University of Warwick: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Royal Charter CompanyDfE school register: Higher education institutionsEducationNationwide (UK)Coventry

Companies HouseRC000678 ↗Websitewarwick.ac.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed.

Notices, last 12 months10-74% vs prior 12 months (38)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot217.6% single-bid · 17 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 17 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share10%of 70 awarded procedures · 68 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

70 awarded tenders, 68 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months1none within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published award value, 24m£6.7mnet · on 15 of 16 single-supplier awards · top 5 = 84%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 48 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract 94% (45 notices)
  • Framework 6% (3 notices)
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open 85% (41 notices)
  • Route not published 13% (6 notices)
  • Selective 2% (1 notices)
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 17 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

2robust · n=1717.6% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 48 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

226 of 48 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 10 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

19.4% below estimaterobust · n=10

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
BRUKER UK LIMITED34.3%2312 May 2025
Hexagon Metrology Ltd22.9%1216 Dec 2024
Engelmann & Buckham Ltd22.9%1216 Dec 2024
PHOTONIC SOLUTIONS LIMITED22.9%0224 Jan 2024
Extravaganza Promotional Merchandise11.4%1118 Dec 2024
Owen Taylor & Sons Ltd11.4%116 Jun 2025
Clas-SiC Wafer Fab Ltd11.4%1116 Dec 2024
Graphic Arts Group11.4%1118 Dec 2024

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 10% of 70 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 68 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards — not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£6.7mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 15 of 16 single-supplier awards; the five largest make 84%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

What one of this buyer’s contracts is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£154k middle valuerobust · n=15Middle half £96k–£263k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Roll to Roll Coater & DryerEmerson & Renwick——£2,049,395 †
Butchered Meat and PoultryMidland Foods——£1,500,000 †
Butchered Meat and PoultryOwen Taylor & Sons Ltd——£1,500,000 †
Widefield microscopeNikon Europe B.V——£320,995 †
3.3KV SiC MOSFET devices fabricationClas-SiC Wafer Fab Ltd——£204,679 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published end dates only · 5 of 71 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 158 procedures on this authority cluster, incl. beneficiary and procuring-entity roles

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Car Park ResurfacingDrainage and surface worksPlanned11 Dec 2024—
Continuous Wave X-Band Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectrometer (inc. low power bridge)LaboratoryAwarded / complete2 Dec 2024—
Scrubber for Li-ion Battery Safety Centre for large format cells.Research and development services and related consultancy servicesOpen6 Nov 2024—
Curriculum Management SystemEducational software packageOpen28 Oct 2024—
IDG Professional Services Framework - IIFramework5 lotsHardware integration consultancy servicesOpen21 Oct 2024£9,400,000
Spectral Fluorescence-activated Cell Sorting InstrumentAnalysis apparatusOpen8 Oct 2024£309,000
Emergency Glazing and Boarding Up Services 2025Glazing workPlanned7 Oct 2024£365,000
Emergency Glazing and Boarding Up ServicesGlazing workPlanned2 Oct 2024£365,000
Full Event Management PartnerAdvertising and marketing servicesOpen27 Aug 2024—
Flow Cytometer for High-dimensional Cell Analysis 2024CytometersOpen9 Aug 2024£190,000

Search all 158 procedures for this authority →

Data coverage & method
  • Source: Find a Tender OCDS releases; mixed PCR 2015 / Procurement Act 2023 history — no legal-regime label is applied.
  • Counts are procedures (one notice family), not lots. Authority cluster = canonical buyer plus beneficiary and procuring-entity roles.
  • Published procedure values exist on a minority of notices; their lifetime sum (£48m, ceilings stripped) is a catalogue fact, not spend, and is not shown as a headline.
  • Awards on procedures published in the last 24 months: 17 award records on 16 procedures (16 to a single canonical supplier, 1 multi-supplier). 15 values come from the contract record when the award carried none.
  • Bid counts, deadline-to-award, amendments and award-vs-estimate come from the nightly buyer analytics row; each figure’s own method and sample is behind its , the long form on Methodology.
  • Contract end dates: 5 of 71 published contracts carry a period end; 1 end within 18 months, 0 within 6.
  • Never shown: contact details, predicted winners, payment behaviour, or “who to invite”.
Identifiers consolidated into this page (38 historical Find a Tender publication identifiers)

Official notices referenced this authority under these publication identifiers. Alias URLs are not separate pages.

GB-CHC-University of WarwickGB-FTS-100949GB-FTS-101139GB-FTS-101391GB-FTS-102327GB-FTS-103088GB-FTS-103361GB-FTS-103435GB-FTS-105363GB-FTS-111033GB-FTS-111670GB-FTS-113986GB-FTS-122057GB-FTS-127748GB-FTS-132576GB-FTS-133978GB-FTS-144640GB-FTS-21190GB-FTS-22039GB-FTS-2443GB-FTS-26500GB-FTS-3508GB-FTS-37410GB-FTS-42846

+14 further identifiers not listed here.

Canonical page id: GB-COH-RC000678