Official UK procurement notice
Preliminary Maret Engagement notice for an Asset Management System at The Royal Parks
Authority: The Royal Parks Ltd (Public body)
Preliminary Maret Engagement notice for an Asset Management System at The Royal Parks Background and objectives. The Royal Parks is developing Project Park View, a programme to establish a modern, integrated approach to managing our physical and operational assets.
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionPreliminary Maret Engagement notice for an Asset Management System at The Royal Parks Background and objectives
The Royal Parks is developing Project Park View, a programme to establish a modern, integrated approach to managing our physical and operational assets.
Currently, asset information and associated processes are managed through a combination of existing systems, datasets and operational practices. This creates challenges in maintaining consistent asset information, supporting effective asset lifecycle management and providing a consolidated view of assets across the organisation.
We aim to introduce an Enterprise Asset Management System (EAMS) that will:
Establish a consistent and reliable asset register, supported by a common asset classification and hierarchies.
Improve visibility of asset location, condition, maintenance requirements and lifecycle information.
Support efficient asset inspections, maintenance and operational workflows.
Enable effective integration with geographic information systems, specifically Esri ArcGIS Online.
Improve reporting, analysis and evidence-based decision-making.
Provide a scalable platform capable of supporting additional asset management capabilities over time.
Our preference is to adopt an established, configurable solution that minimises bespoke development and supports long-term sustainability.
Anticipated scope and approach
The initial phase is expected to establish the core asset management platform.
For more information about this opportunity, please visit the eSourcing portal at:
www.delta-esourcing.com/tenders/UK-UK-London… ↗
To respond to this opportunity, please click here:
CPV: IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support · Software package and information systems
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedPipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How The Royal Parks Ltd buys Software package and information systems (CPV 48), and who usually turns up
The Royal Parks Ltd has little published record in this market. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Software package and information systems (CPV 48) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Across this market, small firms won 45% of awards with a known supplier size.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in Greater London.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Across this market, 32% of winners were registered in the delivery region.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards have an award date within 63 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
The market share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Across this market, at least 69% of awarded procurements had no recorded rival.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid21%
2–321%
4–642%
7+17%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Awards below, close to or above the estimate, per lot. The buyer side adds below-threshold contracts with a pre-award estimate; an award inside a published range counts as close.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate61%
Within ±2%15%
Above estimate24%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1CPV 48No real estimate
This lot lists more than one class in CPV 48. The comparison uses that group.
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 53 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid21%
2–321%
4–642%
7+17%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender and Contracts Finder), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly. Contracts Finder appears in live search, the Retender Radar, contract pages, organisation counts, the earlier contracts and past suppliers on a tender's competition panel, the buyer's decision figure and its award against estimate; the other analytical figures are built from Find a Tender notices.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 6 Nov 2026, 15:10 GMT
- Last source update
- 6 Nov 2026, 15:10 GMT
- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-105831- Latest notice
- Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-07b6c7Find a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
6 Nov 2026 → 1 Jun 2027 · 4 dates- Planning notice published4 days ago6 Nov 2026, 15:10 GMT
- Today11 Nov 2026
- Market engagementin 19 days30 Nov 2026, 23:59 GMT
The Royal Parks intends to issue a questionnaire through the Delta eProcurement portal. Suppliers will need to register for free access to the procurement documents and to submit a response. Registration and access details: www.delta-esourcing.com ↗
Suppliers wishing to participate should confirm their intention to take part by returning the response via the Delta Platform
Please return the completed questionnaire by the engagement deadline 12 nmidday Monday 30th November 2026
- Tender notice expectedin 50 days31 Dec 2026, 23:59 GMT
- Contract startsin 201 days1 Jun 2027, 00:00 BST
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Preliminary market engagement notice published6 Nov 2026, 15:10 GMTUK2
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (1)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender