Scottish Environment Protection Agency: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Central governmentScotlandHolytownCentral purchasing body on 7 of 11 notices

Official UK PPONPLQL-1246-RPXZWebsitesepa.org.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months2-78% vs prior 12 months (9)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share29%of 14 awarded procedures · 18 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

14 awarded tenders, 18 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months1none within 6 months · 1 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£1.7mnet · on 5 of 5 published values · top 5 = 100%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 11 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract91%(10 notices)
    10 of 11 notices are Contract (91%).
  • Framework9%(1 notices)
    1 of 11 notices are Framework (9%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Route not published55%(6 notices)
    6 of 11 notices are Route not published (55%).
  • Open27%(3 notices)
    3 of 11 notices are Open (27%).
  • Limited / restricted18%(2 notices)
    2 of 11 notices are Limited / restricted (18%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 2 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

9.5indicative · n=20% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 11 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

03 of 11 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
UK Health Security Agency214.3%02—
Ocean intelligence17.1%13—
RS Aqua Ltd17.1%12—
Carekem Limited17.1%11—
LabWare17.1%11—
University of Stirlingframework/DPS on 117.1%02—
HAYS SPECIALIST RECRUITMENT LIMITED17.1%01—
AECOM LIMITED17.1%01—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 29% of 14 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 18 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£1.7mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 5 of 5 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 100%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£371k middle valuerobust · n=5Middle half £325k–£387k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
CivTech 11.1 - How can technology help us to manage the impact of Marine Pen Fish Farms more sustainably?Ocean intelligence——£563,870 †
Supply and Delivery of 8 Wave Recording BuoysRS Aqua Ltd——£387,335 †
Supply and Delivery of 8 Wave Recording BuoysRS Aqua Ltd——£370,740 †
Supply, Delivery, Installation, Commissioning and Servicing of a Nutrient AnalyserCarekem Limited——£325,072 †
Laboratory Information Management System Annual Support & MaintenanceLabWare——£61,000 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

12 of 18 contracts carry an end date, 12 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

ContractHolderEndsPublished value
Provision of Agresso System Support ServicesHennessy IT Consulting Limited4 Jun 2027 estimated£360,000

Recent procedures

Latest 27 of 27 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
CivTech 11.1 - How can technology help us to manage the impact of Marine Pen Fish Farms more sustainably?central purchasing bodyIT services: consultingAwarded / complete7 Sept 2026£650,000
Provision of a Digital Delivery Partner for Development of an Integrated Digital PlatformIT services: consultingPlanning28 Aug 2026—
Ad Hoc Environmental Radioactivity Monitoring and Radiological Assessments FrameworkFramework2 lotsEnvironmental monitoring other than for constructionOpen25 Jun 2026—
Supply, Delivery, Installation, Commissioning and Servicing of a Nutrient Analysercentral purchasing bodyLaboratoryAwarded / complete24 Dec 2025—
River Gauging Remote Controlled Travellerscentral purchasing bodyWinchesPlanned25 Sept 2025—
Supply and Delivery of 8 Wave Recording Buoyscentral purchasing bodySurveyingAwarded / complete4 Sept 2025—
Sea Lice Regulatory Framework Environmental Monitoring Servicescentral purchasing bodyEnvironmental monitoring other than for constructionPlanned27 Aug 2025—
Foundational Data for Scotland’s Flood Defence Assets3 lotsEnvironmental engineering consultancy servicesPlanned10 Apr 2025—
Determination of Nutrients in Fresh and Waste Waterscentral purchasing bodyLaboratoryPlanned20 Feb 2025—
Laboratory Information Management System Annual Support & Maintenancecentral purchasing bodyLaboratory servicesAwarded / complete17 Feb 2025—
(25008) Website Compliance Support ServiceAuditing servicesPlanned29 Oct 2024—
Solution ArchitectSupply services of personnel including temporary staffAwarded / complete26 Aug 2024—
Small Survey Vessel & Trailercentral purchasing bodySurvey vesselsPlanned19 Jun 2024—
Award of Provision of Tibco Spotfire Support and Maintenancecentral purchasing bodySoftware support servicesAwarded / complete14 Mar 2024—
Flood Asset ReviewFeasibility studyAwarded / complete18 Oct 2023—
SEPA Environmental Radioactivity Monitoring Programme 2023 - 2029central purchasing bodyEnvironmental monitoring other than for constructionAwarded / complete12 Jun 2023£2,600,000
Maintenance and Repair of High Volume Air Samplerscentral purchasing bodyAir pollution monitoring or measurement servicesAwarded / complete12 Jun 2023£250,000
Next Generation Telemetry Systemcentral purchasing bodyEnvironmental monitoring other than for constructionCancelled23 Dec 2022£1,400,000
Stack Emission MonitoringFrameworkAir pollution monitoring or measurement servicesAwarded / complete3 Nov 2022—
Provision of Agresso System Support Servicescentral purchasing bodyComputer training servicesAwarded / complete15 Aug 2022—

Search all 27 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 12 of 18 published contracts have an end date; 12 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.