Official UK procurement notice
HDS Treatment Trails · UK public procurement notice
Authority: Mining Remediation Authority (Central government)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionThe Mining Remediation Authority (MRA) is undertaking this preliminary market engagement to better understand the availability of suppliers capable of delivering field-based High Density Sludge (HDS) pilot treatment trials for zinc bearing mine waters and to inform its procurement approach.
In particular, the MRA wishes to understand the extent of supplier capability and capacity within the market for these specialist services. The MRA is seeking to procure a specialist supplier to design, provide, mobilise, operate and report on containerised pilot-scale HDS treatment trials for metal-contaminated mine water at three sites: the former Threlkeld Lead Mines in Westmorland and Furness; Abbey Consols Mine in Ceredigion, Mid Wales; and a site within the Minsterley catchment, Shropshire. The trials are required to validate HDS treatment performance, establish optimised operating conditions and generate robust design, cost and operational data to inform potential full-scale mine water treatment schemes.
The requirement is for field-based HDS pilot trials suitable for zinc-rich mine waters with differing water chemistry. The Threlkeld trial will address net-acidic mine water with zinc as the primary contaminant and secondary metals including iron, aluminium, manganese, lead, cadmium, arsenic and nickel. The Abbey Consols trial will address circum-neutral pH mine water with zinc as the primary contaminant and secondary metals including iron, aluminium, manganese, lead, cadmium and nickel. The Minsterley trial will address zinc-rich circum-neutral mine water with lead and cadmium as key secondary contaminants. Flow conditions vary by site and the supplier will be expected to propose and operate an appropriate pilot configuration for each location, including suitable flow management, chemical dosing, monitoring and control arrangements.
The supplier will be required to provide and operate containerised HDS pilot plant and equipment capable of demonstrating removal of zinc and relevant secondary metals through appropriate precipitation, sludge recirculation and clarification processes. The trials shall determine optimum treatment conditions, including target operating pH, reagent selection and dosing approach, and may include aeration and/or carbon dioxide stripping capability where appropriate. The scope includes all activities necessary to plan, mobilise, operate, monitor, demobilise and report on the trials. This includes, but is not limited to, pilot plant design and configuration; supply of plant, equipment, chemicals and consumables; mobilisation and set-up; commissioning; operation of the pilot trials; sampling and analysis; process monitoring; solids handling; retention of representative sludge samples; provision of sludge material for WM3 classification and characterisation; data management; interpretation of results; and preparation of final technical reports.
The supplier must provide all necessary health, safety and environmental documentation and controls, including method statements, task and site-specific risk assessments, CoSHH assessments, safe systems of work, emergency procedures, PPE requirements and an environmental management plan. Elements of site security (CCTV, fencing) may also be required by the MRA. The trials are expected to be delivered under the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015. The supplier will be required to comply with all applicable UK health, safety and environmental legislation and to work in accordance with the MRA's site access, stakeholder, environmental and operational requirements.
Participation requirements are expected to include proven experience delivering HDS trials for metal-contaminated mine water, demonstrated experience in the treatment of zinc-bearing, net-acidic and/or circumneutral mine waters as applicable to the sites, and evidence of operating and optimising field-based pilot HDS trials. Suppliers must be able to demonstrate relevant technical capability, suitable field delivery experience, robust health and safety management, and the ability to produce high-quality trial data and recommendations for full-scale treatment design.
The key deliverables will include trial operation records and datasets; detailed testing methodology; performance assessments; optimised operating parameters; sludge characterisation samples and supporting information; and final reports containing conclusions and recommendations for full-scale treatment. The final outputs must provide sufficient evidence to support treatment process validation, full-scale design development, capital and operating cost estimation and future decision-making by the MRA.
The estimated value for each trial is expected to be in the range of £150,000 to £200,000 ex VAT. The anticipated duration of each trial is approximately six weeks, requirements currently expected to be delivered by 31 March 2027. The MRA may procure one or more of the site-specific trials under the same opportunity. The MRA may also procure more sites in the future under this notice.
CPV: Research and development services and related consultancy services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedPipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How Mining Remediation Authority buys Research and development services (CPV 73), and who usually turns up
Mining Remediation Authority’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Research and development services (CPV 73) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered in the region where that award was delivered.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards have an award date within 54 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid13% / 14%
2–338% / 26%
4–625% / 30%
7+25% / 30%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate29% / 52%
Within ±2%29% / 41%
Above estimate43% / 7%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1CPV 73Estimate not published
This lot lists more than one class in CPV 73. The comparison uses that group.
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 265 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid14%
2–326%
4–630%
7+30%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 22 Jul 2026, 10:41 BST
- Last source update
- 22 Jul 2026, 10:41 BST
- Authority reference
CA18/2/1/152- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-069018- Latest notice
- Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06d085Find a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
22 Jul 2026 → 28 Sept 2026 · 3 dates- Planning notice published93 days ago22 Jul 2026, 10:41 BST
- Market engagement65 days ago19 Aug 2026, 23:59 BST
Organisations wishing to express an interest in this opportunity should submit an Expression of Interest by email to [email protected] and [email protected]
The Expression of Interest should include:
- Organisation name, registered address and company registration number (where applicable).
- Primary contact name, job title, email address and telephone number.
- A brief summary of the organisation's experience in delivering Containerised High Density Sludge (HDS) treatment trials or comparable mine water treatment pilot projects.
- A summary of relevant experience working with metal-contaminated mine waters, including zinc-rich, net-acidic and/or circumneutral mine waters.
- Details of any relevant field-based pilot treatment trials delivered within the last five years.
- Confirmation of the organisation's ability to provide the required technical, operational, health and safety and environmental management resources.
- Any consortium, subcontracting or partnering arrangements proposed.
Following receipt of Expressions of Interest, the Mining Remediation Authority (MRA) may request additional information, clarifications and supporting evidence to verify the experience, technical capability and capacity stated within the submission. This may include, but is not limited to, project references, case studies, client testimonials, health and safety information, insurance details, accreditation certificates and examples of comparable work.
The MRA may use information obtained through this engagement to assess the availability of suitably qualified suppliers in the market and to inform the design of any subsequent procurement strategy. Submission of an Expression of Interest does not create any contractual obligation on the part of the MRA.
- Contract starts26 days ago28 Sept 2026, 00:00 BST
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Preliminary market engagement notice published22 Jul 2026, 10:41 BSTUK2
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (1)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender