The Royal Parks Ltd: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
Companies House: PRI/LTD BY GUAR/NSC (Private, limited by guarantee, no share capital)·GOV.UK register: Public corporation·Other public body·Greater London·London
Official UK PPONPRNG-7762-JCRY
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.
i
How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.
Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.
153 awarded tenders, 126 different suppliers.
Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
Open notices
1 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build
| Notice | Deadline | Days left | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Royal Parks Half Marathon Event Service Provider | 30 Nov 2026 | 19d | £18,000,000 |
What they buyi
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
i
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each
45 Construction work28 procedures · 40%79 Business services: law, marketing, consulting14 procedures · 20% · 1 open71 Architectural, construction, engineering12 procedures · 17%77 Agricultural, forestry, horticultural services7 procedures · 10%55 Hotel, restaurant and retail trade services6 procedures · 9%90 Sewage, refuse, cleaning and environmental4 procedures · 6%48 Software package and information systems3 procedures · 4%50 Repair and maintenance services3 procedures · 4%How they buyi
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Last 24 months · 70 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract91%(64 notices)
64 of 70 notices are Contract (91%).Framework9%(6 notices)
6 of 70 notices are Framework (9%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Limited / restricted53%(37 notices)
37 of 70 notices are Limited / restricted (53%).Open19%(13 notices)
13 of 70 notices are Open (19%).Route not published19%(13 notices)
13 of 70 notices are Route not published (19%).Selective7%(5 notices)
5 of 70 notices are Selective (7%).Direct award3%(2 notices)
2 of 70 notices are Direct award (3%).
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.
i
How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.
Based on 8 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on 69 notices across all categories, last 24 months.
i
Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.
Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.
Based on 2 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPF Lewis | 8 | 5.2% | 8 | 8 | 5 Jun 2025 |
| Blakedown Landscapes (SE) Limited | 5 | 3.3% | 3 | 8 | 1 Nov 2026 |
| Lister Wilder Ltd | 5 | 3.3% | 0 | 5 | 4 Apr 2024 |
| Ernest Doe & Sons Ltd | 5 | 3.3% | 0 | 5 | 2 Apr 2024 |
| Talbot Farm Landscapes Limited | 4 | 2.6% | 1 | 4 | — |
| AEG Presents Ltd | 4 | 2.6% | 0 | 4 | — |
| LDN Graphics Ltd | 3 | 2% | 3 | 3 | — |
| Advanced Demand Side Management Limited | 3 | 2% | 2 | 3 | 18 Sept 2025 |
The three most frequent suppliers are named on 12% of 153 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 126 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
i
The middle published award value for this buyer.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Supplier | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Royal Parks Building Cleaning and Toilet Maintenance | JUST ASK ESTATE SERVICES LIMITED | 12 Dec 2025 | 4 yrs · up to 6 yrs | £18,000,000 ≈ £4.5m/yr |
| Roehampton Gate Café - Main Construction Works | CityAxis Limited | 17 Sept 2026 | 1.2 yrs | £5,225,546 ≈ £4.5m/yr |
| Refurbishment of the Lido Café building and associated ancillary structures | GPF Lewis | — | 9 mo | £285,042 † |
| Irrigation Systems upgrade at Hyde Park Nursery | CMW Horticulture Limited | — | 3 mo | £250,693 † |
| Provision of online sports and leisure booking software for The Royal Parks | OpenPlay Limited | — | 2.8 yrs · up to 4.8 yrs | £240,130 † ≈ £87k/yr |
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
150 of 168 contracts carry an end date, 11 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast
Soonest 10 of 19 contracts ending within 18 months.
Recent procedures
Latest 50 of 137 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement
Search all 137 procedures for this authority →
Contracts Finder adds 139 more procedures by this authority, mostly below the Find a Tender threshold or from before 2025. Each is counted once beside any Find a Tender copy; they are in the totals, not in this list or in search.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender and Contracts Finder), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly. Contracts Finder appears in live search, the Retender Radar, contract pages, organisation counts, the earlier contracts and past suppliers on a tender's competition panel, the buyer's decision figure and its award against estimate; the other analytical figures are built from Find a Tender notices.
- One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
- Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
- Contract end dates. 150 of 168 published contracts have an end date; 11 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar. Published values in that list come from either source; Contracts Finder figures are shown as published and stay out of this profile’s money totals.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.