Bond Bryan Architects: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

Companies House: Private Limited CompanySheffieldNationwide (UK)Main market: Consultative engineering and construction services

Companies House06296993 ↗ · ActiveWebsitebondbryan.co.uk ↗

Where they win
i

9 awards (9 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 9 awards. An award may cover more than one class.

7120 Architectural and related services2 awards · 22% · awards naming a lot
7131 Consultative engineering and construction services2 awards · 22% · awards naming a lot
7124 Architectural, engineering and planning services1 award · 11% · awards naming a lot
7150 Construction-related services1 award · 11% · awards naming a lot
Attributable award value
i
£3.8mOn 5 of 9 award records; the five largest make 100%. Largest rows below.
Typical attributable award
i
£405k middle valuerobust · n=5
Award vs estimate
i

Based on 1 wins in its industry (CPV division 71). Small sample.

19.3% below estimateindicative · n=1compared within CPV division 71

Where their buyers are
i

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 18 of 18 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

Greater London9 procedures · 50%
North East England2 procedures · 11%
Yorkshire and the Humber2 procedures · 11%
West Midlands2 procedures · 11%
North West England1 procedure · 6%
East Midlands1 procedure · 6%
South East England1 procedure · 6%

Bidding record
i

Procurement Act 2023 award notices name every bidder · 1 notice names this supplier since 14 Oct 2026 · observed bids, not an estimate

Contract lots contested
i
0 won · 0 lostFewer than three decided lots: no rate is claimed.
Framework / DPS places
i
0 of 1
Authorities bid for
i
1
NoticeAuthorityOutcomeBiddersPublished
UKRI-4453 BAU Professional Services Frameworkframework/DPSUK Research & Innovation (UKRI)not appointed3914 Oct 2026

Bidder names come from Procurement Act 2023 award notices, which list every bidder (from 2025). Older notices name no bidders, so earlier contests do not appear here. Latest ten notices shown.

Who they sell to
i

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i
  • Local authority44%(4 awards)
    4 of 9 awards are Local authority (44%).
  • Education33%(3 awards)
    3 of 9 awards are Education (33%).
  • Charity11%(1 award)
    1 of 9 awards is Charity (11%).
  • Type not classified11%(1 award)
    1 of 9 awards is Type not classified (11%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
London Borough of Haringey211.1%23 Sept 2024
City of London Corporation211.1%213 Aug 2024
Department for Education211.1%210 Oct 2020
London Borough of Bromley15.6%121 Oct 2026
NCG15.6%115 Jul 2026
Bradford College15.6%120 Oct 2025
Nuneaton & Bedworth BC (NUN)framework/DPS on 115.6%18 Sept 2021
Kirklees Councilframework/DPS on 115.6%123 May 2021

Share = of the 18 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Contracts ending
i

14 of 18 awards carry an end date, 4 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

ContractEndsPublished value
Architect appointment for Guildhall Yard East project29 Jan 2027 estimated£264,593
Lot 2: Architect Services18 Dec 2027 estimated£50,000,000 ceiling

Recent awards

Latest 9 of 9 award records naming this supplier

Contracts Finder adds 9 more procedures won by this supplier, mostly below the Find a Tender threshold or from before 2025. Each is counted once beside any Find a Tender copy; they are in the totals, not in this list.

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
Chipperfield Road Development Multidisciplinary Consultancy (RIBA 2-7)London Borough of Bromley21 Oct 2026£2,218,545
Lea House Refurbishment - Design TeamNCGNot published£405,344 †
from the contract notice
Architectural ServicesBradford CollegeNot published£150,000 †
from the contract notice
Milton Keynes College (MKC) ITT for Lead Designer/Architect & Planning Retained ServiceMilton Keynes CollegeNot published£100,000 †
joint award · 2 suppliers
Architectural Services for BuildingsLondon Borough of HaringeyNot published£736,282 †
from the contract notice
Architect appointment for Guildhall Yard East projectCity of London CorporationNot published£264,593 †
from the contract notice
Lot 2: Architect ServicesPROSPERNot published£50,000,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 24 appointed suppliers
Major Projects - Architectural design projectsNew City CollegeNot published£100,000 †
joint award · 5 suppliers
Lot 2 - Architect and Lead Designer ServicesNuneaton and Bedworth Borough CouncilNot published£5,000,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 6 appointed suppliers
About this data
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions in the buyer chart describe the buyer office, not where the work is delivered or the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 10 of 18 awards, estimated from the published duration on 4 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”. Published values in that list come from either source; Contracts Finder figures are shown as published and stay out of this profile’s money totals.
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender and Contracts Finder), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0, updated through the day and rebuilt nightly. Not every figure uses both feeds, and each one shows how many records it rests on: see the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.