Connick Tree Services Ltd: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

SMECompanies House: Private Limited CompanyReigateSouth East EnglandMain market: Logging services

Companies House04885914 ↗ · Active

Where they win
i

19 awards (19 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 19 awards. An award may cover more than one class.

7721 Logging services15 awards · 79% · awards naming a lot
0345 Tree-nursery products1 award · 5% · awards naming a lot
7710 Agricultural services1 award · 5% · awards naming a lot
7730 Horticultural services1 award · 5% · awards naming a lot
7731 Planting and maintenance services of green areas1 award · 5% · awards naming a lot
Attributable award value
i
£1.9mOn 2 of 19 award records; the five largest make 100%; a further 1 published a VAT-inclusive amount only ( inc. VAT, kept apart). Largest rows below.
Award vs estimate
i

Based on 1 wins in its industry (CPV division 77). Small sample.

0% at estimateindicative · n=1compared within CPV division 77
Largest published awards
i
AuthorityAwardedTermPublished value
Contract for the provision of Arboricultural Services for trees on Non-Highways LandBrighton and Hove City Council——£1,353,000 †
InspectionsHorsham District Council——£545,900 †

Where their buyers are
i

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 13 of 13 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

South East England10 procedures · 77%
East Midlands1 procedure · 8%
East of England1 procedure · 8%
Greater London1 procedure · 8%

Bidding record
i

Procurement Act 2023 award notices name every bidder · 1 notice names this supplier since 19 Oct 2026 · observed bids, not an estimate

Contract lots contested
i
0 won · 1 lostindicative · n=1Fewer than three decided lots: no rate is claimed.
Authorities bid for
i
1Bid for and never won with 1 of them on contract lots.

Bidder names come from Procurement Act 2023 award notices, which list every bidder (from 2025). Older notices name no bidders, so earlier contests do not appear here. Latest ten notices shown.

Who they sell to
i

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i
  • Local authority74%(14 awards)
    14 of 19 awards are Local authority (74%).
  • Type not classified16%(3 awards)
    3 of 19 awards are Type not classified (16%).
  • Other public body11%(2 awards)
    2 of 19 awards are Other public body (11%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
Horsham District Council215.4%231 Mar 2025
Oxfordshire County Councilframework/DPS on 117.7%1223 Jul 2026
Brighton and Hove City Council17.7%120 Jul 2023
BHCC City Parks17.7%112 Jun 2023
Adur and Worthing Councils17.7%130 Mar 2023
ESPOframework/DPS on 117.7%15 Jan 2021
Delta Housing Limited17.7%120 Jul 2026
South Downs National Park Authorityframework/DPS on 117.7%111 May 2026

Share = of the 13 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Contracts ending
i

9 of 24 awards carry an end date, 2 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

ContractEndsPublished value
Countryside Services Framework31 Mar 2028£6,000,000 ceiling

Recent awards

Latest 19 of 19 award records naming this supplier

Contracts Finder adds 5 more procedures won by this supplier, mostly below the Find a Tender threshold or from before 2025. Each is counted once beside any Find a Tender copy; they are in the totals, not in this list.

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
ree Care Framework Lot 1 - Oxford CityOxfordshire County Council2 Jul 2026£1,000,000
framework ceiling · 1 of 9 appointed suppliers
Tree Care Framework Lot 3 - South OxfordshireOxfordshire County Council2 Jul 2026£1,000,000
framework ceiling · 1 of 4 appointed suppliers
Tree Care Framework Lot 4 - Vale of White HorseOxfordshire County Council2 Jul 2026£1,000,000
framework ceiling · 1 of 4 appointed suppliers
Single supplier framework for the Provision of Specialist Arboricultural advice for South Downs National Park Authority PlanningSouth Downs National Park AuthorityNot publishedNot published
Greenwich Park and associated estateThe Royal Parks LtdNot published£4,400,000 †
framework ceiling · not attributable revenue
InspectionsHorsham District CouncilNot published£545,900 †
from the contract notice
Arboriculture Services - EssexMoat Homes LimitedNot publishedNot published
Contract for the provision of Arboricultural Services for trees on Non-Highways LandBrighton and Hove City CouncilNot published£1,353,000 †
from the contract notice
Arboriculture ServicesESPONot published£10,000,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 5 appointed suppliers
About this data
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions in the buyer chart describe the buyer office, not where the work is delivered or the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 7 of 24 awards, estimated from the published duration on 2 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”. Published values in that list come from either source; Contracts Finder figures are shown as published and stay out of this profile’s money totals.
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender and Contracts Finder), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0, updated through the day and rebuilt nightly. Not every figure uses both feeds, and each one shows how many records it rests on: see the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.