Programming services of packaged software products: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition

CPV 72210000Services · classin IT Services & Software

Open now36open for bids now · see them in the search
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months532304 contracting authorities · 1,314 in the catalogue
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot54% single-bid · 77 procedures, 36 months
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 78 lots from 77 competitions run by 72 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 47 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 4) and 31 from older notices (bids received, middle 5).

Last 36 months.

Typical contract value£99,750middle value of 525 contract awards, net · not frameworks
i

What a contract here is usually worth.

Middle value of published award values, VAT excluded. Framework ceilings are left out because they are not real contract values.

Based on 525 awards with a usable value, last 36 months.

Published values, not actual spend.

Last 36 months.

Deadline to award49 daysmiddle value · 61 awarded procedures
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Based on 61 decided competitions, last 36 months.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Newest open tenders

3 of 36 open for bids now · newest first

See all 36 open tenders →

Codes and neighbouring classes

The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division

Who buys
i

Which buyers publish the most notices here.

Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.

All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name

Buyer type
i

What kinds of public bodies buy here.

Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.

  • Central government38%(482 notices)
    482 of 1,269 notices are Central government (38%).
  • Local authorities21%(263 notices)
    263 of 1,269 notices are Local authorities (21%).
  • Other public bodies14%(173 notices)
    173 of 1,269 notices are Other public bodies (14%).
  • Education & universities13%(164 notices)
    164 of 1,269 notices are Education & universities (13%).
  • Police, fire & emergency3%(38 notices)
    38 of 1,269 notices are Police, fire & emergency (3%).
  • Not classified12%(149 notices)
    149 of 1,269 notices are Not classified (12%).
Contracting authorityTypeNoticesLast 12 monthsOpen now
Ministry of DefenceCentral government54180
UK Research and InnovationCentral government21100
The Mayor and Commonalty and Citizens of the City of LondonLocal authorities20100
NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITEDCentral government1931
NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership (hosted by Velindre University NHS Trust)Central government1620
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustCentral government15100
UK Atomic Energy AuthorityCentral government1441
Home OfficeCentral government14110
NHS EnglandCentral government1220
British Library BoardCentral government1150

617 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.

Where the work is delivered
i

Where the work on these notices is delivered.

Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.

Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.

Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 717 of 1,314 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region

RegionNoticesBids / lotSME winsLocal wins
South East England155 · 22%—32%17%
Greater London141 · 20%738%49%
Yorkshire and the Humber123 · 17%—38%16%
West Midlands122 · 17%—30%7%
East of England121 · 17%540%7%
North East England106 · 15%643%2%
North West England105 · 15%327%15%
South West England100 · 14%—30%7%
East Midlands98 · 14%—36%13%
Wales (Cymru)84 · 12%335%19%
Scotland82 · 11%350%—
Northern Ireland39 · 5%———

Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.

How it is bought
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract95%(1,248 notices)
    1,248 of 1,314 notices are Contract (95%).
  • Framework4%(57 notices)
    57 of 1,314 notices are Framework (4%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system1%(9 notices)
    9 of 1,314 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (1%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open27%(352 notices)
    352 of 1,314 notices are Open (27%).
  • Route not published22%(289 notices)
    289 of 1,314 notices are Route not published (22%).
  • Direct award22%(285 notices)
    285 of 1,314 notices are Direct award (22%).
  • Limited / restricted19%(252 notices)
    252 of 1,314 notices are Limited / restricted (19%).
  • Selective10%(136 notices)
    136 of 1,314 notices are Selective (10%).
Threshold
i

How much of this market is above the legal threshold.

Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.

  • Above threshold72%(220 notices)
    220 of 305 notices are Above threshold (72%).
  • Below threshold28%(85 notices)
    85 of 305 notices are Below threshold (28%).
Typical tender window
i

How long bidders get to respond.

Middle value in days from the tender notice to its deadline.

All notices we hold, not just recent ones.

30 daysrobust · n=192middle value, notice to deadline

Competition

Contracts published in the last 36 months (740) · bid counts per lot from award notices · values are net contract awards, framework and DPS ceilings excluded · SME and local status as declared

Bids per lot · n=78
i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

  • 1 bid4%(3)
    3 of 78 lots fall in 1 bid (4%).
  • 2–335%(27)
    27 of 78 lots fall in 2–3 (35%).
  • 4–632%(25)
    25 of 78 lots fall in 4–6 (32%).
  • 7 or more29%(23)
    23 of 78 lots fall in 7 or more (29%).
Contract value, net
i

The usual range of contract values here.

The middle half of published award values, VAT excluded, with the middle value marked. Framework ceilings are left out.

Published values, not actual spend.

p25 £38,880middle value £99,750p75 £321,888
interquartile range of 525 awards · p90 £1,042,218
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 78 lots from 77 competitions run by 72 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 47 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 4) and 31 from older notices (bids received, middle 5).

Last 36 months.

5robust · n=77middle half 3–7
Competed
i

How much of this market is actually put out to competition.

