Mining Remediation Authority: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

GOV.UK register: Executive non-departmental public bodyCentral governmentEast MidlandsNottinghamshire

Official UK PPONPRPD-5825-QDVY

Open now2next deadline 6 Nov 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months65+110% vs prior 12 months (31)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot316.7% single-bid · 6 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share14%of 103 awarded procedures · 119 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

103 awarded tenders, 119 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months1911 within 6 months · 5 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£37mnet · on 71 of 71 published values · top 5 = 72%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

2 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
CA18/5956 Construction, Environmental & Technical Professional Services Framework (CETPS)Framework4 lots6 Nov 202615d£9,400,000
CA18/05985 Mine Entry Inspections FrameworkFramework10 Nov 202619d£0

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 96 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract89%(85 notices)
    85 of 96 notices are Contract (89%).
  • Framework11%(11 notices)
    11 of 96 notices are Framework (11%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted36%(35 notices)
    35 of 96 notices are Limited / restricted (36%).
  • Selective19%(18 notices)
    18 of 96 notices are Selective (19%).
  • Route not published19%(18 notices)
    18 of 96 notices are Route not published (19%).
  • Open14%(13 notices)
    13 of 96 notices are Open (14%).
  • Direct award13%(12 notices)
    12 of 96 notices are Direct award (13%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3robust · n=616.7% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 8 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

86 daysrobust · n=8
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 96 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

012 of 96 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 5 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

9.6% above estimaterobust · n=5

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Soil Engineering Geoservices Limitedframework/DPS on 265.8%312—
NAL Plant Ltdframework/DPS on 254.9%4627 Jan 2026
Llettyshenkin Construction Company Ltdframework/DPS on 254.9%4527 Jan 2026
Jim Davies Civil Engineering Ltdframework/DPS on 254.9%4527 Jan 2026
Bethell Construction Ltdframework/DPS on 243.9%3427 Jan 2026
Thomas Menzies (Builders) Ltdframework/DPS on 243.9%3427 Jan 2026
Northern Powergrid (Northeast) PLC32.9%343 Feb 2026
Phoenix Software Ltd32.9%33—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 14% of 103 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 119 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£37mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 71 of 71 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 72%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£69k middle valuerobust · n=71Middle half £38k–£188k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Strategic Systems Development & SupportCGI IT UK Limited28 Nov 20255 yrs · up to 8 yrs£19,682,041
≈ £3.9m/yr
Pay StructureKorn Ferry (UK) Limited—3 yrs£2,461,100 †
≈ £820k/yr
General Legal ServicesBrowne Jacobson LLP——£2,000,000 †
Phase 3.4 Capping and Reinstatement WorksBethell Construction Ltd—6 mo£1,652,686 †
Chester South Moor Pipe ReplacementEsh Construction——£1,023,587 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

92 of 156 contracts carry an end date, 33 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 19 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 148 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Windows 10 Extended Security Updates Year 2Awarded / complete9 Oct 2026—
CA18/05485Construction workAwarded / complete29 Sept 2026—
Solar PV Development FeasibilityAwarded / complete23 Sept 2026—
Wemyss Metal Mine WorksConstruction work for damsPlanning21 Sept 2026—
MRA Operation InSAR ProvisionAwarded / complete16 Sept 2026—
Property Valuation & Compensation SupportAwarded / complete8 Sept 2026—
HO - Customer Service Organisational Membership AgreementAwarded / complete7 Sept 2026—
West Cannock Pumping Test & Temporary TreatmentDredging and pumping worksAwarded / complete25 Aug 2026£1,200,000
Ground Stabilisation Works by Drilling and Grouting Framework RenewalFrameworkGeotechnical engineering servicesPlanning19 Aug 2026—
Ground Investigation Framework RenewalFrameworkEngineering servicesPlanning18 Aug 2026—
Langton Mine Water Treatment Scheme (MWTS) Design and BuildEnvironmental engineering consultancy servicesAwarded / complete31 Jul 2026—
HDS Treatment TrailsResearch and development services and related consultancy servicesPlanning22 Jul 2026—
Wireline Geologging & Topographical surveysFrameworkTopographical servicesPlanning15 Jul 2026£1,500,000
Pay StructureAwarded / complete13 Jul 2026—
Ground Investigations WorksGround investigation workAwarded / complete13 Jul 2026—
Ground InvestigationConstruction workAwarded / complete13 Jul 2026—
Ground Stabilisation Works by Drilling & Grouting-Construction workAwarded / complete13 Jul 2026—
Emergency Call Out and Minor Works -Awarded / complete13 Jul 2026—
Emergency Call Out and Minor WorksAwarded / complete13 Jul 2026—
Emergency Call Out and Minor WorksAwarded / complete13 Jul 2026—

Search all 148 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 92 of 156 published contracts have an end date; 33 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.