Software-related services: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition

CPV 72260000Services · classin IT Services & Software

Open now20open for bids now · see them in the search
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months841391 contracting authorities · 1,582 in the catalogue
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot327% single-bid · 74 procedures, 36 months
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 75 lots from 74 competitions run by 59 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 37 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 3) and 38 from older notices (bids received, middle 3).

Last 36 months.

Typical contract value£94,528middle value of 844 contract awards, net · not frameworks
i

What a contract here is usually worth.

Middle value of published award values, VAT excluded. Framework ceilings are left out because they are not real contract values.

Based on 844 awards with a usable value, last 36 months.

Published values, not actual spend.

Last 36 months.

Deadline to award54 daysmiddle value · 46 awarded procedures
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Based on 46 decided competitions, last 36 months.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Newest open tenders

3 of 20 open for bids now · newest first

See all 20 open tenders →

Codes and neighbouring classes

The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division

Who buys
i

Which buyers publish the most notices here.

Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.

All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name

Buyer type
i

What kinds of public bodies buy here.

Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.

  • Central government43%(657 notices)
    657 of 1,520 notices are Central government (43%).
  • Local authorities21%(317 notices)
    317 of 1,520 notices are Local authorities (21%).
  • Other public bodies13%(200 notices)
    200 of 1,520 notices are Other public bodies (13%).
  • Education & universities9%(143 notices)
    143 of 1,520 notices are Education & universities (9%).
  • Police, fire & emergency7%(107 notices)
    107 of 1,520 notices are Police, fire & emergency (7%).
  • Not classified6%(96 notices)
    96 of 1,520 notices are Not classified (6%).
Contracting authorityTypeNoticesLast 12 monthsOpen now
Ministry of DefenceCentral government50170
UK Research and InnovationCentral government47300
University of the West of EnglandEducation & universities33130
NHS EnglandCentral government2880
GENOMICS ENGLAND LIMITEDCentral government2160
Hull City CouncilLocal authorities18160
Police, Fire & Crime Commissioner for StaffordshirePolice, fire & emergency15150
NHS Blood and TransplantCentral government1420
Corporate Officer of the House of CommonsCentral government13100
NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITEDCentral government13100

621 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.

Where the work is delivered
i

Where the work on these notices is delivered.

Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.

Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.

Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 920 of 1,582 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region

RegionNoticesBids / lotSME winsLocal wins
South West England196 · 21%838%10%
South East England181 · 20%235%27%
Yorkshire and the Humber180 · 20%538%13%
North West England160 · 17%531%9%
East of England150 · 16%536%12%
Greater London148 · 16%734%33%
East Midlands131 · 14%—38%11%
West Midlands130 · 14%536%6%
North East England129 · 14%—38%10%
Scotland103 · 11%322%24%
Wales (Cymru)76 · 8%627%16%
Northern Ireland34 · 4%———

Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.

How it is bought
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract95%(1,504 notices)
    1,504 of 1,582 notices are Contract (95%).
  • Framework5%(73 notices)
    73 of 1,582 notices are Framework (5%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system0%(5 notices)
    5 of 1,582 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (0%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award34%(544 notices)
    544 of 1,582 notices are Direct award (34%).
  • Limited / restricted26%(410 notices)
    410 of 1,582 notices are Limited / restricted (26%).
  • Route not published19%(305 notices)
    305 of 1,582 notices are Route not published (19%).
  • Open14%(218 notices)
    218 of 1,582 notices are Open (14%).
  • Selective7%(105 notices)
    105 of 1,582 notices are Selective (7%).
Threshold
i

How much of this market is above the legal threshold.

Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.

  • Above threshold81%(184 notices)
    184 of 228 notices are Above threshold (81%).
  • Below threshold19%(44 notices)
    44 of 228 notices are Below threshold (19%).
Typical tender window
i

How long bidders get to respond.

Middle value in days from the tender notice to its deadline.

All notices we hold, not just recent ones.

