Lake District National Park Authority: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

GOV.UK register: OtherONS register: National-park-authorityOther public bodyNorth West EnglandKendal

Official UK PPONPBPJ-8656-VBYRWebsitelakedistrict.gov.uk ↗

Open now1next deadline 2 Oct 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed.

Notices, last 12 months10+400% vs prior 12 months (2)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot40% single-bid · 12 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 12 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Published award value, 24m£843knet · on 11 of 11 single-supplier awards · top 5 = 79%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

1 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
Countryside Land Management and Estate Maintenance FrameworkFramework8 lots2 Oct 20262d£4,000,000

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

45 Construction work6 procedures · 50% · 1 open
71 Architectural, construction, engineering5 procedures · 42% · 1 open
44 Construction structures and materials2 procedures · 17% · 1 open

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 12 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract 92% (11 notices)
  • Framework 8% (1 notices)
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open 100% (12 notices)
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 12 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

4robust · n=120% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from deadline to first award notice, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 8 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

10 daysrobust · n=8
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 12 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

310 of 12 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 9 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

2.8% below estimaterobust · n=9

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Terra Firma Environmental Ltd112.5%121 Sept 2025
AIRE & CALDER LIMITED112.5%1110 Mar 2026
JIGSAW FACILITIES LIMITED112.5%1113 Feb 2026
MICHAEL SWORDS STUDIO LIMITED112.5%1118 Sept 2025
RJ Solar112.5%1122 Jul 2025
RenEnergy Ltd112.5%1116 Sept 2025
Ullswater Countryside Management Ltd112.5%111 Sept 2025
Crosby Granger Architects Ltd112.5%119 Oct 2025

8 awarded procedures across 10 suppliers — too few to describe concentration.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£843kSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 11 of 11 single-supplier awards; the five largest make 79%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

What one of this buyer’s contracts is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£46k middle valuerobust · n=11Middle half £31k–£82k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Public Toilet Cleaning 2026 - 2029JIGSAW FACILITIES LIMITED13 Feb 20263 yrs£260,224
≈ £87k/yr
Murley Moss Additional Solar - Design and BuildRenEnergy Ltd16 Sept 20256 mo£178,553
Traditional Farm Building Feasibility Studies Lots 1-4Crosby Granger Architects Ltd9 Oct 20255 mo£100,500
Listed Building Condition Surveys within the Lake District National ParkMICHAEL SWORDS STUDIO LIMITED18 Sept 20251.1 yrs£63,500
≈ £59k/yr
Lift Replacement - Murley MossPICKERINGS EUROPE LIMITED12 Nov 20254 mo£60,000

Recent procedures

Latest 12 of 12 procedures on this authority cluster, incl. beneficiary and procuring-entity roles

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Coniston Boating Centre - Reception Building ReplacementCabinsOpen25 Aug 2026£65,000
Cleaning Contract for Public Toilet facilitiesCleaning and sanitation servicesAwarded / complete19 Jun 2026£250,000
Waterhead Carpark Toilet Building RedesignArchitectural and related servicesOpen14 Apr 2026£10,000
Carbon Reduction Heating Redesign - Murley MossBuilding consultancy servicesOpen14 Apr 2026£7,500
Grass Cutting Service for various locationsGrassing servicesAwarded / complete11 Mar 2026£47,400
Lift Replacement - Murley MossLift installation workAwarded / complete18 Feb 2026£60,000
Murley Moss Additional Solar - Design and BuildConstruction workAwarded / complete10 Feb 2026£170,000
Path repair and access improvement work on the Coast to Coast in the high fells of the Lake District3 lotsSurface work for footpathsAwarded / complete28 Oct 2025£63,000
Traditional Farm Building Feasibility Studies5 lotsFeasibility studyAwarded / complete9 Oct 2025£150,000
Listed Building Condition Surveys within the Lake District National ParkArchitectural and building-surveying servicesAwarded / complete18 Sept 2025£70,000
Additional solar PV at LDNPA Northern OfficeElectrical equipment and apparatusAwarded / complete22 Jul 2025£30,000

Search all 12 procedures for this authority →

Data coverage & method
  • Source: Find a Tender OCDS releases; mixed PCR 2015 / Procurement Act 2023 history — no legal-regime label is applied.
  • Counts are procedures (one notice family), not lots. Authority cluster = canonical buyer plus beneficiary and procuring-entity roles.
  • Published procedure values exist on a minority of notices; their lifetime sum (£673k, ceilings stripped) is a catalogue fact, not spend, and is not shown as a headline.
  • Awards on procedures published in the last 24 months: 11 award records on 8 procedures (11 to a single canonical supplier, 0 multi-supplier). 0 values come from the contract record when the award carried none.
  • Bid counts, deadline-to-award, amendments and award-vs-estimate come from the nightly buyer analytics row; each figure’s own method and sample is behind its , the long form on Methodology.
  • Contract end dates: 5 of 5 published contracts carry a period end; 0 end within 18 months, 0 within 6.
  • Never shown: contact details, predicted winners, payment behaviour, or “who to invite”.