Development Bank of Wales: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Central governmentWales (Cymru)Cardiff

Official UK PPONPCWM-6438-QYVPWebsitedevelopmentbank.wales ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months15+150% vs prior 12 months (6)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot614.3% single-bid · 7 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 7 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share17%of 29 awarded procedures · 49 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

29 awarded tenders, 49 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months1811 within 6 months · 3 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£9.4mnet · on 14 of 14 published values · top 5 = 93%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 21 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract90%(19 notices)
    19 of 21 notices are Contract (90%).
  • Framework10%(2 notices)
    2 of 21 notices are Framework (10%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open48%(10 notices)
    10 of 21 notices are Open (48%).
  • Direct award38%(8 notices)
    8 of 21 notices are Direct award (38%).
  • Limited / restricted5%(1 notices)
    1 of 21 notices are Limited / restricted (5%).
  • Selective5%(1 notices)
    1 of 21 notices are Selective (5%).
  • Route not published5%(1 notices)
    1 of 21 notices are Route not published (5%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 7 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

6robust · n=714.3% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 7 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

28 daysrobust · n=7
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 21 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

09 of 21 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 5 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimaterobust · n=5

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
VisVira Ltd310.3%3325 May 2026
Generative AI Strategy B.V26.9%2216 Mar 2026
Geldards LLPframework/DPS on 126.9%04—
CAPITAL LAW LIMITEDframework/DPS on 126.9%03—
Hugh Jamesframework/DPS on 126.9%03—
BERRY SMITH LLPframework/DPS on 126.9%02—
GRANT THORNTON UK ADVISORY & TAX LLP13.4%1119 Oct 2026
Azets Holdings Limited13.4%1112 Feb 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 17% of 29 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 49 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£9.4mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 14 of 14 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 93%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£113k middle valuerobust · n=14Middle half £50k–£1.2m.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
External Auditor ServicesMazars LLP——£3,350,000 †
The Provision of a Loan Administration SystemPancredit Systems Ltd1 Jun 20265 yrs · up to 10 yrs£2,202,930
≈ £441k/yr
The Provision of Credit Referencing ServicesExperian Limited30 Mar 20264 yrs · up to 10.3 yrs£1,506,839
≈ £377k/yr
IT Security ServicesWavenet7 Jul 20255 yrs · up to 8 yrs£1,500,000
≈ £300k/yr
Pay and Benefits reviewMercer11 Dec 20253 yrs · up to 6 yrs£180,000
≈ £60k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

38 of 38 contracts carry an end date, 17 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 18 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 34 of 34 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
External Auditor Servicescentral purchasing bodyAuditing servicesAwarded / complete4 Mar 2025—
The Provision of Tax Services to the Development Bank of Walescentral purchasing bodyTax consultancy servicesAwarded / complete5 Feb 2025£600,000
The Provision of Legal Services to the Teesside Flexible Investment Fundcentral purchasing bodyLegal advisory and information servicesAwarded / complete22 Jan 2025£310,000
The Provision of a Risk Management SystemIndustry specific software packageAwarded / complete22 Jan 2025£300,000
The Provision of an Online Training Toolcentral purchasing bodyIT software packageAwarded / complete22 Jan 2025£145,000
Property Legal Services3 lotsLegal advisory servicesAwarded / complete5 Dec 2024£5,000,000
IT Security Servicescentral purchasing bodyInformation technology servicesPlanned2 Sept 2024£1,000,000
The Provision of Internal Audit Services to the Development Bank of Walescentral purchasing bodyAccounting and auditing servicesAwarded / complete13 Aug 2024£400,000
The Provision of Valuation Services to The Development Bank of Wales Groupcentral purchasing body3 lotsResidential property servicesAwarded / complete21 Jun 2024£400,000
Help to Buy Wales - Loan Administration Systemcentral purchasing bodyInformation technology servicesAwarded / complete8 Nov 2023£3,000,000
Framework Agreement for the provision of legal services to the Development Bank of WalesFrameworkcentral purchasing body4 lotsLegal servicesAwarded / complete6 Oct 2023£12,500,000
RICS Surveyor and Valuer Panelcentral purchasing body4 lotsResidential property servicesPlanned1 Aug 2023£400,000
The provision of Office Fit Out Servicescentral purchasing bodyBuilding construction workAwarded / complete23 Aug 2021£900,000
Consultancy Services to the Wales Self Build Fundcentral purchasing body4 lotsResidential property servicesOpen26 Jul 2021£1,000,000

Search all 34 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 38 of 38 published contracts have an end date; 17 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.