Monitoring and control services: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition

CPV 71700000Services · classin Architecture & Engineering

Open now7deadline in the future or not published
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed.

Notices, last 12 months6454 contracting authorities · 275 in the catalogue
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot325% single-bid · 27 procedures, 36 months
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 44 lots from 27 competitions, last 36 months. 8 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 3.5) and 36 from older notices (bids received, middle 3).

Last 36 months.

Typical contract value£470,172median of 62 contract awards, net · not frameworks
i

What a contract here is usually worth.

Middle value of published award values, VAT excluded. Framework ceilings are left out because they are not real contract values.

Based on 62 awards with a usable value, last 36 months.

Published values, not actual spend.

Last 36 months.

Deadline to award61 daysmedian · 11 awarded procedures
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Based on 11 decided competitions, last 36 months.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Codes and neighbouring classes

The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division

Who buys
i

Which buyers publish the most notices here.

Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.

All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name

Buyer type
i

What kinds of public bodies buy here.

Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.

  • Other public bodies 39% (103 notices)
  • Local authorities 22% (60 notices)
  • Central government 18% (48 notices)
  • Education & universities 2% (6 notices)
  • NHS & health 2% (6 notices)
  • Not classified 16% (44 notices)
Contracting authorityTypeNoticesLast 12 monthsOpen now
Scape Group Limited (trading as SCAPE)Other public bodies1700
United Utilities Water LimitedOther public bodies1341
Karbon HomesOther public bodies1310
NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITEDCentral government1020
Scape Procure Scotland Ltdnot classified1020
Scape Procure Limited (trading as SCAPE)Other public bodies920
Scottish Governmentnot classified611
ENVIRONMENT AGENCY (Defra Network eTendering Portal)Other public bodies500
East Riding of Yorkshire CouncilLocal authorities510
Hampshire County CouncilLocal authorities510

148 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.

Where the work is delivered
i

Where this supplier has delivered.

Delivery regions published on its awarded tenders. A tender with several regions counts in each.

Where the work was, not where the company is based.

Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 216 of 275 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region

RegionNoticesBids / lotSME winsLocal wins
East of England61 · 28%
North West England60 · 28%
South East England59 · 27%
Yorkshire and the Humber55 · 25%
East Midlands51 · 24%
Greater London47 · 22%
South West England44 · 20%
West Midlands43 · 20%
Scotland40 · 19%
North East England39 · 18%
Wales (Cymru)32 · 15%
Northern Ireland27 · 13%

Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.

How it is bought
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract 50% (137 notices)
  • Framework 39% (106 notices)
  • Dynamic purchasing system 12% (32 notices)
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open 41% (112 notices)
  • Route not published 29% (80 notices)
  • Selective 28% (76 notices)
  • Limited / restricted 2% (6 notices)
  • Direct award 0% (1 notices)
Threshold
i

How much of this market is above the legal threshold.

Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.

  • Above threshold 75% (41 notices)
  • Below threshold 25% (14 notices)
Typical tender window
i

How long bidders get to respond.

Middle value in days from the tender notice to its deadline.

All notices we hold, not just recent ones.

32 daysrobust · n=59median, notice to deadline

Competition

Contracts published in the last 36 months (76) · bid counts per lot from award notices · values are net contract awards, framework and DPS ceilings excluded · SME and local status as declared

Bids per lot · n=44
i

How the number of bidders is spread across lots.

Each lot with a published bid count is put in a band: one bid, two to three, four to six, seven or more. Real competitions only.

  • 1 bid 25% (11)
  • 2–3 32% (14)
  • 4–6 27% (12)
  • 7 or more 16% (7)
Contract value, net
i

The usual range of contract values here.

The middle half of published award values, VAT excluded, with the middle value marked. Framework ceilings are left out.

Published values, not actual spend.

p25 £163,171median £470,172p75 £1,386,329
interquartile range of 62 awards · p90 £14,265,353
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 44 lots from 27 competitions, last 36 months. 8 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 3.5) and 36 from older notices (bids received, middle 3).

Last 36 months.

3robust · n=27middle half 2–4
Competed
i

How much of this market is actually put out to competition.

Notices run as an open or selective procedure, out of all notices that say which procedure was used. Direct awards count as not competed.

51 of 55 notices that state a procedure, last 36 months. 21 more give no procedure and are left out.

Last 36 months.

93%robust · n=55
Bids from SMEs
i

What share of bids come from small and medium firms.

SME bids divided by all bids, on lots where the buyer published the split.

93 SME bids out of 137, on 38 lots where the buyer published the split.

Last 36 months.

68%robust · n=137
Awards won by SMEs
i

What share of contracts go to small and medium firms.

Awards to a single supplier that declared its size. SME divided by all.

19 of 31 awards where the winner declared its size.

Last 36 months.

61%robust · n=31
Won locally
i

How much work here goes to companies based in the region.

Contract awards where the winner’s registered address is in this region, out of awards where the address is known.

Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.

Last 36 months.

45%robust · n=44winner registered in the delivery region
Abandoned
i

How often a tender ends with no award.

Notices cancelled, withdrawn or marked unsuccessful, plus terminated ones that never got an award.

5 of 76 notices, last 36 months.

Only what buyers published. Tenders that quietly went nowhere are not counted.

Last 36 months.

7%robust · n=76
Frameworks & DPS: bidders per lot
i

How many companies apply to get onto a framework or DPS here.

Middle value per lot, frameworks and dynamic markets only. Getting onto a panel is not the same as winning work, so it is kept separate.

Based on 62 lots from 28 framework and DPS notices, last 36 months.

Last 36 months.

8robust · n=2891 vehicle procedures · admission to a panel, not a contest

Who wins
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 528 awards to 281 suppliers · the five most frequent winners hold 23% of contract awards in the last 36 months

Where to submit
i

Where bids for this work are submitted.

Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.

E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 79 of 275 notices name one · each portal page explains registration

Delta eSourcing11 notices · 14%
JAGGAER / BravoSolution11 notices · 14%
EU-Supply Complete Tender Management9 notices · 11% · 1 open
Proactis / ProContract9 notices · 11%
Public Contracts Scotland (PCS)6 notices · 8% · 1 open
SAP Ariba5 notices · 6%

Open tenders in monitoring and control services

7 live at the nightly build · soonest deadline first

Method

What the numbers on this page are and are not

Which notices count?

Every Find a Tender notice that carries a CPV code starting 7170. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Earliest notice 2021; latest 15 Sept 2026.

Competition figures

Lot-grain contest statistics over the last 36 months: a lot counts where its own CPV codes (or, for single-class notices, the procedure’s) start 7170; contracts and frameworks / DPS are kept apart. Each figure’s own method — grain, window, exclusions and this page’s sample — is behind its ; the long form is on Methodology.

Why no total value or month-by-month chart?

Sums of notice estimates repeat framework ceilings and mix net with gross. Monthly volumes per sector are not shown yet: the catalogue’s CPV coverage per notice changed in May 2026 (compiled records carry every lot’s codes), so a curve would show the catalogue, not the market.