Steer Davies & Gleave Ltd: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards
Large organisation·Companies House: Private Limited Company·London·Nationwide (UK)·Main market: Consultative engineering and construction services
Official UK PPONPMCH-6153-LHBW
i
How many tenders this supplier has won.
Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.
i
How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.
Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.
i
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.
Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Where this supplier has delivered.
Delivery regions published on its awarded tenders. A tender with several regions counts in each.
Where the work was, not where the company is based.
Where they wini
In which categories this supplier wins.
Its awards by the category (CPV) of the lot won. An award to the whole procedure, with no lot named, counts once under the procedure’s main category.
i
In which categories this supplier wins.
Its awards by the category (CPV) of the lot won. An award to the whole procedure, with no lot named, counts once under the procedure’s main category.
61 awards (53 for a named lot, 87%, 8 for a whole procedure with no lot named; pending awards included) · top CPV classes, shares of all 61
7131 Consultative engineering and construction services24 awards · 39% · 19 lots + 5 whole-procedure6617 Financial consultancy, financial transaction processing and clearing-house services7 awards · 11% · lots7941 Business and management consultancy services5 awards · 8% · lots3012 Photocopying and offset printing equipment3 awards · 5% · lots7931 Market research services3 awards · 5% · lots7124 Architectural, engineering and planning services2 awards · 3% · lots3115 Ballasts for discharge lamps or tubes1 awards · 2% · lots6014 Non-scheduled passenger transport1 awards · 2% · lotsi
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
What one of this supplier’s wins is usually worth.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
i
Does this supplier usually win above or below the buyer’s estimate.
Its own wins, estimate against award per lot, in its sector.
Based on 2 wins in its industry (CPV division 71). Small sample.
A past pattern, not a margin and not a price to bid.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Authority | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transport for the South East Technical Call-off Contract | East Sussex County Council | — | — | £3,000,000 † |
| Wider Economic and Social Impacts Partner | Transport for the North | — | — | £700,000 † |
| Land & Maritime Transport Portfolio – Monitoring and Evaluation Programme Phase 3: Monitoring of Outputs and Outcomes | UK Research and Innovation | — | — | £549,750 † |
| Ticketless Travel Surveys | TRANSPORT UK EAST MIDLANDS LIMITED | 24 Jun 2025 | 1.7 yrs · up to 3.7 yrs | £525,600 ≈ £315k/yr |
| ESCC Local Transport Plan | East Sussex County Council | — | — | £233,910 † |
Where they deliveri
Where this supplier has delivered.
Delivery regions published on its awarded tenders. A tender with several regions counts in each.
Where the work was, not where the company is based.
i
Where this supplier has delivered.
Delivery regions published on its awarded tenders. A tender with several regions counts in each.
Where the work was, not where the company is based.
ITL1 delivery regions on the notice · 42 of 44 awarded procedures publish one · a procedure with several regions counts in each
Who they sell toi
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
i
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier
i
What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.
Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.
Local authority43%(26 awards)
26 of 61 awards are Local authority (43%).Central government28%(17 awards)
17 of 61 awards are Central government (28%).Type not classified26%(16 awards)
16 of 61 awards are Type not classified (26%).Other public body3%(2 awards)
2 of 61 awards are Other public body (3%).
| Authority | Procedures | Share | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department for Transport | 5 | 11.4% | 9 | 1 Oct 2026 |
| Civil Aviation Authority | 2 | 4.5% | 7 | 20 Mar 2025 |
| ESPO | 2 | 4.5% | 3 | 31 Jan 2024 |
| East Sussex County Council | 2 | 4.5% | 2 | 18 Jul 2023 |
| West Midlands Combined Authority | 2 | 4.5% | 2 | 5 May 2026 |
| Transport for Greater Manchester | 1 | 2.3% | 4 | 15 Apr 2025 |
| Government Commercial Agency | 1 | 2.3% | 3 | 13 Oct 2025 |
| Tees Valley Combined Authority Group, and Teesside International Airport | 1 | 2.3% | 2 | 7 Nov 2023 |
Share = of the 44 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
Published end dates only · 56 of 61 awards carry one · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|
| Dover White Cliffs- Feasibility Assessment | 31 Dec 2026 | £72,250 |
| Accessible and Sustainable Transport and Placemaking | 28 Feb 2027 | £74,555 |
| EVI Consultancy - CRSTS | 31 Mar 2027 | £27,825 |
| City Centre Parking Review 2026 | 31 Mar 2027 | £29,968 |
| Lot 1 - Transport Professional Services | 22 Oct 2027 | £350,000,000 |
| Lot 2 - Transport Data Services | 22 Oct 2027 | £400,000,000 |
| Lot 6 - Zero Emission Vehicle Infrastructure | 22 Oct 2027 | £500,000,000 |
Recent awards
Latest 30 of 61 award records naming this supplier
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
- Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
- Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
- Contract end dates. Published on 56 of 61 awards; those feed “Contracts ending”.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.