 2025
GUARDIAN HYGIENE SERVICES LIMITED12.9%119 Jun 2026
Maris Interiors LLP12.9%116 Aug 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 9% of 34 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 36 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards — not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£9.0mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 11 of 26 single-supplier awards; the five largest make 94%; a further 15 published a VAT-inclusive amount only (£3.2m inc. VAT, kept apart).
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

What one of this buyer’s contracts is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£139k middle valuerobust · n=11Middle half £105k–£313k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Digital Technology Equipment SupplyXMA Limited——£7,000,000 †
Riseholme Shuttle Bus ServiceP.C.Coaches of Lincoln Ltd——£500,000 †
Sorption Analysis SuiteHiden Isochema Limited——£350,000 †
Remote Access to Academic ApplicationsAppsAnywhere Limited7 Nov 20253 yrs£275,484
≈ £92k/yr
Student Counselling ServiceHealth Assured—3 yrs£265,500 †
≈ £89k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published end dates only · 22 of 33 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 35 of 35 procedures on this authority cluster, incl. beneficiary and procuring-entity roles

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
491 Internal Audit ServicesAuditing servicesAwarded / complete18 Sept 2026£600,000
Student Counselling ServiceAwarded / complete9 Sept 2026—
Consumable ProductsAwarded / complete7 Aug 2026—
Refurbishment works to David Chiddick BuildingAwarded / complete6 Aug 2026—
Online Learning PlatformAwarded / complete24 Jul 2026—
E-Payment ServicesAwarded / complete9 Jul 2026—
Motion Capture CameraAwarded / complete1 Jul 2026—
Lecture Capture SoftwareAwarded / complete23 Jun 2026—
Legal ServicesAwarded / complete17 Jun 2026—
Legal ServicesAwarded / complete16 Jun 2026—
Flushing of Little Used Water OutletsAwarded / complete9 Jun 2026—
491 Internal Audit ServicesAuditing servicesCancelled29 May 2026£600,000
Equipment Purchase - DSC2500 and TGA55Awarded / complete9 Apr 2026—
Dentistry (Ross Lucas) Consumables & Residual EquipmentAwarded / complete11 Mar 2026—
External Audit ServicesDPSAuditing servicesAwarded / complete6 Mar 2026£800,000
Sleep Laboratory Monitoring EquipmentAwarded / complete2 Feb 2026—
Medical Task TrainersAwarded / complete14 Jan 2026—
Portable and Handheld Ultrasound EquipmentAwarded / complete13 Jan 2026—
Anatomy TablesAwarded / complete23 Dec 2025—
Remote Access to Academic ApplicationsAwarded / complete20 Nov 2025—

Search all 35 procedures for this authority →

Data coverage & method
  • Source: Find a Tender OCDS releases; mixed PCR 2015 / Procurement Act 2023 history — no legal-regime label is applied.
  • Counts are procedures (one notice family), not lots. Authority cluster = canonical buyer plus beneficiary and procuring-entity roles.
  • Published procedure values exist on a minority of notices; their lifetime sum (£10m, ceilings stripped) is a catalogue fact, not spend, and is not shown as a headline.
  • Awards on procedures published in the last 24 months: 26 award records on 26 procedures (26 to a single canonical supplier, 0 multi-supplier). 10 values come from the contract record when the award carried none; 15 awards published only a VAT-inclusive amount and are counted but not valued.
  • Bid counts, deadline-to-award, amendments and award-vs-estimate come from the nightly buyer analytics row; each figure’s own method and sample is behind its , the long form on Methodology.
  • Contract end dates: 22 of 33 published contracts carry a period end; 6 end within 18 months, 1 within 6.
  • Never shown: contact details, predicted winners, payment behaviour, or “who to invite”.
Identifiers consolidated into this page (8 historical Find a Tender publication identifiers)

Official notices referenced this authority under these publication identifiers. Alias URLs are not separate pages.

GB-FTS-102311GB-FTS-125124GB-FTS-132637GB-FTS-27195GB-FTS-44294GB-FTS-58660GB-FTS-59531GB-FTS-7804

Canonical page id: GB-PPON-PGYJ-5468-QTPJ