Borough Council of Kings Lynn and West Norfolk: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Local authorityEast of EnglandKing's Lynn

Official UK PPONPZQQ-4816-TPLW

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months46+53% vs prior 12 months (30)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot611.1% single-bid · 9 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 9 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share15%of 55 awarded procedures · 56 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

55 awarded tenders, 56 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months234 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£5.0mnet · on 33 of 33 published values · top 5 = 54%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 76 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract97%(74 notices)
    74 of 76 notices are Contract (97%).
  • Framework3%(2 notices)
    2 of 76 notices are Framework (3%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award37%(28 notices)
    28 of 76 notices are Direct award (37%).
  • Open32%(24 notices)
    24 of 76 notices are Open (32%).
  • Route not published20%(15 notices)
    15 of 76 notices are Route not published (20%).
  • Limited / restricted12%(9 notices)
    9 of 76 notices are Limited / restricted (12%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 9 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

6robust · n=911.1% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 8 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

56 daysrobust · n=8
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 77 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

018 of 77 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 8 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimaterobust · n=8

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Bucher Municipal Limited35.5%3321 Aug 2025
RUTLAND DRAINAGE LIMITED35.5%33—
CIVICA ELECTION SERVICES LIMITED23.6%2224 Mar 2026
Southbay Civil Engineering Ltdframework/DPS on 123.6%22—
Gavin Jones Ltdframework/DPS on 223.6%141 Oct 2026
Golden Tree Surgeonsframework/DPS on 223.6%1330 Sept 2026
Chas D. Allflatt Limitedframework/DPS on 123.6%12—
John O'Conner Grounds Maintenance Ltdframework/DPS on 223.6%1230 Sept 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 15% of 55 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 56 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£5.0mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 33 of 33 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 54%; a further 22 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£62k middle valuerobust · n=33Middle half £42k–£169k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Refurbishment and re-modelling work to Custom House, King's LynnKing and Company Norfolk Ltd—10 mo£1,288,373 †
Management and Maintenance contract for West Norfolk Property LtdTHE LEADERS ROMANS BIDCO LIMITED15 Sept 20261 yrs · up to 4 yrs£532,896
≈ £533k/yr
Election Printing & SoftwareCIVICA ELECTION SERVICES LIMITED—2 yrs · up to 3 yrs£300,000
≈ £150k/yr
Election printing & softwareCIVICA ELECTION SERVICES LIMITED24 Mar 20261.2 yrs · up to 3.2 yrs£300,000
≈ £257k/yr
Payment Service Provider Fees for 'Metric' Car Parking MachinesMetric Group Ltd6 Jul 20265 yrs£300,000
≈ £60k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

55 of 55 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 23 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 79 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
CCTV Control Room ConsolesAwarded / complete3 Jul 2026—
Toilet Refurbishment at Mintlyn CrematoriumAwarded / complete1 Jul 2026—
Sewage pumping station replacement pumpsAwarded / complete19 Jun 2026—
Contract Planning OfficerAwarded / complete19 Jun 2026—
Taxi Testing CentresRepair and maintenance services of motor vehicles and associated equipmentOpen18 Jun 2026£150,000
Security Provision across King’s Lynn and West NorfolkPublic security servicesPlanning10 Jun 2026£318,000
Electoral Services Manager temporary coverAwarded / complete9 Jun 2026—
Replacement of Sewage Treatment WorksAwarded / complete4 Jun 2026—
Pay and display tickets for ‘Metric’ and ‘Arrive’ ticket machinesTicketsPlanning3 Jun 2026£252,000
Election Printing & SoftwareAwarded / complete1 Jun 2026—
Foul Water Drainage ConsultantEnvironmental planningAwarded / complete28 May 2026£134,400
Strategic Flood Risk Assessment and Water Cycle StudyEnvironmental planningAwarded / complete28 May 2026£120,000
Supply of temporary chartered surveyorAwarded / complete8 May 2026—
Coastal Defence Works - Window SamplingAwarded / complete30 Apr 2026—
Immersive Media Design for St George's Guildhall King's LynnDesign consultancy servicesAwarded / complete30 Apr 2026£150,000
Principal Designer under Building Safety Act 2023Awarded / complete8 Apr 2026—
Management and Maintenance contract for West Norfolk Property LtdBuilding and facilities management servicesPlanning26 Mar 2026£800,000
Cleaning Services across King’s Lynn and West Norfolk4 lotsBuilding-cleaning servicesAwarded / complete26 Mar 2026£210,000
Hunstanton Coastal Defence Emergency WorksAwarded / complete11 Mar 2026—
Fundraising Consultant for St George's Guildhall and Creative Hub ProjectDevelopment consultancy servicesAwarded / complete24 Feb 2026£40,000

Search all 79 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 55 of 55 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.