THE NATIONAL FOREST COMPANY: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: PRI/LTD BY GUAR/NSC (Private, limited by guarantee, no share capital)GOV.UK register: OtherCentral governmentEast MidlandsSwadlincote

Companies House02991970 ↗Websitenationalforest.org ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed.

Notices, last 12 months8+700% vs prior 12 months (1)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Contracts ending ≤18 months43 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published award value, 24m£623knet · on 9 of 9 single-supplier awards · top 5 = 79%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 9 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract 100% (9 notices)
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted 89% (8 notices)
  • Open 11% (1 notices)
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 9 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

01 of 9 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0.1% below estimateindicative · n=1

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
C.J. Springthorpe LTD333.3%339 Feb 2026
JMU Services Limited111.1%1114 Jul 2026
SMALL WORLD CONSULTING LIMITED111.1%1130 Jun 2025
Leicestershire Victoria County History Trust111.1%1118 Dec 2025
Heligan Gardens Limited111.1%1114 Jan 2026
Lindley Productions Limited111.1%1119 Feb 2026
UNIVERSITY OF LINCOLN111.1%1118 Dec 2025

9 awarded procedures across 7 suppliers — too few to describe concentration.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£623kSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 9 of 9 single-supplier awards; the five largest make 79%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

What one of this buyer’s contracts is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£47k middle valuerobust · n=9Middle half £30k–£65k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Estate MaintenanceC.J. Springthorpe LTD—2 yrs£175,000 †
≈ £88k/yr
Open grounding mowingC.J. Springthorpe LTD—3 yrs£153,549 †
≈ £51k/yr
Feasibility for a Forest Enterprise HubHeligan Gardens Limited—3 mo£64,960 †
Community Archaeology Test-Pit Excavations in Charnwood ForestUNIVERSITY OF LINCOLN—1.1 yrs£50,540 †
≈ £47k/yr
'GEOPARK IN THE DARK'Lindley Productions Limited—2 mo£46,660 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published end dates only · 9 of 9 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 9 of 9 procedures on this authority cluster, incl. beneficiary and procuring-entity roles

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Tree Planting Evaluation and ECF PortalAwarded / complete14 Jul 2026—
'GEOPARK IN THE DARK'Awarded / complete19 Feb 2026—
Hedge cuttingAwarded / complete9 Feb 2026—
Open grounding mowingAwarded / complete9 Feb 2026—
Estate MaintenanceAwarded / complete9 Feb 2026—
Feasibility for a Forest Enterprise HubBusiness development consultancy servicesAwarded / complete14 Jan 2026£65,000
Community Archaeology Test-Pit Excavations in Charnwood ForestAwarded / complete18 Dec 2025—
Charnwood Forest Geopark Historical Research ProjectAwarded / complete18 Dec 2025—
Landscape assessment to inform the National Forest Company forest creation strategyAwarded / complete30 Jun 2025—

Search all 9 procedures for this authority →

Data coverage & method
  • Source: Find a Tender OCDS releases; mixed PCR 2015 / Procurement Act 2023 history — no legal-regime label is applied.
  • Counts are procedures (one notice family), not lots. Authority cluster = canonical buyer plus beneficiary and procuring-entity roles.
  • Published procedure values exist on a minority of notices; their lifetime sum (£65k, ceilings stripped) is a catalogue fact, not spend, and is not shown as a headline.
  • Awards on procedures published in the last 24 months: 9 award records on 9 procedures (9 to a single canonical supplier, 0 multi-supplier). 9 values come from the contract record when the award carried none.
  • Bid counts, deadline-to-award, amendments and award-vs-estimate come from the nightly buyer analytics row; each figure’s own method and sample is behind its , the long form on Methodology.
  • Contract end dates: 9 of 9 published contracts carry a period end; 4 end within 18 months, 3 within 6.
  • Never shown: contact details, predicted winners, payment behaviour, or “who to invite”.