UNIVERSITY OF LINCOLN: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

Large organisationLincolnEast MidlandsMain market: Adult and other education services

Official UK PPONPGYJ-5468-QTPJ

Procedures with an award2527 award records
i

How many tenders this supplier has won.

Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.

Public authorities16named on published awards
i

How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.

Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.

Attributable award value£2.1mnet · on 17 of 27 award records · single-supplier, no ceilings
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

Last 12 months13awards · 6 in the prior 24 months · last 12 Oct 2026
i

Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.

Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.

Contracts ending ≤18 months8end date published on 27 of 27 awards
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Buyer regions5most often Yorkshire and the Humber
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

Where they win
i

In which categories this supplier wins.

Its awards by the category (CPV) of the lot won. An award to the whole procedure, with no lot named, counts once under the procedure’s main category.

27 awards (26 for a named lot, 96%, 1 for a whole procedure with no lot named; pending awards included) · top CPV classes, shares of all 27

Attributable award value
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

£2.1mOn 17 of 27 award records; the five largest make 81%. Largest rows below.
Typical attributable award
i

What one of this supplier’s wins is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

£35k middle valuerobust · n=17
Award vs estimate
i

Does this supplier usually win above or below the buyer’s estimate.

Its own wins, estimate against award per lot, in its sector.

Based on 2 wins in its industry (CPV division 80). Small sample.

A past pattern, not a margin and not a price to bid.

36.1% below estimateindicative · n=2compared within CPV division 80
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

AuthorityAwardedTermPublished value
Professional Nurse Advocates Training 2025/26NHS England14 Aug 20251 yrs · up to 3 yrs£949,620
≈ £950k/yr
Transmission of AMR bacteria during the processing of chicken meatThe Food Standards Agency——£310,705 †
CALL-OFF: Adult Skills and Employment Programmes Lot 3Lincolnshire County Council—1 yrs£172,500 †
≈ £173k/yr
Advanced Practice Supported Portfolio RouteHealth Education England——£122,450 †
Effectiveness of interventions taken by UK slaughterhouses and cutting plants in response to unsatisfactory process hygiene criteria (PHC) resultsThe Food Standards Agency—1.6 yrs · up to 2.1 yrs£121,637 †
≈ £77k/yr

Where their buyers are
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 25 of 25 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

Yorkshire and the Humber10 procedures · 40%
Greater London6 procedures · 24%
East Midlands5 procedures · 20%
West Midlands3 procedures · 12%
East of England1 procedures · 4%

Bidding record
i

Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.

Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.

Procurement Act 2023 award notices name every bidder · 2 notices name this supplier, covering 4 lots since 14 Apr 2026 · observed bids, not an estimate

Contract lots contested
i

Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.

Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.

0 won · 1 lostindicative · n=1Fewer than three decided lots: no rate is claimed.
Framework / DPS places
i

Frameworks and DPS this supplier got onto.

Lots appointed out of lots applied for. Kept apart from contract wins because almost every compliant bidder gets a place.

3 of 3Lots on 1 notice: a place is won per lot.
Authorities bid for
i

How many public bodies this supplier has bid to.

Buyers on notices that name it as a bidder, win or lose.

2Bid for and never won with 1 of them on contract lots.
NoticeAuthorityOutcomeBiddersPublished
Provision of Level 6 Chartered Management Degree ApprenticeshipMinistry of Defencelost517 Jun 2026
Adult Skills and Employment Programmesframework/DPSLincolnshire County Councilappointedall 3 lots bid for6514 Apr 2026

Bidder names come from Procurement Act 2023 award notices, which list every bidder (from 2025). Older notices name no bidders, so earlier contests do not appear here. Latest ten notices shown.

Who they sell to
i

Which public bodies award work to this supplier.

Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i

What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.

Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.

  • Central government44%(12 awards)
    12 of 27 awards are Central government (44%).
  • Local authority33%(9 awards)
    9 of 27 awards are Local authority (33%).
  • Type not classified15%(4 awards)
    4 of 27 awards are Type not classified (15%).
  • NHS & health7%(2 awards)
    2 of 27 awards are NHS & health (7%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
NHS England416%414 Aug 2025
Lincolnshire County Councilframework/DPS on 128%431 Jul 2026
The Food Standards Agency28%21 Sept 2026
Health Education England28%213 Oct 2022
NORTH EAST LINCOLNSHIRE COUNCILframework/DPS on 128%21 Sept 2025
Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust28%230 Nov 2025
NATURAL ENGLAND (Defra Network eTendering Portal)28%212 Oct 2026
THE NATIONAL FOREST COMPANY14%116 Dec 2025

Share = of the 25 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published end dates only · 27 of 27 awards carry one · not a retender forecast

Recent awards

Latest 27 of 27 award records naming this supplier

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
CPD Courses 26/27 Uni of LincolnMid and South Essex NHS Foundation TrustNot published£25,000 †
from the contract notice
DBTH Health Innovation Expedition CourseDoncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNot published£50,000 †
from the contract notice
Basis Soil & Water CertificateNATURAL ENGLAND (Defra Network eTendering Portal)Not published£16,440 †
from the contract notice
Community Archaeology Test-Pit Excavations in Charnwood ForestTHE NATIONAL FOREST COMPANYNot published£50,540 †
from the contract notice
Best Interest AssessorThe North Yorkshire CouncilNot published£34,800 †
from the contract notice
Health Innovation Expedition CourseDoncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNot published£25,000 †
from the contract notice
Infrastructure and Trade Feasibility (Cold Storage)NORTH EAST LINCOLNSHIRE COUNCILNot published£99,315 †
from the contract notice
Return to Midwifery programmeNHS EnglandNot published£10,500 †
from the contract notice
Social Work Degree ApprenticeshipNORTH EAST LINCOLNSHIRE COUNCILNot published£46,000 †
dynamic market estimate · not attributable revenue
Doctorate in Clinical Psychology - Health Education England (MIDS)NHS EnglandNot publishedNot published
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 27 of 27 awards; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.