Portsmouth Water Limited: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
Companies House: Private Limited Company·South East England·Havant
Official UK PPONPTQG-7125-BLXM
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.
Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.
15 awarded tenders, 21 different suppliers.
Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
What they buyi
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
i
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each
44 Construction structures and materials2 procedures · 14%45 Construction work2 procedures · 14%51 Installation services (except software)2 procedures · 14%72 IT services: consulting, software, internet2 procedures · 14%90 Sewage, refuse, cleaning and environmental2 procedures · 14%09 Petroleum, coal, oil and gas1 procedures · 7%22 Printed matter and related products1 procedures · 7%30 Office and computing machinery1 procedures · 7%How they buyi
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Last 24 months · 14 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract79%(11 notices)
11 of 14 notices are Contract (79%).Framework21%(3 notices)
3 of 14 notices are Framework (21%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Direct award29%(4 notices)
4 of 14 notices are Direct award (29%).Selective29%(4 notices)
4 of 14 notices are Selective (29%).Open21%(3 notices)
3 of 14 notices are Open (21%).Route not published21%(3 notices)
3 of 14 notices are Route not published (21%).
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 2 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.
i
How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from deadline to first award notice, on this buyer’s own tenders.
Based on 3 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on 14 notices across all categories, last 24 months.
i
Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.
Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.
Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tetra Tech | 1 | 6.7% | 1 | 2 | 11 Feb 2026 |
| Cappagh Contractors Construction (London) Ltd | 1 | 6.7% | 1 | 2 | — |
| Brook Green Supply Limited | 1 | 6.7% | 1 | 1 | 18 Mar 2026 |
| WATTSERVE ITCHEN LIMITED | 1 | 6.7% | 1 | 1 | 5 Dec 2025 |
| Middlemarch Environmental Ltd | 1 | 6.7% | 1 | 1 | 11 Feb 2026 |
| South East Water | 1 | 6.7% | 1 | 1 | — |
| Ecological Survey & Assessment Limited | 1 | 6.7% | 1 | 1 | 11 Feb 2026 |
| RSK BIOCENSUS LIMITED | 1 | 6.7% | 1 | 1 | 11 Feb 2026 |
The three most frequent suppliers are named on 20% of 15 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 21 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
i
The middle published award value for this buyer.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Supplier | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH Electricity FY27-FY30 | Brook Green Supply Limited | 18 Mar 2026 | 4 yrs | £19,130,000 ≈ £4.8m/yr |
| GEO SCADA WITS Protocol Migration | SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SYSTEMS UK LIMITED | 23 Oct 2025 | 1.2 yrs | £438,028 ≈ £375k/yr |
| Laboratory Water Testing Services | South East Water | — | — | £385,773 † |
Recent procedures
Latest 26 of 26 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement
| Procedure | Status | Published | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRM & Billing SystemBilling system | Awarded / complete | 17 Jul 2023 | £14,000,000 |
| Havant Thicket Reservoir Project – Main Reservoir Works (MRW+)Civil engineering consultancy services | Awarded / complete | 1 Mar 2023 | £88,400,000 |
| Havant Thicket Reservoir Project – Main Works PipelineAgricultural | Awarded / complete | 2 Sept 2022 | £79,400,000 |
| Service Reservoir Inspection and MaintenanceTank and reservoir cleaning services | Planned | 19 Nov 2021 | £2,000,000 |
| AMP7 Non-Infrastructure Framework ContractBoards for electrical apparatus | Awarded / complete | 21 May 2021 | — |
| Fuel Card ServicesAgency fuel cards | Open | 9 Mar 2021 | £1,800,000 |
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
- Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
- Contract end dates. 0 of 12 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.