Architectural design services: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition

CPV 71220000Services · classin Architecture & Engineering

Open now21open for bids now · see them in the search
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months11180 contracting authorities · 322 in the catalogue
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot67% single-bid · 42 procedures, 36 months
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 42 lots from 42 competitions run by 35 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 21 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 6) and 21 from older notices (bids received, middle 6).

Last 36 months.

Typical contract value£81,250middle value of 138 contract awards, net · not frameworks
i

What a contract here is usually worth.

Middle value of published award values, VAT excluded. Framework ceilings are left out because they are not real contract values.

Based on 138 awards with a usable value, last 36 months.

Published values, not actual spend.

Last 36 months.

Deadline to award73 daysmiddle value · 22 awarded procedures
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Based on 22 decided competitions, last 36 months.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Newest open tenders

2 of 21 open for bids now · newest first

NoticeAuthorityDeadlineDays leftPublished value
PRN26130 Integrated Design Team - Clarawood House, BelfastChoice Housing6 Nov 202622h£250,000
COV - Multi‑Disciplinary Design Team Framework 2027FrameworkCoventry City Council16 Nov 202611d£5,000,000 ceiling

See all 21 open tenders →

Codes and neighbouring classes

The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division

Who buys
i

Which buyers publish the most notices here.

Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.

All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name

Buyer type
i

What kinds of public bodies buy here.

Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.

  • Local authorities43%(134 notices)
    134 of 315 notices are Local authorities (43%).
  • Central government15%(48 notices)
    48 of 315 notices are Central government (15%).
  • Education & universities14%(45 notices)
    45 of 315 notices are Education & universities (14%).
  • Other public bodies10%(33 notices)
    33 of 315 notices are Other public bodies (10%).
  • Police, fire & emergency2%(5 notices)
    5 of 315 notices are Police, fire & emergency (2%).
  • Not classified16%(50 notices)
    50 of 315 notices are Not classified (16%).
Contracting authorityTypeNoticesLast 12 monthsOpen now
the Education AuthorityEducation & universities16140
Ards and North Down Borough CouncilLocal authorities700
City of London CorporationLocal authorities700
Moray CouncilLocal authorities500
The Mayor and Commonalty and Citizens of the City of LondonLocal authorities540
Westminster City CouncilLocal authorities510
Choice HousingOther public bodies411
Argyll and Bute CouncilLocal authorities410
Belfast City CouncilLocal authorities410
London Borough of CamdenLocal authorities440

213 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.

Where the work is delivered
i

Where the work on these notices is delivered.

Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.

Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.

Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 265 of 322 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region

RegionNoticesBids / lotSME winsLocal wins
Greater London58 · 22%689%66%
Scotland38 · 14%———
Northern Ireland37 · 14%4——
South East England34 · 13%—86%35%
South West England33 · 12%—60%26%
East of England27 · 10%—91%24%
Yorkshire and the Humber25 · 9%—83%41%
North East England23 · 9%—58%45%
East Midlands22 · 8%——24%
North West England22 · 8%———
West Midlands20 · 8%———
Wales (Cymru)17 · 6%———

Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.

How it is bought
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract93%(300 notices)
    300 of 322 notices are Contract (93%).
  • Framework7%(21 notices)
    21 of 322 notices are Framework (7%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system0%(1 notice)
    1 of 322 notices is Dynamic purchasing system (0%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open31%(100 notices)
    100 of 322 notices are Open (31%).
  • Selective28%(91 notices)
    91 of 322 notices are Selective (28%).
  • Limited / restricted15%(49 notices)
    49 of 322 notices are Limited / restricted (15%).
  • Direct award15%(48 notices)
    48 of 322 notices are Direct award (15%).
  • Route not published11%(34 notices)
    34 of 322 notices are Route not published (11%).
Threshold
i

How much of this market is above the legal threshold.

Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.