Notices run as an open or selective procedure, out of all notices that say which procedure was used. Direct awards count as not competed.

213 of 676 notices that state a procedure, last 36 months. 64 more are call-offs or give no procedure and are left out.

Last 36 months.

32%robust · n=676
Bids from SMEs
i

What share of bids come from small and medium firms.

SME bids divided by all bids, on lots where the buyer published the split.

249 SME bids out of 366, on 64 lots where the buyer published the split.

Last 36 months.

68%robust · n=366
Awards won by SMEs
i

What share of contracts go to small and medium firms.

Awards to a single supplier that declared its size. SME divided by all.

147 of 380 awards where the winner declared its size.

Last 36 months.

39%robust · n=380
Won locally
i

How much work here goes to companies based in the region.

Contract awards where the winner’s registered address is in this region, out of awards where the address is known.

Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.

Last 36 months.

35%robust · n=231winner registered in the delivery region
Winning award vs estimate
i

Do winners come in above or below the buyer’s estimate.

For each lot we compare the published estimate with the award, like for like. Below means the winner was paid less than estimated, above means more.

Based on 56 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 36 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 36 months.

1% below the estimaterobust · n=5626 below · 11 above
Abandoned
i

How often a tender ends with no award.

Notices cancelled, withdrawn or marked unsuccessful, plus terminated ones that never got an award.

31 of 740 notices, last 36 months.

Only what buyers published. Tenders that quietly went nowhere are not counted.

Last 36 months.

4%robust · n=740
Frameworks & DPS: bidders per lot
i

How many companies apply to get onto a framework or DPS here.

Middle value per lot, frameworks and dynamic markets only. Getting onto a panel is not the same as winning work, so it is kept separate.

Based on 17 lots from 11 framework and DPS notices, last 36 months.

Last 36 months.

10robust · n=1129 vehicle procedures · admission to a panel, not a contest

Who wins
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 1,079 awards to 715 suppliers · the five most frequent winners hold 6% of contract awards in the last 36 months

Where to submit
i

Where bids for this work are submitted.

Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.

E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 316 of 1,314 notices name one · each portal page explains registration

In-tend Electronic Procurement48 notices · 15% · 4 open
Delta eSourcing42 notices · 13%
JAGGAER / BravoSolution34 notices · 11% · 4 open
Public Contracts Scotland (PCS)33 notices · 10% · 1 open
EU-Supply Complete Tender Management24 notices · 8% · 2 open
Proactis / ProContract24 notices · 8%

Open tenders in programming services of packaged…

36 open for bids now · soonest deadline first

NoticeAuthorityDeadlineDays leftPublished value
Secure Connection PortalBorough of Telford & Wrekin9 Nov 20264d£20,000
CotswoldsPlus Local Visitor Economy Data Platform to Include Support and MaintenanceCotswold District Council9 Nov 20264d£280,000
Hazard Management ToolUK Atomic Energy Authority10 Nov 20265d£50,000
FW Services - Procurement Cost Estimation and demand planning ToolsFramework2 lotsSCOTTISH HYDRO ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION PLC13 Nov 20268d£3,756,850 ceiling
Microsoft Business Central Delivery and Support PartnerDepartment for Education17 Nov 202612d£13,455,016
BU452026- Digital Reconstruction of Former Hospital in North WalesPrifysgol Bangor / Bangor University20 Nov 202615d£304,750
T26-121CRO Committee Management SoftwareDerry City and Strabane District Council20 Nov 202615d£45,000
ID 6723703 - DOF - EDD - NICS Identity Assurance (NIDA) SolutionCPD - Supplies and Services Division20 Nov 202615d£5,500,000
SSEN Website Development & Support PQQFrameworkSOUTHERN ELECTRIC POWER DISTRIBUTION PLC21 Nov 202616d£2,500,000 ceiling
Belfast Stories – Story EngineBelfast City Council23 Nov 202618d£550,000
C002187 Framework Agreement for the provision of a Learning Management SystemFrameworkThe Common Services Agency (more commonly known as NHS National Services Scotland) ("NSS")25 Nov 202620d—
AI AVATAR (Suffolk Economy)Suffolk County Council26 Nov 202621d£50,000
LEGO299 End-to-End Reporting, Budgeting, Forecasting and Financial Reporting SolutionThe Office for Legal Complaints30 Nov 202625d£100,000
Virtual Accessibility ToursNETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED30 Nov 202625d£4,100,000
PRO005158-Services-Contract-System Integrator : Billing and CRMUnited Utilities Water Limited18 Dec 202643d£10,000,000
EPoS systems (2025 - 2029)DPS8 lotsTHE UNIVERSITY CATERERS ORGANISATION LIMITED5 Dec 2028761d£1,800,000 ceiling

All 36 open notices with CPV 7221… →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly. Contracts Finder contracts appear on the Retender Radar, not yet in these figures.
  • What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 7221. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2021 to 4 Nov 2026.
  • Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
  • Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.