NORTHUMBRIA HEALTHCARE FACILITIES MANAGEMENT LIMITED: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Private Limited CompanyNorth East EnglandNewcastle Upon Tyne

Companies House07913048 ↗Websitenhfm.co.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months10-33% vs prior 12 months (15)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share19%of 27 awarded procedures · 32 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

27 awarded tenders, 32 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months41 within 6 months · 2 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£4.2mnet · on 8 of 15 published values · 7 repeated amounts set aside · top 5 = 83%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 25 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract92%(23 notices)
    23 of 25 notices are Contract (92%).
  • Framework8%(2 notices)
    2 of 25 notices are Framework (8%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted52%(13 notices)
    13 of 25 notices are Limited / restricted (52%).
  • Open36%(9 notices)
    9 of 25 notices are Open (36%).
  • Direct award8%(2 notices)
    2 of 25 notices are Direct award (8%).
  • Route not published4%(1 notices)
    1 of 25 notices are Route not published (4%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 2 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3indicative · n=250% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 25 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

02 of 25 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Softcat Plcframework/DPS on 1311.1%33—
CLINISYS SOLUTIONS LIMITEDframework/DPS on 113.7%14—
Nearby Eastcoast Taxis Limited13.7%14—
BLT Contracts Ltd - t/a Blueline Taxis13.7%12—
Concerto Support Services13.7%11—
NORDER DESIGN ASSOCIATES LIMITED13.7%114 Mar 2026
Netcall Technology Ltd13.7%11—
Turner & Townsend Limited13.7%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 19% of 27 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 32 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£4.2mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 8 of 15 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 83%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£325k middle valuerobust · n=8Middle half £260k–£441k; 7 awards with ambiguous equal values within a procedure excluded from both figures.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
NervecentreNervecentre Software Ltd——£1,855,000 †
Provision of IWMS Platform for Northumbria HealthcareConcerto Support Services——£631,472 †
Asset Verification exerciseTurner & Townsend Limited——£377,468 †
VW Motor Homes x6Lookers Group Fleet6 Oct 202511 mo£370,000
Contact Centre SolutionNetcall Technology Ltd——£279,976 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

23 of 41 contracts carry an end date, 12 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 48 of 48 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Design, Supply and Installation of Sterilisation EquipmentSterilisationPlanned13 Oct 2022—
Provision of Voice and Data ServicesTelecommunications servicesAwarded / complete8 Sept 2022—
NHCFT 429 Video Conferencing ServicesVideo conferencing software development servicesAwarded / complete16 Aug 2022—
Framework Agreement for the Provision of Sustainable Waste Conversion SolutionsFrameworkcentral purchasing bodyContainers for waste materialAwarded / complete19 May 2022£50,720,000
Framework Tender for the supply of Textile Healthcare Products (THP)Framework7 lotsLeather and textile fabricsOpen30 Mar 2022—
Provision, Installation and Inspection of Warehouse RackingArchive shelvingAwarded / complete14 Feb 2022£500,000
Supply of Gas for Northumbria Healthcare Facilities Management LtdMains gasOpen17 Dec 2021£21,000,000
Supply of Electricity for Northumbria Healthcare Facilities Management LtdElectricityOpen17 Dec 2021£10,000,000

Search all 48 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 23 of 41 published contracts have an end date; 12 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.