Rochford District Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: Local-authority-districtNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACYLocal authorityEast of England8 Roche CloseRan 6 procurements for other authorities

Official UK PPONPMRR-6539-DYRW

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months70 in the prior 12 months
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot50% single-bid · 3 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share27%of 11 awarded procedures · 12 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

11 awarded tenders, 12 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months32 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£2.3mnet · on 4 of 4 published values · top 5 = 100%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 7 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(7 notices)
    7 of 7 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open71%(5 notices)
    5 of 7 notices are Open (71%).
  • Direct award14%(1 notices)
    1 of 7 notices are Direct award (14%).
  • Selective14%(1 notices)
    1 of 7 notices are Selective (14%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

5moderate · n=30% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 3 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

14 daysmoderate · n=3
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 7 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

14 of 7 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 2 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

10.4% below estimateindicative · n=2

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
O'HARA BROS. SURFACING LIMITED19.1%119 Mar 2026
Datagraphic Limited19.1%11—
ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY LTD19.1%11—
Quinn (London) Limited19.1%1122 May 2026
James Waste Management19.1%01—
Fusion Lifestyle19.1%01—
Betongpark Limited19.1%01—
Marlborough Highways Limited19.1%01—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 27% of 11 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 12 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£2.3mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 4 of 4 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 100%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£441k middle valuemoderate · n=4Middle half £146k–£863k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
The Mill Arts & Events Centre Compliance and Upgrade WorksQuinn (London) Limited22 May 20265 mo£1,347,433
Rochford District Council Corporate InsurancesZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY LTD——£701,660 †
EPP0326 The Approach Car Park Rayleigh ResurfacingO'HARA BROS. SURFACING LIMITED9 Mar 2026—£180,000
Hybrid MailDatagraphic Limited—1 yrs£43,660 †
≈ £44k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

9 of 11 contracts carry an end date, 4 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 25 of 19 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Rochford District Council Corporate InsurancesInsurance servicesAwarded / complete21 Oct 2026—
The Mill Arts & Events Centre Compliance and Upgrade WorksBuilding installation workAwarded / complete14 Oct 2026£1,700,000
EPP0282 Arboriculture Works to Urban and Rural Trees, RochfordForestry servicesPlanned5 Oct 2026£420,000
Hybrid MailAwarded / complete3 Sept 2026—
The Approach Car Park Rayleigh ResurfacingCarriageway resurfacing worksAwarded / complete25 Jun 2026£180,000
Mill Hall Arts & Events Centre OperatorOther communityAwarded / complete21 May 2026£5,000,000
Supply & Installation of Play Equipment Closed Frameworkprocuring entityAwarded / complete11 May 2026—
Supply & Installation of Play Equipment Closed Frameworkprocuring entityAwarded / complete6 May 2026—
Supply & Installation of Play Equipment Closed Frameworkprocuring entityAwarded / complete6 May 2026—
Supply & Installation of Play Equipment Closed Frameworkprocuring entityAwarded / complete6 May 2026—
Supply & Installation of Play Equipment Closed Frameworkprocuring entityAwarded / complete6 May 2026—
Supply & Installation of Play Equipment Closed FrameworkFrameworkprocuring entityField and court sports equipmentAwarded / complete23 Dec 2025£3,000,000
Station Road Car Park ResurfacingPaving and asphalting worksCancelled9 Dec 2025£180,000
Emergency Temporary and Nightly Let AccommodationHotel accommodation servicesOpen18 Jun 2024£250,000
For Receipt, Transport and Treatment by Recycling of Contract RecyclablesRefuse and waste related servicesAwarded / complete2 Apr 2024£1,200,000
Emergency Temporary and Nightly Let AccommodationFrameworkHotel accommodation servicesOpen21 Mar 2024£200,000
Leisure Services and Active Communities ContractRecreationalOpen6 Mar 2024£99,282,000
Skate ParksConstruction work for buildings relating to leisureAwarded / complete31 Jan 2024£450,000
Local Plan Transport AssessmentTransport systems consultancy servicesAwarded / complete13 Jun 2023£200,000
Advice Services CommissioningBenefit servicesAwarded / complete25 Aug 2022£252,000

Search all 19 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 9 of 11 published contracts have an end date; 4 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.