Simply Serve Ltd: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Private Limited CompanySouth West EnglandYeovil

Official UK PPONPZLV-9789-JMMWWebsitesimplyserveltd.co.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months4-69% vs prior 12 months (13)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot90% single-bid · 3 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share43%of 14 awarded procedures · 19 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

14 awarded tenders, 19 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months11 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£3.8mnet · on 13 of 13 published values · top 5 = 72%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 17 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract94%(16 notices)
    16 of 17 notices are Contract (94%).
  • Framework6%(1 notices)
    1 of 17 notices are Framework (6%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award29%(5 notices)
    5 of 17 notices are Direct award (29%).
  • Open29%(5 notices)
    5 of 17 notices are Open (29%).
  • Route not published29%(5 notices)
    5 of 17 notices are Route not published (29%).
  • Limited / restricted12%(2 notices)
    2 of 17 notices are Limited / restricted (12%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

9moderate · n=30% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from deadline to first award notice, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 4 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

68 daysmoderate · n=4
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 17 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

04 of 17 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
CGW CONTRACTORS (SW) LTD.framework/DPS on 1214.3%2323 Mar 2026
MSC Yeovil Ltd214.3%22—
OCS Group UK Limited214.3%222 Jun 2026
Tradebe Healthcare National Limited214.3%142 Feb 2026
Boden Group Facilities Ltdframework/DPS on 117.1%1323 Mar 2026
DSSL Group17.1%1218 Mar 2026
Onyx Fire & Security Ltd17.1%1214 Jan 2026
D R Jones Yeovil Ltdframework/DPS on 117.1%1223 Mar 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 43% of 14 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 19 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£3.8mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 13 of 13 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 72%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£241k middle valuerobust · n=13Middle half £90k–£400k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Lot 1 - Yeovil District Hospital and Musgrove Park Hospital (Bin exchange)Tradebe Healthcare National Limited2 Feb 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£966,759
≈ £322k/yr
Lot 1 1 - Yeovil District Hospital and Musgrove Park Hospital (Offensive waste)Tradebe Healthcare National Limited2 Feb 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£533,577
≈ £178k/yr
Lot 22 - Somerset NHS Foundation Trust Community & Mental Health Sites (Bulk Collection);SRCL Limited t/a Stericycle2 Feb 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£470,424
≈ £157k/yr
Minimally Invasive Surgery Energy & StaplingJOHNSON & JOHNSON MEDICAL LTD30 Jun 20264 yrs£400,000
≈ £100k/yr
Provision of Security Guarding Services at Yeovil District Hospital.OCS Group UK Limited2 Jun 20263 mo · up to 0.8 yrs£338,202

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published end dates only · 15 of 22 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 20 of 20 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Provision of Pest Control ServicesPest-control servicesPlanning8 Oct 2026£193,391
Provision of Security Guarding Services at Yeovil District Hospital.Awarded / complete25 Sept 2026—
Minimally Invasive Surgery - Energy Devices & StaplingAwarded / complete16 Jul 2026—
Framework Agreement for the provision of planned and reactive worksFramework3 lotsDrainage worksAwarded / complete21 May 2026£10,000,000
Install of access control equipment along with servicing of automatic doorsAccess control systemAwarded / complete1 Apr 2026£540,000
Provision of Human Healthcare Waste collection, Transportation and Disposal services.2 lotsClinical-waste disposal servicesAwarded / complete23 Mar 2026£1,500,000
Provision of Passive Fire Protection SurveysFire and explosion protection and control consultancy servicesAwarded / complete4 Mar 2026£0
Provision of Security Guarding ServicesGuard servicesPlanning13 Oct 2025£1,500,000
Provision of Security Guarding ServicesGuard servicesPlanning13 Oct 2025£1,500,000
Provision of Passive Fire Protection SurveysFire and explosion protection and control consultancy servicesOpen3 Oct 2025£0
Replace onsite garage doors and clad face of garagesAwarded / complete26 Sept 2025—
Rental of car parking spacesAwarded / complete26 Sept 2025—
Rental of car parking spaces (90 x spaces @ Quedam)Awarded / complete26 Sept 2025—
Procedure packsMedical consumablesAwarded / complete13 Aug 2025—
Provision of Human Healthcare Waste DisposalClinical-waste disposal servicesPlanning8 Aug 2025£1,500,000
Provision of Human Healthcare Waste DisposalClinical-waste disposal servicesPlanning7 Aug 2025£1,500,000
Provision of Security Guarding ServicesAwarded / complete19 Jun 2025—
Hot Beverage and Vending SolutionsHotelAwarded / complete23 Mar 2021—
Provision of Human Healthcare Waste Collection, Transportation and Disposal Services5 lotsClinical-waste collection servicesAwarded / complete22 Mar 2021—
Invitation for the provision of a Security Guarding ServiceSecurity servicesAwarded / complete8 Feb 2021—

Search all 20 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 15 of 22 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.