Heritage Fund: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Central governmentGreater LondonLondonRan 1 procurement for other authorities

Official UK PPONPXVH-5968-TCRD

Open now1next deadline 6 Nov 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months21+600% vs prior 12 months (3)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share43%of 14 awarded procedures · 17 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

14 awarded tenders, 17 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months11 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£1.9mnet · on 13 of 13 published values · top 5 = 86%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

1 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
Copywriting Services Framework6 Nov 202615d£40,000

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 24 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract96%(23 notices)
    23 of 24 notices are Contract (96%).
  • Framework4%(1 notices)
    1 of 24 notices are Framework (4%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open42%(10 notices)
    10 of 24 notices are Open (42%).
  • Limited / restricted29%(7 notices)
    7 of 24 notices are Limited / restricted (29%).
  • Route not published17%(4 notices)
    4 of 24 notices are Route not published (17%).
  • Direct award13%(3 notices)
    3 of 24 notices are Direct award (13%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 1 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3indicative · n=10% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 24 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

00 of 24 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0.1% below estimateindicative · n=1

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Nature Positive Ltd214.3%2215 Dec 2025
Urban Foresight Ltd214.3%2223 Feb 2026
3ADAPT LIMITED214.3%227 Jul 2026
Upstream Research Ltd17.1%1314 Dec 2025
Workday Ltd17.1%12—
Randox Laboratories Ltd17.1%1110 Aug 2026
AXIS12 LTD17.1%1120 Jan 2026
Wavehill Ltd17.1%1127 Oct 2025

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 43% of 14 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 17 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£1.9mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 13 of 13 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 86%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£42k middle valuerobust · n=13Middle half £32k–£53k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Salesforce RenewalSalesforce UK Limited5 May 20262.1 yrs · up to 4.1 yrs£780,785
≈ £375k/yr
Website Support and MaintenanceAXIS12 LTD—3 yrs£429,000
≈ £143k/yr
HR Ecosystem RefreshWorkday Ltd——£325,000 †
Health Referral AssessmentsRandox Laboratories Ltd10 Aug 20263 yrs£53,063
≈ £18k/yr
Digital Asset Management ServicesBRANDSTENCIL LTD7 Aug 20263 yrs£45,698
≈ £15k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published end dates only · 4 of 6 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

ContractHolderEndsPublished value
Carbon Footprint Measurement Project3ADAPT LIMITED30 Nov 2026£37,330

Recent procedures

Latest 25 of 24 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Supply Chain and Social Value ConsultancyBusiness services: lawOpen5 Nov 2025£24,000
NHMF 0365 Film Makers FrameworkFrameworkMotion picture and video production servicesOpen14 Oct 2025£90,000
NHMF 0363 Provision of Evaluation Services - Heritage Innovation FundBusiness and management consultancy and related servicesOpen9 Oct 2025£28,000
Landscape Connections Evaluation Design ServicesBusiness and management consultancy and related servicesOpen15 Sept 2025£32,000

Search all 24 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 4 of 6 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.