PROCURE PLUS HOLDINGS LIMITED: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: PRI/LTD BY GUAR/NSC (Private, limited by guarantee, no share capital)North West EnglandOld TraffordRan 5 procurements for other authorities

Companies House05888820 ↗Websiteprocure-plus.com ↗

Open now4next deadline 7 Sept 2028
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months4-60% vs prior 12 months (10)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share39%of 18 awarded procedures · 377 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

18 awarded tenders, 377 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months1none within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Open notices

4 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
Dynamic Purchasing System for Consultancy ServicesDPS6 lots7 Sept 2028687d£12,000,000
Dynamic Purchasing System for Water Hygiene ServicesDPS3 Nov 2028744d£10,000,000
Dynamic Purchasing System for Installation and Repair Works (Midlands)DPScentral purchasing body12 lots5 Jan 2029808d£614,400,000
Dynamic Purchasing System for Commercial RetrofitDPS6 lots23 Feb 2029857d£215,000,000

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

45 Construction work5 procedures · 36% · 2 open
71 Architectural, construction, engineering4 procedures · 29% · 2 open
42 Industrial machinery3 procedures · 21% · 1 open
50 Repair and maintenance services2 procedures · 14% · 1 open

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 14 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Framework50%(7 notices)
    7 of 14 notices are Framework (50%).
  • Contract36%(5 notices)
    5 of 14 notices are Contract (36%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system14%(2 notices)
    2 of 14 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (14%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open50%(7 notices)
    7 of 14 notices are Open (50%).
  • Route not published29%(4 notices)
    4 of 14 notices are Route not published (29%).
  • Selective21%(3 notices)
    3 of 14 notices are Selective (21%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 2 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

6.5indicative · n=20% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from deadline to first award notice, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 4 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

124 daysmoderate · n=4
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 14 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

06 of 14 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimateindicative · n=1

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Rothwell Plumbing Services Limitedframework/DPS on 7738.9%23120 Apr 2026
Jackson Jackson and Sons Ltd.framework/DPS on 6633.3%24120 Apr 2026
Novus Property Solutions Ltdframework/DPS on 5527.8%22020 Apr 2026
Sustainable Building Services (UK) Ltdframework/DPS on 5527.8%21320 Apr 2026
Solarcrown Commercial Ltdframework/DPS on 5527.8%2710 Nov 2025
Sureserve Compliance North Limitedframework/DPS on 5527.8%1104 Nov 2025
P Casey & Co. Limitedframework/DPS on 4422.2%23120 Apr 2026
City Plumbing Supplies Holdings Limitedframework/DPS on 4422.2%21210 Nov 2025

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 39% of 18 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 377 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published end dates only · 44 of 190 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

ContractHolderEndsPublished value
Private medical insurance for employeesVitality Corporate Services Limited30 May 2027£40,000

Recent procedures

Latest 31 of 26 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Framework Agreement for Goods and Materials (Planned Maintenance Works)Framework35 lotsArticles for the bathroom and kitchenAwarded / complete25 Oct 2023£1,087,000,000
Framework Agreement for Installation and RepairFrameworkcentral purchasing body40 lotsBathrooms construction workAwarded / complete3 Aug 2023£2,520,000,000
Framework Agreement for Waste Management ServicesFrameworkcentral purchasing bodyRefuse and waste related servicesAwarded / complete6 Apr 2023£20,000,000
Framework agreement for Fleet Management ServicesFrameworkcentral purchasing bodyFleet managementAwarded / complete4 Nov 2022£76,800,000
External Audit ServicesFinancial auditing servicesAwarded / complete21 Jun 2022£458,000
Fire Risk and Mitigation Works and ServicesFrameworkcentral purchasing body17 lotsArchitectural and building-surveying servicesAwarded / complete20 May 2022£910,000,000
Framework Agreement for the Supply and Installation of Low and Zero Carbon TechnologiesFramework23 lotsHeat pumpsAwarded / complete1 Dec 2021£1,292,485,000

Search all 26 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 44 of 190 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.