29 daysrobust · n=119middle value, notice to deadline

Competition

Contracts published in the last 36 months (1,066) · bid counts per lot from award notices · values are net contract awards, framework and DPS ceilings excluded · SME and local status as declared

Bids per lot · n=75
i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

  • 1 bid27%(20)
    20 of 75 lots fall in 1 bid (27%).
  • 2–332%(24)
    24 of 75 lots fall in 2–3 (32%).
  • 4–620%(15)
    15 of 75 lots fall in 4–6 (20%).
  • 7 or more21%(16)
    16 of 75 lots fall in 7 or more (21%).
Contract value, net
i

The usual range of contract values here.

The middle half of published award values, VAT excluded, with the middle value marked. Framework ceilings are left out.

Published values, not actual spend.

p25 £34,171middle value £94,528p75 £305,250
interquartile range of 844 awards · p90 £1,262,490
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 75 lots from 74 competitions run by 59 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 37 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 3) and 38 from older notices (bids received, middle 3).

Last 36 months.

3robust · n=74middle half 1–6
Competed
i

How much of this market is actually put out to competition.

Notices run as an open or selective procedure, out of all notices that say which procedure was used. Direct awards count as not competed.

151 of 969 notices that state a procedure, last 36 months. 97 more are call-offs or give no procedure and are left out.

Last 36 months.

16%robust · n=969
Bids from SMEs
i

What share of bids come from small and medium firms.

SME bids divided by all bids, on lots where the buyer published the split.

173 SME bids out of 273, on 58 lots where the buyer published the split.

Last 36 months.

63%robust · n=273
Awards won by SMEs
i

What share of contracts go to small and medium firms.

Awards to a single supplier that declared its size. SME divided by all.

193 of 588 awards where the winner declared its size.

Last 36 months.

33%robust · n=588
Won locally
i

How much work here goes to companies based in the region.

Contract awards where the winner’s registered address is in this region, out of awards where the address is known.

Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.

Last 36 months.

31%robust · n=453winner registered in the delivery region
Winning award vs estimate
i

Do winners come in above or below the buyer’s estimate.

For each lot we compare the published estimate with the award, like for like. Below means the winner was paid less than estimated, above means more.

Based on 47 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 36 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 36 months.

8% below the estimaterobust · n=4727 below · 9 above
Abandoned
i

How often a tender ends with no award.

Notices cancelled, withdrawn or marked unsuccessful, plus terminated ones that never got an award.

14 of 1,066 notices, last 36 months.

Only what buyers published. Tenders that quietly went nowhere are not counted.

Last 36 months.

1%robust · n=1,066
Frameworks & DPS: bidders per lot
i

How many companies apply to get onto a framework or DPS here.

Middle value per lot, frameworks and dynamic markets only. Getting onto a panel is not the same as winning work, so it is kept separate.

Based on 16 lots from 9 framework and DPS notices, last 36 months.

Last 36 months.

5robust · n=940 vehicle procedures · admission to a panel, not a contest

Who wins
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 1,374 awards to 865 suppliers · the five most frequent winners hold 8% of contract awards in the last 36 months

SupplierProceduresAwardsLast 12 monthsBuyers
Oracle Corporation UK Limited28281621
Softcat Plc22241421
CIVICA UK LIMITED1919717
Access UK Ltd18191116
Insight Direct161659
Microsoft Ltd1414812
Phoenix Software Ltd1313811
IDOX SOFTWARE LTD101139

Where to submit
i

Where bids for this work are submitted.

Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.

E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 221 of 1,582 notices name one · each portal page explains registration

Proactis / ProContract25 notices · 11% · 1 open
Public Contracts Scotland (PCS)21 notices · 10% · 2 open
Delta eSourcing17 notices · 8% · 1 open
Sell2Wales17 notices · 8%
JAGGAER / BravoSolution11 notices · 5%

Open tenders in software-related services

20 open for bids now · soonest deadline first

All 20 open notices with CPV 7226… →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly. Contracts Finder contracts appear on the Retender Radar, not yet in these figures.
  • What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 7226. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2021 to 5 Nov 2026.
  • Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
  • Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.