LEEDS TRINITY UNIVERSITY: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: PRI/LBG/NSC (Private, Limited by guarantee, no share capital, use of 'Limited' exemption)DfE school register: Higher education institutionsEducationYorkshire and the HumberLeeds

Companies House06305220 ↗Websiteleedstrinity.ac.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed.

Notices, last 12 months24+100% vs prior 12 months (12)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot70% single-bid · 3 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share15%of 39 awarded procedures · 49 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

39 awarded tenders, 49 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months92 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published award value, 24m£1.9mnet · on 15 of 26 single-supplier awards · top 5 = 78%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 36 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract 94% (34 notices)
  • Framework 6% (2 notices)
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award 42% (15 notices)
  • Limited / restricted 19% (7 notices)
  • Route not published 19% (7 notices)
  • Open 14% (5 notices)
  • Selective 6% (2 notices)
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

7moderate · n=30% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 36 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

05 of 36 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

6.7% below estimateindicative · n=1

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
APPOYAR SERVICES LIMITED25.1%2224 Aug 2026
THE COPYRIGHT LICENSING AGENCY LTD25.1%224 Aug 2026
The Royal Mail Group Limited (t/a Parcelforce Worldwide)25.1%225 Aug 2026
HAYS SPECIALIST RECRUITMENT LIMITEDframework/DPS on 112.6%1828 Aug 2025
Michael Page International Recruitment Limitedframework/DPS on 112.6%1628 Aug 2025
Reed Specialist Recruitment Limited,framework/DPS on 112.6%1428 Aug 2025
Pertemps Recruitment Partnership Ltdframework/DPS on 112.6%1328 Aug 2025
LA International Computer Consultants Ltdframework/DPS on 112.6%1328 Aug 2025

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 15% of 39 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 49 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards — not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£1.9mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 15 of 26 single-supplier awards; the five largest make 78%; a further 10 published a VAT-inclusive amount only (£739k inc. VAT, kept apart).
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

What one of this buyer’s contracts is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£60k middle valuerobust · n=15Middle half £31k–£96k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Cleaning ServicesBulloughs Cleaning Services Ltd——£587,820 †
HR SystemMHR INTERNATIONAL UK LIMITED——£547,000 †
Sophos MDRPhoenix Software Ltd——£162,000 †
Copyright Licensing Agency fees 2026-27THE COPYRIGHT LICENSING AGENCY LTD—1 yrs£108,030 †
≈ £108k/yr
Consultancy Services - Strategic Project ManagementTRUPEAK CONSULTING LTD—3 mo · up to 1.3 yrs£83,220 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published end dates only · 22 of 48 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 59 procedures on this authority cluster, incl. beneficiary and procuring-entity roles

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
University Shuttle Bus 2024Hire of buses and coaches with driverPlanned18 Dec 2023—
Business Analysis and Project Management ServicesProject management consultancy servicesAwarded / complete18 Dec 2023—
International Student Enquiry Management System (ISEMS)Assessment centre services for recruitmentAwarded / complete13 Nov 2023—
Shuttle Bus serviceHire of buses and coaches with driverCancelled26 Sept 2023—
Moodle HostingMiscellaneous software development services and computer systemsAwarded / complete3 Mar 2023—
PFB035 Framework Agreement for Events Management ServicesFrameworkEvent servicesOpen1 Feb 2023£250,000
Digital Apprenticeship Management ToolIndustry specific software packageAwarded / complete19 Jan 2023—
ITS071LTU 2022 SITS DEVELOPER (contractor)Industry specific software development servicesAwarded / complete13 Jan 2023—
CRM PlatformMiscellaneous software package and computer systemsAwarded / complete21 Dec 2022—
Occupational Health Services Initial Screening and Assessment for Nursing and Allied Health ProgrammesMiscellaneous health servicesOpen2 Dec 2022£300,000

Search all 59 procedures for this authority →

Data coverage & method
  • Source: Find a Tender OCDS releases; mixed PCR 2015 / Procurement Act 2023 history — no legal-regime label is applied.
  • Counts are procedures (one notice family), not lots. Authority cluster = canonical buyer plus beneficiary and procuring-entity roles.
  • Published procedure values exist on a minority of notices; their lifetime sum (£2.0m, ceilings stripped) is a catalogue fact, not spend, and is not shown as a headline.
  • Awards on procedures published in the last 24 months: 36 award records on 27 procedures (26 to a single canonical supplier, 10 multi-supplier). 15 values come from the contract record when the award carried none; 10 awards published only a VAT-inclusive amount and are counted but not valued.
  • Bid counts, deadline-to-award, amendments and award-vs-estimate come from the nightly buyer analytics row; each figure’s own method and sample is behind its , the long form on Methodology.
  • Contract end dates: 22 of 48 published contracts carry a period end; 9 end within 18 months, 2 within 6.
  • Never shown: contact details, predicted winners, payment behaviour, or “who to invite”.
Identifiers consolidated into this page (5 historical Find a Tender publication identifiers)

Official notices referenced this authority under these publication identifiers. Alias URLs are not separate pages.

GB-COH-6305220GB-FTS-39349GB-FTS-48765GB-FTS-5047GB-FTS-5048

Canonical page id: GB-COH-06305220