THE KEMNAL ACADEMIES TRUST: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: PRI/LBG/NSC (Private, Limited by guarantee, no share capital, use of 'Limited' exemption)Greater LondonSidcup

Companies House07348231 ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months4+33% vs prior 12 months (3)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Published award value, 24m£4.8mnet · on 8 of 8 published values · top 5 = 86%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 7 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(7 notices)
    7 of 7 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted57%(4 notices)
    4 of 7 notices are Limited / restricted (57%).
  • Route not published29%(2 notices)
    2 of 7 notices are Route not published (29%).
  • Open14%(1 notices)
    1 of 7 notices are Open (14%).
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 7 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

00 of 7 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Monitor Cleaning Services Ltd116.7%12—
Pendergate Ltd t/a Kindred116.7%12—
Pacific Support Services116.7%12—
Brayborne Facilities Services Ltd116.7%11—
GBM Digital Technologies Ltd (Trading as Sync)116.7%11—
Ridge Crest Cleaning Limited116.7%11—
INOVOLT LIMITEDframework/DPS on 1116.7%08—
Waller Associates Ltdframework/DPS on 1116.7%07—

6 awarded procedures across 51 suppliers: too few to describe concentration.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£4.8mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 8 of 8 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 86%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£491k middle valuerobust · n=8Middle half £292k–£1.0m.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Cleaning ServicesPendergate Ltd t/a Kindred——£1,111,239 †
Chichester High SchoolBrayborne Facilities Services Ltd——£1,048,992 †
Cleaning ServicesPendergate Ltd t/a Kindred——£1,014,734 †
Napier Community Primary School and 3 Willow Brook Primary School and NurseryRidge Crest Cleaning Limited——£640,666 †
Cleaning ServicesMonitor Cleaning Services Ltd——£342,035 †

Recent procedures

Latest 11 of 11 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Cleaning Services4 lotsCleaning servicesAwarded / complete17 Sept 2026—
Apple Authorised Education Specialist ResellerInformation technology servicesAwarded / complete17 Jun 2026—
Supply of a Secondary School Timetabling & Scheduling SolutionEducational software packagePlanning9 Mar 2026—
Stakeholder Engagement & Insights PlatformSoftware-related servicesOpen17 Feb 2026£0
Provision of Outsourced Cleaning Services3 lotsCleaning servicesAwarded / complete29 Aug 2025—
Cleaning Services2 lotsCleaning servicesAwarded / complete8 Jul 2025—
Gym Concession at Chichester High SchoolSports facilities operation servicesPlanning4 Jul 2025—
Integrated HR and Payroll System and Payroll Bureau ServicesSoftware package and information systemsOpen14 Nov 2023£1,500,000
The Kemnal Academies Trust - Provision of Occupational Health ServicesHealth servicesOpen4 Aug 2023£250,000
TKAT Asset Management Services Framework AgreementFramework12 lotsBuilding installation workAwarded / complete14 Dec 2022£22,000,000
Grounds Maintenance for TKAT Secondary Schools -Cleeve Park, Cleeve Meadow, Kemnal Technology College2 lotsHorticultural servicesAwarded / complete6 Oct 2022£240,000

Search all 11 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 0 of 23 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.