Cardiff Community Housing Association (CCHA): Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Registered SocietyWales (Cymru)Cardiff

Official UK PPONPTQR-5447-WPQLWebsiteccha.org.uk ↗

Open now1next deadline 10 Nov 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months10+233% vs prior 12 months (3)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot60% single-bid · 5 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share27%of 11 awarded procedures · 12 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

11 awarded tenders, 12 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Published award value, 24m£775knet · on 6 of 6 published values · top 5 = 99%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

1 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
S20 Lifts - Avondale, Selwyn Morris & Galleon3 lots10 Nov 202620d£270,000

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 13 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(13 notices)
    13 of 13 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open85%(11 notices)
    11 of 13 notices are Open (85%).
  • Direct award8%(1 notices)
    1 of 13 notices are Direct award (8%).
  • Route not published8%(1 notices)
    1 of 13 notices are Route not published (8%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

6robust · n=50% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from deadline to first award notice, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 5 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

39 daysrobust · n=5
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 13 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

17 of 13 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 4 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

7.9% below estimatemoderate · n=4

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
CEZANNE HR LIMITED19.1%115 May 2026
Hoistway Ltd19.1%1124 Nov 2025
Salesforce UK Limited19.1%1131 Jul 2025
HW Controls & Assurance Ltd19.1%1117 Mar 2026
PGI - PROTECTION GROUP INTERNATIONAL LTD.19.1%1118 Dec 2025
Delta Wellbeing Ltd19.1%1117 Mar 2026
MSS WATER LIMITED19.1%01—
Cardo (Central) Limited19.1%01—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 27% of 11 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 12 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£775kSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 6 of 6 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 99%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£90k middle valuerobust · n=6Middle half £32k–£92k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Salesforce CRM and Housing Management solution LicencesSalesforce UK Limited31 Jul 20254.7 yrs · up to 9.7 yrs£478,279
≈ £102k/yr
Erskine Court - Lift Replacement ProjectHoistway Ltd24 Nov 20252 mo£92,796
Internal Audit ServicesHW Controls & Assurance Ltd17 Mar 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£91,140
≈ £30k/yr
Integrated HRIS, LMS and payroll softwareCEZANNE HR LIMITED5 May 20261 yrs · up to 4 yrs£89,856
≈ £90k/yr
Out of Hours Call HandlingDelta Wellbeing Ltd17 Mar 202610 mo£13,203

Recent procedures

Latest 24 of 24 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Water Hygiene ServicesBuilding consultancy servicesAwarded / complete16 Dec 2021£250,000
Provision of Insurance and related services to Cardiff Community Housing Associationcentral purchasing body5 lotsContractor's all-risk insurance servicesOpen1 Nov 2021£698,860
Asbestos surveys and removals contracts2 lotsAnalysis servicesAwarded / complete30 Jun 2021—

Search all 24 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 1 of 5 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.