Heriot-Watt University: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

EducationScotlandRiccarton, EdinburghCentral purchasing body on 12 of 21 notices

Find a Tender organisation id185139Websitehw.ac.uk ↗

Open now1next deadline 16 Nov 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months12+33% vs prior 12 months (9)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot7.50% single-bid · 8 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 8 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share11%of 54 awarded procedures · 68 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

54 awarded tenders, 68 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Published award value, 24m£3.1mnet · on 11 of 11 published values · top 5 = 63%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

1 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 21 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract90%(19 notices)
    19 of 21 notices are Contract (90%).
  • Framework10%(2 notices)
    2 of 21 notices are Framework (10%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open71%(15 notices)
    15 of 21 notices are Open (71%).
  • Limited / restricted29%(6 notices)
    6 of 21 notices are Limited / restricted (29%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 8 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

7.5robust · n=80% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 21 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

010 of 21 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
PHOTONIC SOLUTIONS LIMITEDframework/DPS on 123.7%23—
Chandler Engineering23.7%14—
Greentech Sportsturf Ltd23.7%12—
Keysight Technologies UK Limited11.9%12—
Guardian Electrical Compliance Ltd11.9%11—
attocube systems AG11.9%11—
Moorfield Nanotechnology Ltd11.9%11—
WGM Consulting Engineers11.9%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 11% of 54 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 68 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£3.1mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 11 of 11 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 63%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£327k middle valuerobust · n=11Middle half £191k–£379k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
The Supply of Cleaning & Janitorial ProductsUnico Ltd——£440,000 †
Window Cleaning ServicesBrew Contract Cleaning Ltd——£400,000 †
Purchase of High Energy Ultrafast Laser System with Optical Parametric AmplifierPHOTONIC SOLUTIONS LIMITED——£379,428 †
Portable Appliance Testing (PAT) and Fixed Appliance Testing (FAT)Guardian Electrical Compliance Ltd——£378,330 †
Virtualisation Infrastructure Servers and StorageCircle IT Solutions Ltd——£352,329 †

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 74 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Engineering Inspection Servicescentral purchasing body2 lotsArchitecturalAwarded / complete18 Aug 2023—
Internet Service Provision – Halls of Residences, Edinburgh & Galashiels Campusescentral purchasing bodyInternet servicesAwarded / complete15 Aug 2023—
Purchase of Spot Robotcentral purchasing bodyLaboratoryAwarded / complete7 Jul 2023—
Purchase of Flow Cytometercentral purchasing bodyMedical equipmentsAwarded / complete22 May 2023—
The Provision of Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) Agency Servicescentral purchasing bodyIT services: consultingAwarded / complete7 Feb 2023—
Consultancy Services for Banner Transformationcentral purchasing bodyIT services: consultingAwarded / complete4 Jan 2023—
Global Digital Platform – Cloud Hostedcentral purchasing bodyIT services: consultingAwarded / complete2 Dec 2022—
Software Solution to Support Student Curriculum PlacementEducational software packageAwarded / complete8 Nov 2022—
The Provision of Business Development Servicescentral purchasing bodyBusiness development consultancy servicesAwarded / complete3 Nov 2022—

Search all 74 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 1 of 81 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.