Financial Ombudsman Service Limited: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: PRI/LTD BY GUAR/NSC (Private, limited by guarantee, no share capital)Greater LondonLondon

Companies House03725015 ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months18-5% vs prior 12 months (19)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share32%of 38 awarded procedures · 29 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

38 awarded tenders, 29 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months6none within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£19mnet · on 18 of 18 published values · top 5 = 96%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 37 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract95%(35 notices)
    35 of 37 notices are Contract (95%).
  • Framework5%(2 notices)
    2 of 37 notices are Framework (5%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted62%(23 notices)
    23 of 37 notices are Limited / restricted (62%).
  • Route not published16%(6 notices)
    6 of 37 notices are Route not published (16%).
  • Direct award14%(5 notices)
    5 of 37 notices are Direct award (14%).
  • Open8%(3 notices)
    3 of 37 notices are Open (8%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 1 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

5indicative · n=10% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 37 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

03 of 37 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Softcat Plc718.4%7720 Feb 2026
Phoenix Software Ltd37.9%3318 Mar 2026
Thomas Reuters (Professional) UK Ltd25.3%2219 May 2026
Bright Links (UK) Limited25.3%22—
Anything Is Possible Media Limited12.6%11—
Bytes Software Services Ltd12.6%11—
Computacenter12.6%11—
Matrix SCM12.6%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 32% of 38 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 29 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£19mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 18 of 18 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 96%; a further 12 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£79k middle valuerobust · n=18Middle half £42k–£152k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Microsoft ESA/SCE RenewalPhoenix Software Ltd——£17,550,000 †
Media Planning and BuyingAnything Is Possible Media Limited——£445,000 †
Oracle Support RenewalPhoenix Software Ltd—1 yrs£167,898 †
≈ £168k/yr
VMware Cloud FoundationSoftcat Plc—1.5 yrs£154,735 †
≈ £103k/yr
F5 Enterprise AgreementSoftcat Plc——£153,841 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published end dates only · 25 of 35 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 43 of 43 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Legal Matter Management SystemAwarded / complete15 Oct 2026—
Hornbill Subscription and MaintenanceFrameworkcentral purchasing bodyIT services: consultingAwarded / complete25 Sept 2026—
The provision of an Executive and Board Recruitment Partner (ten_1062)Recruitment servicesAwarded / complete23 Sept 2026£192,000
The Provision of Workplace Assessments and Adjustment ServicesCompany health servicesOpen29 Jul 2026£324,500
Nintex SupportAwarded / complete25 Jun 2026—
F5 Enterprise AgreementSoftware package and information systemsAwarded / complete2 Jun 2026—
Practical Law SubscriptionAwarded / complete19 May 2026—
Westlaw UK SubscriptionAwarded / complete19 May 2026—
EME - RFI - Electric Vehicle Scheme - Employee BenefitsElectric vehiclesPlanning27 Apr 2026—
VMware Cloud FoundationAwarded / complete27 Apr 2026—
Value Added Software Reseller FrameworkFrameworkSoftware package and information systemsPlanning20 Apr 2026—
Adobe Licence SubscriptionAwarded / complete18 Mar 2026—
Microsoft ESA/SCE RenewalSoftware package and information systemsAwarded / complete5 Mar 2026—
Octopus Server Edition Licence SubscriptionAwarded / complete20 Feb 2026—
User Acceptance Testing SoftwareAwarded / complete9 Jan 2026—
The provision of the design and delivery of a leadership development training programmeCoaching servicesOpen6 Jan 2026£230,000
Gym Management ServicesAwarded / complete12 Dec 2025—
Background Checking ServicesAwarded / complete24 Nov 2025—
Media Planning and BuyingMarket and economic research; polling and statisticsAwarded / complete14 Oct 2025—
Creative ServicesAwarded / complete14 Oct 2025—

Search all 43 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 25 of 35 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.