REDHILL ACADEMY TRUST: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
Companies House: PRI/LBG/NSC (Private, Limited by guarantee, no share capital, use of 'Limited' exemption)·East Midlands·Nottingham
Companies House07430317 ↗Websiteredhillacademytrust.org.uk ↗
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
Open notices
1 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build
| Notice | Deadline | Days left | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Redhill Academy Trust Dynamic Market for electricity and gas | 31 Jan 2028 | 468d | — |
What they buyi
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
i
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each
09 Petroleum, coal, oil and gas5 procedures · 63% · 1 open31 Electrical machinery3 procedures · 38% · 1 open65 Public utilities1 procedures · 13% · 1 open48 Software package and information systems1 procedures · 13%72 IT services: consulting, software, internet1 procedures · 13%79 Business services: law, marketing, consulting1 procedures · 13%How they buyi
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Last 24 months · 8 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract88%(7 notices)
7 of 8 notices are Contract (88%).Dynamic purchasing system13%(1 notices)
1 of 8 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (13%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Selective50%(4 notices)
4 of 8 notices are Selective (50%).Limited / restricted38%(3 notices)
3 of 8 notices are Limited / restricted (38%).Open13%(1 notices)
1 of 8 notices are Open (13%).
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on 8 notices across all categories, last 24 months.
i
Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.
Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.
Based on 3 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSE Energy Supply Limited | 2 | 28.6% | 2 | 4 | 25 Feb 2026 |
| SEFE Energy Limited | 2 | 28.6% | 2 | 4 | 25 Feb 2026 |
| Regent Gas Limited | 2 | 28.6% | 2 | 2 | 25 Feb 2026 |
| Brook Green Supply Limited | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 3 | 26 Jan 2026 |
| Crown Gas & Power | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 3 | 26 Jan 2026 |
| Securus Communications Limited | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 1 | — |
| ARBOR EDUCATION PARTNERS LIMITED | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 1 | — |
| Connex Education Partnership | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 1 | — |
7 awarded procedures across 9 suppliers: too few to describe concentration.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
i
The middle published award value for this buyer.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Supplier | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The supply of temporary teaching and non teaching staff | Connex Education Partnership | — | — | £1,800,000 † |
| Supply Internet and Cyber Security Services | Securus Communications Limited | — | — | £738,095 † |
| Supply of Education Management System | ARBOR EDUCATION PARTNERS LIMITED | — | — | £429,309 † |
| Lot 2. Redhill Academy Trust Half Hourly metered electricity | SSE Energy Supply Limited | 25 Feb 2026 | 2 yrs | £402,408 ≈ £201k/yr |
| Lot 1. Redhill Academy Trust Non-Half Hourly metered electricity | SEFE Energy Limited | 25 Feb 2026 | 2 yrs | £262,358 ≈ £131k/yr |
Recent procedures
Latest 11 of 11 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement
| Procedure | Status | Published | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supply Internet and Cyber Security ServicesInformation technology services | Awarded / complete | 23 Jul 2026 | — |
| Supply of Education Management SystemEducational software package | Awarded / complete | 3 Jun 2026 | — |
| The supply of temporary teaching and non teaching staffPlacement services of personnel | Awarded / complete | 3 Jun 2026 | — |
| Redhill Academy Trust - gas suppliesMains gas | Awarded / complete | 16 Mar 2026 | £250,000 |
| Redhill Academy Trust - electricity suppliesElectricity | Awarded / complete | 16 Mar 2026 | £668,400 |
| Redhill Academy Trust - electricity suppliesElectricity | Open | 27 Jan 2026 | £668,400 |
| Redhill Academy Trust - gas suppliesMains gas | Open | 27 Jan 2026 | £250,000 |
| PP-10108 Redhill Academy Trust CateringSchool catering services | Awarded / complete | 8 Apr 2025 | £1,425,000 |
| Printers and CopiersPhotocopiers | Open | 27 Sept 2024 | £250,000 |
| Payroll and HRMSPersonnel and payroll services | Open | 2 Feb 2024 | £300,000 |
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
- Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
- Contract end dates. 0 of 4 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.