GA TRAINS LIMITED: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Private Limited CompanyGreater LondonLondon

Companies House12544897 ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months21+600% vs prior 12 months (3)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot333.3% single-bid · 3 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share20%of 15 awarded procedures · 18 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

15 awarded tenders, 18 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months1none within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£825mnet · on 11 of 11 published values · top 5 = 100%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 24 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract96%(23 notices)
    23 of 24 notices are Contract (96%).
  • Framework4%(1 notices)
    1 of 24 notices are Framework (4%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award50%(12 notices)
    12 of 24 notices are Direct award (50%).
  • Route not published21%(5 notices)
    5 of 24 notices are Route not published (21%).
  • Limited / restricted13%(3 notices)
    3 of 24 notices are Limited / restricted (13%).
  • Selective13%(3 notices)
    3 of 24 notices are Selective (13%).
  • Open4%(1 notices)
    1 of 24 notices are Open (4%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3moderate · n=333.3% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 24 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

03 of 24 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

4.8% below estimateindicative · n=1

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Amalgamated Construction Ltd16.7%1217 Jun 2026
UKG Technology Limited16.7%11—
Intergraph (UK) Limited16.7%112 Oct 2026
Alstom Enginnering and Services Limited16.7%1126 Feb 2026
THE TREVOR PATRICK PARTNERSHIP LIMITED16.7%1110 Jun 2026
RE: INTERNET SYSTEMS LIMITED16.7%111 Oct 2025
PABLO LONDON LIMITED16.7%114 Jun 2026
Gloster MEP Limited16.7%1110 Jun 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 20% of 15 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 18 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£825mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 11 of 11 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 100%; a further 5 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£468k middle valuerobust · n=11Middle half £250k–£1.9m.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
GA250111 Lot 2 Train Services Agreement for Class 720 Rolling StockAlstom Enginnering and Services Limited26 Feb 202615 yrs£812,412,877
≈ £54m/yr
Digital Customer Information SystemsBLACKBOX COMPANY (UK) LIMITED30 Jul 20262 yrs · up to 3 yrs£6,283,000
≈ £3.1m/yr
Rail Operating system and Software supportWorldline IT Services UK Limited26 Sept 20253 yrs£2,014,593
≈ £672k/yr
Stansted Express AirRail e-commerce retailing including consumer and tradeRE: INTERNET SYSTEMS LIMITED1 Oct 20253 yrs£1,782,000
≈ £594k/yr
Workforce Management and Rostering SystemUKG Technology Limited——£545,558 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published end dates only · 3 of 5 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 24 of 24 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Amendment Agreement in Relation to Various Lease Contracts in Respect of Ticketing GatesAwarded / complete13 Oct 2026—
Provision of an Enterprise Asset Management PackageAwarded / complete2 Oct 2026—
Operating Lease of Class 720 Rolling Stock UnitsAwarded / complete2 Oct 2026—
Train Services Agreement for Class 745 and 755 Rolling Stock UnitsAwarded / complete2 Oct 2026—
Operating Lease for Class 745 and Class 755 Rolling Stock UnitsAwarded / complete2 Oct 2026—
Train Services Agreement for Class 720 Rolling Stock2 lotsRepair and maintenance services of rolling stockAwarded / complete2 Oct 2026£1,726,000,000
Supply of Software Products, Hardware Products, and ServicesFrameworkAwarded / complete15 Sept 2026—
Ticket Vending Machines Support and MaintenanceAwarded / complete14 Sept 2026—
Workforce Management and Rostering SystemTime accounting or human resources software packageAwarded / complete25 Aug 2026—
Train Services Agreement for Class 745 and Class 755 Rolling Stock UnitsRepair and maintenance services of rolling stockPlanning18 Aug 2026—
Rolling Stock MaintenanceRepair and maintenance services of rolling stockPlanned14 Aug 2026£450,000,000
Purchase of Passenger Automatic Ticket Gates for Various StationsAwarded / complete6 Aug 2026—
Digital Customer Information SystemsAwarded / complete31 Jul 2026—
Service Quality Inspections and SystemAuditing servicesPlanning29 Jun 2026£550,000
Strategic Creative Marketing ServicesAwarded / complete26 Jun 2026—
Form A Design WorksAwarded / complete17 Jun 2026—
Hidden Critical ElementsArchitectural and building-surveying servicesPlanned28 May 2026£3,000,000
Cambridge Depot Sanding SystemInstallation services of machinery and equipmentPlanned28 May 2026£2,131,000
Supply of food and drink for consumption on board trains5 lotsBeerOpen13 Apr 2026£2,576,004
Lease Vehicle FleetFleet managementPlanning13 Jan 2026£1,323,212

Search all 24 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 3 of 5 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.