University of Sheffield: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Royal Charter CompanyDfE school register: Higher education institutionsEducationYorkshire and the HumberSheffield

Official UK PPONPXDP-7327-GWHT

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed.

Notices, last 12 months22+5% vs prior 12 months (21)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot242.9% single-bid · 14 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 14 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share5%of 100 awarded procedures · 126 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

100 awarded tenders, 126 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months6none within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published award value, 24m£27mnet · on 20 of 24 single-supplier awards · top 5 = 89%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 43 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract 91% (39 notices)
  • Dynamic purchasing system 5% (2 notices)
  • Framework 5% (2 notices)
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open 60% (26 notices)
  • Route not published 23% (10 notices)
  • Limited / restricted 9% (4 notices)
  • Selective 5% (2 notices)
  • Direct award 2% (1 notices)
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 14 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

2robust · n=1442.9% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from deadline to first award notice, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 9 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

34 daysrobust · n=9
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 43 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

326 of 43 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 15 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimaterobust · n=15

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
KPMG33%0331 May 2023
B. and B. Press (Parkgate) Limitedframework/DPS on 222%1221 Jul 2025
Hickling & Squires UKframework/DPS on 222%1221 Jul 2025
W&J Linney Ltdframework/DPS on 222%1221 Jul 2025
Optichrome Ltdframework/DPS on 222%1221 Jul 2025
Belmont Pressframework/DPS on 222%1221 Jul 2025
SciMed Ltd22%0928 Nov 2022
Anton Paar22%0613 Apr 2023

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 5% of 100 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 126 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards — not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£27mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 20 of 24 single-supplier awards; the five largest make 89%; a further 3 published a VAT-inclusive amount only (£868k inc. VAT, kept apart).
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

What one of this buyer’s contracts is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£236k middle valuerobust · n=20Middle half £145k–£370k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
4184.EFM.SW.24 Faculty of Health Phase 1 New BuildClegg Construction Limited——£15,699,033 †
MBE SystemDCA Instruments Oy——£4,878,210 †
Rehosting Partner for Stanage Data CentreSoftcat Plc——£2,939,430 †
4585/AMRC/CK/25 Gas Decarbonisation Equipment & Carbon Removal ServicesSuiso Limited15 Dec 20252 yrs£470,000
≈ £235k/yr
4855/AMRC/GM/2025 Kiln Modification for Hydrogen / Natural Gas MixTherser (UK) Ltd15 Dec 20251.5 yrs£399,613
≈ £266k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published end dates only · 26 of 157 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 138 procedures on this authority cluster, incl. beneficiary and procuring-entity roles

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Rotating Spindle Drilling SystemDrilling equipmentAwarded / complete15 Oct 2024—
4265/DM/24 - Image intensified CCD Camera system plus UV optics2 lotsCamerasOpen11 Oct 2024£150,700
Catering Services FrameworkFrameworkCanteen and catering servicesAwarded / complete10 Oct 2024—
Power Framework Software and SupportFrameworkSoftware support servicesAwarded / complete1 Oct 2024—
Digital Production Print EquipmentPrinting machineryAwarded / complete30 Sept 2024—
4165/JN/24 - Mass PhotometerDetection and analysis apparatusAwarded / complete23 Sept 2024—
4153/AMRC/GM/24 Fibre Reinforced Thermoplastic Tape Development Cell R2Industrial machineryAwarded / complete21 Aug 2024—
Lecture Capture SystemSoftware package and information systemsAwarded / complete25 Jul 2024—
Library Management SystemsLibrary software packageAwarded / complete17 Jul 2024—
Short Pulse LaserIndustrial lasersUnsuccessful10 Jul 2024—

Search all 138 procedures for this authority →

Data coverage & method
  • Source: Find a Tender OCDS releases; mixed PCR 2015 / Procurement Act 2023 history — no legal-regime label is applied.
  • Counts are procedures (one notice family), not lots. Authority cluster = canonical buyer plus beneficiary and procuring-entity roles.
  • Published procedure values exist on a minority of notices; their lifetime sum (£31m, ceilings stripped) is a catalogue fact, not spend, and is not shown as a headline.
  • Awards on procedures published in the last 24 months: 25 award records on 24 procedures (24 to a single canonical supplier, 1 multi-supplier). 14 values come from the contract record when the award carried none; 3 awards published only a VAT-inclusive amount and are counted but not valued.
  • Bid counts, deadline-to-award, amendments and award-vs-estimate come from the nightly buyer analytics row; each figure’s own method and sample is behind its , the long form on Methodology.
  • Contract end dates: 26 of 157 published contracts carry a period end; 6 end within 18 months, 0 within 6.
  • Never shown: contact details, predicted winners, payment behaviour, or “who to invite”.
Identifiers consolidated into this page (13 historical Find a Tender publication identifiers)

Official notices referenced this authority under these publication identifiers. Alias URLs are not separate pages.

GB-CHC-RC000067GB-CHC-RC1200067GB-CHC-X1089GB-CHC-XC1089GB-CHC-x1089GB-COH-RC000667GB-COH-X1089GB-FTS-101204GB-FTS-15834GB-FTS-46605GB-FTS-613GB-FTS-86381GB-UKPRN-UKPRN 10007157

Canonical page id: GB-PPON-PXDP-7327-GWHT