RED BOX CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Private Limited CompanyDfE school register: Academy converterYorkshire and the HumberHARROGATERan 21 procurements for other authorities

Companies House05126781 ↗Websitenotredame.southwark.sch.uk ↗

Open now1next deadline 24 Nov 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months0-100% vs prior 12 months (1)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot3.525% single-bid · 4 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 4 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share29%of 24 awarded procedures · 20 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

24 awarded tenders, 20 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Open notices

1 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
Omega Multi-Academy Trust Cleaning Services TenderFrameworkprocuring entity24 Nov 202635d£0

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 1 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(1 notices)
    1 of 1 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open100%(1 notices)
    1 of 1 notices are Open (100%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 4 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3.5moderate · n=425% of lots drew a single bid
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 4 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimatemoderate · n=4

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Hutchison Catering Ltdframework/DPS on 1312.5%04—
Cleantec Services Limited312.5%03—
Aspens Services Limited28.3%03—
Caterlink28.3%02—
Mellors Catering Servicesframework/DPS on 128.3%02—
Impact Food Group Ltdframework/DPS on 128.3%02—
AAA Caring Caretaker Ltd14.2%01—
OCS UK&I LIMITED14.2%01—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 29% of 24 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 20 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 36 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Catering Services for Huddersfield New CollegeCatering servicesAwarded / complete20 Feb 2023—
Catering Services for St Joseph's Roman Catholic Primary SchoolCatering servicesOpen16 Dec 2022—
Award of Catering Services for Thomas MoreSchool cleaning servicesAwarded / complete28 Nov 2022—
Cleaning Services for Carlton Academy TrustSchool cleaning servicesOpen11 Nov 2022—
Catering Services for Thomas MoreCatering servicesCancelled30 Sept 2022—
Catering Services for Dartford Grammar School for GirlsSchool catering servicesOpen24 Jun 2022—
Catering Services Award at Bradgate Education PartnershipSchool catering servicesAwarded / complete9 Jun 2022—
Catering Services for Abbey Multi Academy TrustSchool catering servicesAwarded / complete4 May 2022—
Cleaning Services at Nidderdale High SchoolSchool cleaning servicesAwarded / complete22 Mar 2022—

Search all 36 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 0 of 30 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.