Kind & Co (Builders) Ltd: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

SMECompanies House: Private Limited CompanyMain market: Building construction work

Companies House00387371 ↗

Procedures with an award1526 award records
i

How many tenders this supplier has won.

Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.

Public authorities14named on published awards
i

How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.

Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.

Attributable award value£62mnet · on 4 of 26 award records · single-supplier, no ceilings
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

Last 12 months4awards · 5 in the prior 24 months · last 14 Aug 2026
i

Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.

Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.

Contracts ending ≤18 months14end date on 18 of 26 awards · 13 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Buyer regions6most often Greater London
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

Where they win
i

In which categories this supplier wins.

Its awards by the category (CPV) of the lot won. An award to the whole procedure, with no lot named, counts once under the procedure’s main category.

26 awards (24 for a named lot, 92%, 2 for a whole procedure with no lot named; pending awards included) · top CPV classes, shares of all 26

Attributable award value
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

£62mOn 4 of 26 award records; the five largest make 100%. Largest rows below.
Typical attributable award
i

What one of this supplier’s wins is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

£15m middle valuemoderate · n=4
Award vs estimate
i

Does this supplier usually win above or below the buyer’s estimate.

Its own wins, estimate against award per lot, in its sector.

Based on 1 wins in its industry (CPV division 45). Small sample.

A past pattern, not a margin and not a price to bid.

16.4% above estimateindicative · n=1compared within CPV division 45
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

AuthorityAwardedTermPublished value
Construction Works at Farnborough and Bessborough Sites, SW15 (Passivhaus)London Borough of Wandsworth——£23,897,484 †
PL0042 Essex County Hospital Construction ContractorEssex County Council——£18,624,195 †
Croydon New Build Social Housing Sites: Whytecliffe RoadLondon Construction Programme on behalf on Moat Homes——£10,546,179 †
LOT 2 MORRIS BLITZ COURTLondon Borough of Hackney14 Aug 20262 yrs£9,216,658
≈ £4.6m/yr

Where their buyers are
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 15 of 15 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

Greater London8 procedures · 53%
North West England2 procedures · 13%
East of England2 procedures · 13%
Yorkshire and the Humber1 procedures · 7%
South East England1 procedures · 7%
Wales (Cymru)1 procedures · 7%

Bidding record
i

Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.

Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.

Procurement Act 2023 award notices name every bidder · 5 notices name this supplier, covering 6 lots since 16 Jul 2026 · observed bids, not an estimate

Win rate on contract lots
i

How often this supplier wins when it bids.

Won divided by won plus lost, counted per LOT on Procurement Act 2023 notices naming every bidder. Framework places are counted separately.

Real bids, but only where the buyer named the bidders.

20%robust · n=5Won 1, lost 4 of the contract lots with a published award; 1 still undecided. A lot is one contest, so bidding for several lots of one notice counts once for each.
Authorities bid for
i

How many public bodies this supplier has bid to.

Buyers on notices that name it as a bidder, win or lose.

5Bid for and never won with 3 of them on contract lots.

Bidder names come from Procurement Act 2023 award notices, which list every bidder (from 2025). Older notices name no bidders, so earlier contests do not appear here. Latest ten notices shown.

Who they sell to
i

Which public bodies award work to this supplier.

Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i

What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.

Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.

  • Type not classified73%(19 awards)
    19 of 26 awards are Type not classified (73%).
  • Local authority23%(6 awards)
    6 of 26 awards are Local authority (23%).
  • NHS & health4%(1 awards)
    1 of 26 awards are NHS & health (4%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
London Borough of Haringeyframework/DPS on 2213.3%224 Dec 2025
LHC Procurement Group Limited for the Welsh Procurement Alliance (WPA)framework/DPS on 116.7%721 Apr 2023
The Hyde Groupframework/DPS on 116.7%315 Sept 2025
Fusion21 Members Consortiumframework/DPS on 116.7%316 May 2023
South East Consortiumframework/DPS on 116.7%21 Apr 2021
London Borough of Wandsworth16.7%118 Feb 2026
Essex County Council16.7%119 Jul 2023
London Construction Programme on behalf on Moat Homes16.7%120 Apr 2026

Share = of the 15 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

18 of 26 awards carry an end date, 17 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 14.

Recent awards

Latest 26 of 26 award records naming this supplier

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
LOT 2 MORRIS BLITZ COURTLondon Borough of Hackney14 Aug 2026£9,216,658
Construction Works at Farnborough and Bessborough Sites, SW15 (Passivhaus)London Borough of WandsworthNot published£23,897,484 †
from the contract notice
London Construction Programme General Works Framework MW25-GWLondon Borough of HaringeyNot published£3,000,000,000 †
framework ceiling · not attributable revenue
Croydon New Build Social Housing Sites: Whytecliffe RoadLondon Construction Programme on behalf on Moat HomesNot published£10,546,179 †
from the contract notice
17 NEW BUILD HOMES AND SUPPORTED ACCOMMODATION AT NORMAN GROVETower HamletsNot published£6,443,930 †
dynamic market estimate · not attributable revenue
Main Contractor Framework - East under £20 MillionThe Hyde GroupNot published£3,000,000,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 10 appointed suppliers
Main Contractor Framework - London under £20 MillionThe Hyde GroupNot published£3,000,000,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 10 appointed suppliers
Main Contractor Framework - South under £20 Million (continuation)The Hyde GroupNot published£3,000,000,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 4 appointed suppliers
London Construction Programme Major Works Housing Framework MW24-HLondon Borough of HaringeyNot published£3,000,000,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 48 appointed suppliers
Lot 2 – £1,000,000 - £5,000,000Hull City CouncilNot published£1,560,000,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 41 appointed suppliers
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 1 of 26 awards, estimated from the published duration on 17 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.