Supporting and auxiliary transport services; travel agencies services: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition

CPV 63000000Services · division10 classes with notices

Open now25open for bids now · see them in the search
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months451237 contracting authorities · 1,328 in the catalogue
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot316% single-bid · 96 procedures, 36 months
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 110 lots from 96 competitions run by 83 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 60 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 3) and 50 from older notices (bids received, middle 4).

Last 36 months.

Typical contract value£107,100middle value of 451 contract awards, net · not frameworks
i

What a contract here is usually worth.

Middle value of published award values, VAT excluded. Framework ceilings are left out because they are not real contract values.

Based on 451 awards with a usable value, last 36 months.

Published values, not actual spend.

Last 36 months.

Deadline to award44 daysmiddle value · 58 awarded procedures
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Based on 58 decided competitions, last 36 months.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Newest open tenders

3 of 25 open for bids now · newest first

See all 25 open tenders →

Sub-sectors of supporting and auxiliary transport…

10 CPV classes with notices · sorted by notices in the last 12 months · 1,280 of 1,328 notices in this division carry a class-level code

Who buys
i

Which buyers publish the most notices here.

Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.

All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name

Buyer type
i

What kinds of public bodies buy here.

Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.

  • Local authorities35%(451 notices)
    451 of 1,296 notices are Local authorities (35%).
  • Central government33%(424 notices)
    424 of 1,296 notices are Central government (33%).
  • Other public bodies14%(179 notices)
    179 of 1,296 notices are Other public bodies (14%).
  • Education & universities6%(79 notices)
    79 of 1,296 notices are Education & universities (6%).
  • Police, fire & emergency2%(26 notices)
    26 of 1,296 notices are Police, fire & emergency (2%).
  • Not classified11%(137 notices)
    137 of 1,296 notices are Not classified (11%).
Contracting authorityTypeNoticesLast 12 monthsOpen now
Department of Health & Social CareCentral government4900
UK Research and InnovationCentral government38180
Ministry of DefenceCentral government3650
TRINITY HOUSECentral government36280
Transport for LondonOther public bodies2960
British CouncilLocal authorities20100
Home OfficeCentral government1760
Cefasnot classified1560
National Highways LimitedCentral government14100
Tees Valley Combined AuthorityLocal authorities1490

506 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.

Where the work is delivered
i

Where the work on these notices is delivered.

Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.

Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.

Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 748 of 1,328 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region

RegionNoticesBids / lotSME winsLocal wins
Greater London154 · 21%362%48%
South East England114 · 15%334%30%
East of England110 · 15%621%24%
Scotland106 · 14%646%75%
Yorkshire and the Humber101 · 14%632%16%
North West England97 · 13%528%24%
North East England96 · 13%438%19%
South West England96 · 13%438%24%
West Midlands88 · 12%327%16%
East Midlands77 · 10%429%14%
Wales (Cymru)43 · 6%———
Northern Ireland37 · 5%———

Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.

How it is bought
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract87%(1,149 notices)
    1,149 of 1,328 notices are Contract (87%).
  • Framework13%(177 notices)
    177 of 1,328 notices are Framework (13%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system0%(2 notices)
    2 of 1,328 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (0%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open36%(473 notices)
    473 of 1,328 notices are Open (36%).
  • Route not published21%(279 notices)
    279 of 1,328 notices are Route not published (21%).
  • Limited / restricted20%(264 notices)
    264 of 1,328 notices are Limited / restricted (20%).
  • Direct award15%(194 notices)
    194 of 1,328 notices are Direct award (15%).
  • Selective9%(118 notices)
    118 of 1,328 notices are Selective (9%).
Threshold
i

How much of this market is above the legal threshold.

Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.

  • Above threshold77%(199 notices)
    199 of 259 notices are Above threshold (77%).
  • Below threshold23%(60 notices)
    60 of 259 notices are Below threshold (23%).
Typical tender window
i

How long bidders get to respond.

