North Tyneside Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY·ONS register: Local-authority-district·Social housing register: Local authority·NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACY·Local authority·North East England·Newcastle upon Tyne
Find a Tender organisation id179781Websitenorthtyneside.gov.uk ↗
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.
Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.
44 awarded tenders, 145 different suppliers.
Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.
What they buyi
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
i
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each
45 Construction work3 procedures · 27%85 Health and social work services3 procedures · 27%90 Sewage, refuse, cleaning and environmental2 procedures · 18%71 Architectural, construction, engineering1 procedures · 9%72 IT services: consulting, software, internet1 procedures · 9%73 Research and development services1 procedures · 9%77 Agricultural, forestry, horticultural services1 procedures · 9%92 Recreational, cultural and sporting1 procedures · 9%How they buyi
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Last 24 months · 11 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
- Contract 55% (6 notices)
- Dynamic purchasing system 36% (4 notices)
- Framework 9% (1 notices)
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
- Open 73% (8 notices)
- Selective 27% (3 notices)
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on 11 notices across all categories, last 24 months.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JT Dove Ltd | 4 | 9.1% | 0 | 12 | 18 Sept 2024 |
| NE&C Windows and Doors Limited | 3 | 6.8% | 3 | 3 | 11 Jun 2026 |
| Denham Procurement & Sourcing Solutions Ltd | 2 | 4.5% | 0 | 4 | 29 Jun 2021 |
| Crossling Limited | 2 | 4.5% | 0 | 3 | 25 Jun 2021 |
| Sunbelt Rentals Ltd | 2 | 4.5% | 0 | 2 | 20 Jun 2023 |
| Comfort Call Ltd | 1 | 2.3% | 1 | 1 | 19 Feb 2025 |
| Dale Care Limited | 1 | 2.3% | 1 | 1 | 19 Feb 2025 |
| Durham Tees Care | 1 | 2.3% | 1 | 1 | 19 Feb 2025 |
The three most frequent suppliers are named on 16% of 44 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 145 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards — not a statement of preference.
Recent procedures
Latest 50 of 92 procedures on this authority cluster, incl. beneficiary and procuring-entity roles
Data coverage & method
- Source: Find a Tender OCDS releases; mixed PCR 2015 / Procurement Act 2023 history — no legal-regime label is applied.
- Counts are procedures (one notice family), not lots. Authority cluster = canonical buyer plus beneficiary and procuring-entity roles.
- Published procedure values exist on a minority of notices; their lifetime sum (£21m, ceilings stripped) is a catalogue fact, not spend, and is not shown as a headline.
- Awards on procedures published in the last 24 months: 4 award records on 4 procedures (3 to a single canonical supplier, 1 multi-supplier). 0 values come from the contract record when the award carried none.
- Bid counts, deadline-to-award, amendments and award-vs-estimate come from the nightly buyer analytics row; each figure’s own method and sample is behind its , the long form on Methodology.
- Contract end dates: 7 of 134 published contracts carry a period end; 0 end within 18 months, 0 within 6.
- Never shown: contact details, predicted winners, payment behaviour, or “who to invite”.
Identifiers consolidated into this page (15 historical Find a Tender publication identifiers)
Official notices referenced this authority under these publication identifiers. Alias URLs are not separate pages.
Canonical page id: GB-FTS-179781