  • Above threshold71%(48 notices)
    48 of 68 notices are Above threshold (71%).
  • Below threshold29%(20 notices)
    20 of 68 notices are Below threshold (29%).
Typical tender window
i

How long bidders get to respond.

Middle value in days from the tender notice to its deadline.

All notices we hold, not just recent ones.

30 daysrobust · n=72middle value, notice to deadline

Competition

Contracts published in the last 36 months (194) · bid counts per lot from award notices · values are net contract awards, framework and DPS ceilings excluded · SME and local status as declared

Bids per lot · n=42
i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

  • 1 bid7%(3)
    3 of 42 lots fall in 1 bid (7%).
  • 2–310%(4)
    4 of 42 lots fall in 2–3 (10%).
  • 4–636%(15)
    15 of 42 lots fall in 4–6 (36%).
  • 7 or more48%(20)
    20 of 42 lots fall in 7 or more (48%).
Contract value, net
i

The usual range of contract values here.

The middle half of published award values, VAT excluded, with the middle value marked. Framework ceilings are left out.

Published values, not actual spend.

p25 £34,375middle value £81,250p75 £244,175
interquartile range of 138 awards · p90 £705,446
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 42 lots from 42 competitions run by 35 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 21 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 6) and 21 from older notices (bids received, middle 6).

Last 36 months.

6robust · n=42middle half 4–13
Competed
i

How much of this market is actually put out to competition.

Notices run as an open or selective procedure, out of all notices that say which procedure was used. Direct awards count as not competed.

91 of 181 notices that state a procedure, last 36 months. 13 more are call-offs or give no procedure and are left out.

Last 36 months.

50%robust · n=181
Bids from SMEs
i

What share of bids come from small and medium firms.

SME bids divided by all bids, on lots where the buyer published the split.

310 SME bids out of 368, on 37 lots where the buyer published the split.

Last 36 months.

84%robust · n=368
Awards won by SMEs
i

What share of contracts go to small and medium firms.

Awards to a single supplier that declared its size. SME divided by all.

81 of 103 awards where the winner declared its size.

Last 36 months.

79%robust · n=103
Won locally
i

How much work here goes to companies based in the region.

Contract awards where the winner’s registered address is in this region, out of awards where the address is known.

Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.

Last 36 months.

70%robust · n=107winner registered in the delivery region
Winning award vs estimate
i

Do winners come in above or below the buyer’s estimate.

For each lot we compare the published estimate with the award, like for like. Below means the winner was paid less than estimated, above means more.

Based on 33 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 36 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 36 months.

2% below the estimaterobust · n=3316 below · 9 above
Abandoned
i

How often a tender ends with no award.

Notices cancelled, withdrawn or marked unsuccessful, plus terminated ones that never got an award.

4 of 194 notices, last 36 months.

Only what buyers published. Tenders that quietly went nowhere are not counted.

Last 36 months.

2%robust · n=194

Who wins
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 219 awards to 180 suppliers · the five most frequent winners hold 9% of contract awards in the last 36 months

Where to submit
i

Where bids for this work are submitted.

Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.

E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 128 of 322 notices name one · each portal page explains registration

Proactis / ProContract18 notices · 14%
eTendersNI16 notices · 13% · 1 open
In-tend Electronic Procurement16 notices · 13% · 1 open
Delta eSourcing15 notices · 12%
JAGGAER / BravoSolution10 notices · 8%
myTenders7 notices · 5%

Open tenders in architectural design services

21 open for bids now · soonest deadline first

NoticeAuthorityDeadlineDays leftPublished value
PRN26130 Integrated Design Team - Clarawood House, BelfastChoice Housing6 Nov 202622h£250,000
COV - Multi‑Disciplinary Design Team Framework 2027FrameworkCoventry City Council16 Nov 202611d£5,000,000 ceiling

All 21 open notices with CPV 7122… →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly. Contracts Finder contracts appear on the Retender Radar, not yet in these figures.
  • What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 7122. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2021 to 3 Nov 2026.
  • Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
  • Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.