Middle value in days from the tender notice to its deadline.

All notices we hold, not just recent ones.

31 daysrobust · n=204middle value, notice to deadline

Competition

Contracts published in the last 36 months (665) · bid counts per lot from award notices · values are net contract awards, framework and DPS ceilings excluded · SME and local status as declared

Bids per lot · n=110
i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

  • 1 bid16%(18)
    18 of 110 lots fall in 1 bid (16%).
  • 2–340%(44)
    44 of 110 lots fall in 2–3 (40%).
  • 4–625%(28)
    28 of 110 lots fall in 4–6 (25%).
  • 7 or more18%(20)
    20 of 110 lots fall in 7 or more (18%).
Contract value, net
i

The usual range of contract values here.

The middle half of published award values, VAT excluded, with the middle value marked. Framework ceilings are left out.

Published values, not actual spend.

p25 £38,335middle value £107,100p75 £638,821
interquartile range of 451 awards · p90 £4,000,000
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 110 lots from 96 competitions run by 83 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 60 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 3) and 50 from older notices (bids received, middle 4).

Last 36 months.

3robust · n=96middle half 2–5
Competed
i

How much of this market is actually put out to competition.

Notices run as an open or selective procedure, out of all notices that say which procedure was used. Direct awards count as not competed.

231 of 598 notices that state a procedure, last 36 months. 67 more give no procedure and are left out.

Last 36 months.

39%robust · n=598
Bids from SMEs
i

What share of bids come from small and medium firms.

SME bids divided by all bids, on lots where the buyer published the split.

237 SME bids out of 365, on 93 lots where the buyer published the split.

Last 36 months.

65%robust · n=365
Awards won by SMEs
i

What share of contracts go to small and medium firms.

Awards to a single supplier that declared its size. SME divided by all.

138 of 327 awards where the winner declared its size.

Last 36 months.

42%robust · n=327
Won locally
i

How much work here goes to companies based in the region.

Contract awards where the winner’s registered address is in this region, out of awards where the address is known.

Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.

Last 36 months.

50%robust · n=255winner registered in the delivery region
Winning award vs estimate
i

Do winners come in above or below the buyer’s estimate.

For each lot we compare the published estimate with the award, like for like. Below means the winner was paid less than estimated, above means more.

Based on 61 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 36 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 36 months.

at the estimaterobust · n=6120 below · 11 above
Abandoned
i

How often a tender ends with no award.

Notices cancelled, withdrawn or marked unsuccessful, plus terminated ones that never got an award.

8 of 665 notices, last 36 months.

Only what buyers published. Tenders that quietly went nowhere are not counted.

Last 36 months.

1%robust · n=665
Frameworks & DPS: bidders per lot
i

How many companies apply to get onto a framework or DPS here.

Middle value per lot, frameworks and dynamic markets only. Getting onto a panel is not the same as winning work, so it is kept separate.

Based on 53 lots from 34 framework and DPS notices, last 36 months.

Last 36 months.

7robust · n=3467 vehicle procedures · admission to a panel, not a contest

Who wins
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 945 awards to 560 suppliers · the five most frequent winners hold 10% of contract awards in the last 36 months

Where to submit
i

Where bids for this work are submitted.

Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.

E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 382 of 1,328 notices name one · each portal page explains registration

Proactis / ProContract63 notices · 16%
JAGGAER / BravoSolution53 notices · 14% · 2 open
Public Contracts Scotland (PCS)50 notices · 13% · 2 open
EU-Supply Complete Tender Management36 notices · 9% · 1 open
Delta eSourcing32 notices · 8%
Atamis Health Family Portal26 notices · 7% · 1 open
Sell2Wales22 notices · 6%

Open tenders in supporting and auxiliary transport…

25 open for bids now · soonest deadline first

All 25 open notices with CPV 63… →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 63, on the tender or any of its lots. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2021 to 2 Nov 2026.
  • Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
  • Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.