Greenshaw Learning Trust: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: PRI/LBG/NSC (Private, Limited by guarantee, no share capital, use of 'Limited' exemption)Greater London Sutton

Official UK PPONPJZJ-2917-YNXXWebsitegreenshawlearningtrust.co.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months3+200% vs prior 12 months (1)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot60% single-bid · 5 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Published award value, 24m£3.4mnet · on 4 of 4 published values · top 5 = 100%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 4 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(4 notices)
    4 of 4 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open75%(3 notices)
    3 of 4 notices are Open (75%).
  • Selective25%(1 notices)
    1 of 4 notices are Selective (25%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

6robust · n=50% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from deadline to first award notice, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 3 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

11 daysmoderate · n=3
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 4 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

13 of 4 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 2 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

32.1% below estimateindicative · n=2

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
SUEZ Recycling and Recovery UK Ltd222.2%2231 Jul 2026
Lyreco UK Limitedframework/DPS on 1222.2%1413 Jul 2026
SmartestEnergy Limited222.2%1228 Oct 2025
CORONA ENERGY LIMITED222.2%1228 Oct 2025
Oxford Direct Services Trading Limited111.1%1129 Jan 2026
RM Resources t/a Consortiumframework/DPS on 1111.1%04—
ESPO (Eastern Shires Purchasing Organisation)framework/DPS on 1111.1%03—
Findel Education Ltdframework/DPS on 1111.1%03—

9 awarded procedures across 17 suppliers: too few to describe concentration.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£3.4mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 4 of 4 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 100%; a further 2 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£575k middle valuemoderate · n=4Middle half £349k–£1.1m.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Greenshaw Learning Trust Flexible Gas & Electricity Oct 2620250725-000004 (2025/S 000-043219).SmartestEnergy Limited28 Oct 20253 yrs · up to 4 yrs£2,100,000
≈ £700k/yr
Greenshaw Learning Trust Flexible Gas & Electricity Oct 2620250725-000004 (2025/S 000-043219).CORONA ENERGY LIMITED28 Oct 20253 yrs · up to 4 yrs£750,000
≈ £250k/yr
Office and Education Supplies Greenshaw Learning TrustLyreco UK Limited13 Jul 20262.1 yrs · up to 4.1 yrs£400,000
≈ £192k/yr
Waste Management - Gloucestershire SchoolSUEZ Recycling and Recovery UK Ltd31 Jul 20263 yrs · up to 7 yrs£197,274
≈ £66k/yr

Recent procedures

Latest 12 of 12 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Office and Education Supplies Greenshaw Learning TrustAwarded / complete3 Aug 2026—
Waste Management - Gloucestershire SchoolRefuse and waste related servicesAwarded / complete31 Jul 2026£0
GLT Waste Management - Berkshire & London2 lotsRefuse and waste related servicesAwarded / complete28 Jul 2026£1,130,000
Greenshaw Learning Trust Flexible Gas & Electricity Oct 262 lotsElectricityAwarded / complete30 Oct 2025£8,400,000
GLT Multi Site Cleaning Service2 lotsAccommodation cleaning servicesAwarded / complete28 Jan 2025—
GLT CopiersPhotocopier maintenance servicesAwarded / complete28 Jan 2025£1,900,000
GLT Finance Management SystemFinancial systems software packageAwarded / complete6 Jun 2024£420,000
GLT Data Protection ServicesBusiness and management consultancy servicesOpen15 May 2024£150,000
GLT Pupil Management Information SystemEducational software packageOpen15 Sept 2022£13,500,000
Greenshaw Learning Trust - Gas & Electric Supply 20222 lotsElectricityAwarded / complete5 Sept 2022£6,000,000
The Supply of Educational Supplies to Greenshaw Learning TrustFramework6 lotsArt and craft paperAwarded / complete1 Jun 2022£8,000,000
Greenshaw Learning Trust - Water and Waste Water TenderWater mainsOpen9 May 2022—

Search all 12 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 2 of 27 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.