Landbuild ltd: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards
SME·Companies House: Private Limited Company·Pulborough·South East England·Main market: Construction work for pipelines, communication and power lines, for highways, roads, airfields and railways; flatwork
Companies House04134776 ↗
i
How many tenders this supplier has won.
Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.
i
How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.
Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.
i
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.
Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Where this supplier has delivered.
Delivery regions published on its awarded tenders. A tender with several regions counts in each.
Where the work was, not where the company is based.
Where they wini
In which categories this supplier wins.
Its awards by the category (CPV) of the lot won. An award to the whole procedure, with no lot named, counts once under the procedure’s main category.
i
In which categories this supplier wins.
Its awards by the category (CPV) of the lot won. An award to the whole procedure, with no lot named, counts once under the procedure’s main category.
8 awards (7 for a named lot, 88%, 1 for a whole procedure with no lot named; pending awards included) · top CPV classes, shares of all 8
4523 Construction work for pipelines, communication and power lines, for highways, roads, airfields and railways; flatwork3 awards · 38% · lots4510 Site preparation work1 awards · 13% · lots4520 Works for complete or part construction and civil engineering work1 awards · 13% · lotsi
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
What one of this supplier’s wins is usually worth.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
i
Does this supplier usually win above or below the buyer’s estimate.
Its own wins, estimate against award per lot, in its sector.
Based on 2 wins in its industry (CPV division 45). Small sample.
A past pattern, not a margin and not a price to bid.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Authority | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crawley Borough Council- Station Gateway Phase 1 | Crawley Borough Council | — | 2 yrs | £3,100,182 † ≈ £1.6m/yr |
| Replacement IT Network Infrastructure - External Campus Enabling Works | University of Sussex | — | — | £2,562,765 † |
| MSDC Capital Drainage Works at Noah's Ark Lane, Lindfield | Mid Sussex District Council | — | 1 mo | £99,041 † |
| Operation Watershed - King George V Playing Field | Worth Parish Council | — | 1 mo | £73,947 † |
| Parking Scheme at Bowers Place, Crawley Down, West Sussex, RH10 4HY | Worth Parish Council | 12 Jan 2026 | 1 mo | £46,681 |
Where they deliveri
Where this supplier has delivered.
Delivery regions published on its awarded tenders. A tender with several regions counts in each.
Where the work was, not where the company is based.
i
Where this supplier has delivered.
Delivery regions published on its awarded tenders. A tender with several regions counts in each.
Where the work was, not where the company is based.
ITL1 delivery regions on the notice · 7 of 7 awarded procedures publish one · a procedure with several regions counts in each
Who they sell toi
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
i
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier
i
What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.
Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.
Local authority88%(7 awards)
7 of 8 awards are Local authority (88%).Education13%(1 awards)
1 of 8 awards are Education (13%).
| Authority | Procedures | Share | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Worth Parish Council | 2 | 28.6% | 2 | 18 May 2026 |
| Crawley Borough Council | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 21 Nov 2025 |
| University of Sussex | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 3 Nov 2023 |
| Mid Sussex District Council | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 26 Aug 2026 |
| Adur District Council | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 17 Jul 2025 |
| West Sussex County Council | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 31 Mar 2024 |
Share = of the 7 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
Published end dates only · 6 of 7 awards carry one · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|
| Station Gateway Phase 1 | 19 Nov 2027 | £3,100,182 |
| Infrastructure Improvement | 31 Mar 2028 | £11,600,000 |
Recent awards
Latest 7 of 7 award records naming this supplier
| Award / procedure | Authority | Awarded | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parking Scheme at Bowers Place, Crawley Down, West Sussex, RH10 4HY | Worth Parish Council | 12 Jan 2026 | £46,681 |
| Mill Lane Groundsmen Compound | Adur District Council | 17 Jul 2025 | £41,880 |
| MSDC Capital Drainage Works at Noah's Ark Lane, Lindfield | Mid Sussex District Council | Not published | £99,041 † from the contract notice |
| Operation Watershed - King George V Playing Field | Worth Parish Council | Not published | £73,947 † from the contract notice |
| Crawley Borough Council- Station Gateway Phase 1 | Crawley Borough Council | Not published | £3,100,182 † from the contract notice |
| Replacement IT Network Infrastructure - External Campus Enabling Works | University of Sussex | Not published | £2,562,765 † from the contract notice |
| Infrastructure Improvement | West Sussex County Council | Not published | £11,600,000 † framework ceiling · not attributable revenue |
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
- Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
- Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
- Contract end dates. Published on 6 of 7 awards; those feed “Contracts ending”.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.