The Education and Training Foundation: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
Other public body·Greater London·London
Official UK PPONPTPV-9936-RPRNWebsiteetfoundation.co.uk ↗
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.
Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.
16 awarded tenders, 45 different suppliers.
Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
What they buyi
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
i
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each
73 Research and development services1 procedures · 20%79 Business services: law, marketing, consulting1 procedures · 20%80 Education and training services1 procedures · 20%How they buyi
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Last 24 months · 5 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract100%(5 notices)
5 of 5 notices are Contract (100%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Limited / restricted40%(2 notices)
2 of 5 notices are Limited / restricted (40%).Direct award20%(1 notices)
1 of 5 notices are Direct award (20%).Open20%(1 notices)
1 of 5 notices are Open (20%).Route not published20%(1 notices)
1 of 5 notices are Route not published (20%).
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 1 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on 5 notices across all categories, last 24 months.
i
Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.
Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.
Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BlueLight CRM Ltd | 1 | 6.3% | 1 | 1 | 9 Jul 2025 |
| City of Sunderland College | 1 | 6.3% | 1 | 1 | 6 Aug 2025 |
| INTRINSIC AI LTD | 1 | 6.3% | 1 | 1 | 5 Jan 2026 |
| EdInvent Inc. | 1 | 6.3% | 1 | 1 | 20 Mar 2026 |
| Natspec | 1 | 6.3% | 0 | 8 | — |
| CITY COLLEGE NORWICH | 1 | 6.3% | 0 | 7 | — |
| Weston College | 1 | 6.3% | 0 | 6 | — |
| AMBITIOUS ABOUT AUTISM | 1 | 6.3% | 0 | 4 | — |
The three most frequent suppliers are named on 19% of 16 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 45 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
i
The middle published award value for this buyer.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Supplier | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic Digital Partner | BlueLight CRM Ltd | 9 Jul 2025 | 3 yrs · up to 5 yrs | £582,653 ≈ £194k/yr |
| AI-enabled Professional Standards Assessment and Training Needs Analysis | INTRINSIC AI LTD | 5 Jan 2026 | 6 mo | £170,400 |
| Centre for Excellence in Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) 2025 | City of Sunderland College | 6 Aug 2025 | 7 mo · up to 1.6 yrs | £137,952 |
| Digital Credentialing | EdInvent Inc. | 20 Mar 2026 | 1.9 yrs | £108,000 ≈ £56k/yr |
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
Published end dates only · 17 of 22 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast
Soonest 10 of 12 contracts ending within 18 months.
Recent procedures
Latest 22 of 22 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement
| Procedure | Status | Published | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Digital Credentialing Platform | Awarded / complete | 11 May 2026 | — |
| AI-enabled Professional Standards Assessment and Training Needs Analysis (Individuals and Organisations) | Awarded / complete | 24 Feb 2026 | — |
| Market engagement request for an evaluation of the Education Training Foundation (2013-2026)Evaluation consultancy services | Planning | 28 Nov 2025 | £0 |
| Award of Centre for Excellence in Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) 2025Education and training services | Awarded / complete | 7 Aug 2025 | £138,848 |
| Strategic Digital Partner | Awarded / complete | 10 Jul 2025 | — |
| Managed IT and Cyber Security ServicesComputer audit consultancy and hardware consultancy services | Awarded / complete | 19 Jun 2024 | £316,667 |
| Strategic Digital Partner (Content Management System)Content management software development services | Unsuccessful | 21 Mar 2024 | £250,000 |
| Finance SystemAccounting software package | Awarded / complete | 23 Nov 2023 | £200,000 |
| Research, Impact and Learning FrameworkEvaluation consultancy services | Awarded / complete | 16 Aug 2023 | £1 |
| Data EnvironmentData services | Awarded / complete | 5 Apr 2023 | £248,000 |
| Framework for Excellence in Special Educational Needs and DisabilitiesEducation and training services | Awarded / complete | 24 Mar 2023 | £1 |
| Strategic Learning Partner (via Learning Management System implementation)Design consultancy services | Awarded / complete | 23 Jan 2023 | £1,250,000 |
| Graphic Design FrameworkGraphic design services | Awarded / complete | 21 Dec 2022 | £288,000 |
| Framework agreement Essential Digital SkillsEducation and training services | Planned | 17 Aug 2022 | £1,200,000 |
| Framework Mentoring (support for college mentors)Education and training services | Planned | 17 Aug 2022 | £12,000,000 |
| Framework Leadership and GovernanceEducation and training services | Planned | 17 Aug 2022 | £13,500,000 |
| Plan and Deliver two FE Sector Leadership Programmes- FE Strategic Leadership & Preparing for CEO ProgrammesEducation and training services | Awarded / complete | 7 Jan 2022 | £1,184,000 |
| OTLA phase 8 – action research for English, ESOL and Essential Digital Skills teachers in the Further Education and Training sectorEducation and training services | Awarded / complete | 23 Nov 2021 | £1,485,000 |
| T Level Professional Development (TLPD) Leadership ResidentialEducation and training services | Awarded / complete | 16 Nov 2021 | £800,000 |
| T Level Professional Development (TLPD) Leadership ResidentialEducation and training services | Planned | 8 Jun 2021 | £850,000 |
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
- Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
- Contract end dates. 17 of 22 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.