Oxford Brookes University: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

DfE school register: Higher education institutionsEducationSouth East EnglandOxford

Official UK PPONPPGL-1164-DJLT

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed.

Notices, last 12 months54+238% vs prior 12 months (16)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot325% single-bid · 4 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 4 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share18%of 67 awarded procedures · 58 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

67 awarded tenders, 58 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months51 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published award value, 24m£13mnet · on 40 of 58 single-supplier awards · top 5 = 70%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 70 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract 100% (70 notices)
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award 54% (38 notices)
  • Limited / restricted 16% (11 notices)
  • Open 14% (10 notices)
  • Selective 11% (8 notices)
  • Route not published 4% (3 notices)
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 4 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3moderate · n=425% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from deadline to first award notice, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 4 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

27 daysmoderate · n=4
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 70 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

012 of 70 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 5 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimaterobust · n=5

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Jisc710.4%7711 Mar 2026
Jisc Services Ltd34.5%339 Sept 2026
Brook Young People T/a Brook23%2224 Sept 2026
Limbs & Things Limited23%121 Nov 2024
Bidwells11.5%1219 Jan 2026
Robertson Bell Ltd11.5%1220 Oct 2025
Softcat Plc11.5%1128 Aug 2026
The City of Oxford Motor Services Ltd T/A Oxford Bus Company11.5%118 May 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 18% of 67 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 58 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards — not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£13mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 40 of 58 single-supplier awards; the five largest make 70%; a further 15 published a VAT-inclusive amount only (£5.5m inc. VAT, kept apart).
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

What one of this buyer’s contracts is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£70k middle valuerobust · n=40Middle half £38k–£206k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Delivery of ULaw Courses on CampusUniversity of Law Limited—3.2 yrs£3,000,000 †
≈ £947k/yr
Student Records System (SRS) platform and associated support servicesELLUCIAN GLOBAL LIMITED1 Feb 20263 yrs£2,492,610
≈ £831k/yr
Oxford Brookes University Corporate Travel ProviderCorporate Travel Management (North) Limited——£2,000,000 †
HR System Renewal - People XDAccess UK Ltd——£960,481 †
In-Country RecruitmentGrok Global Services Inc26 Jun 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£825,000
≈ £275k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published end dates only · 41 of 65 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 82 procedures on this authority cluster, incl. beneficiary and procuring-entity roles

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Website Content Management System Replacement Project, Student App and Staff Intranet ProjectIT services: consultingWithdrawn17 Feb 2026£400,000
EMOS Staff and Student CardsAwarded / complete13 Feb 2026—
Secure Production and Distribution of Physical Higher Education Certificates and Electronic TranscriptsPrinting and delivery servicesAwarded / complete11 Feb 2026£480,000
Leakage Detection WorksWater plumbing workAwarded / complete20 Jan 2026—
Cholsey Boathouse ImprovementsConstruction project management servicesAwarded / complete19 Jan 2026—
Fire Protection remedial works - hall of Residence Reactive WorkAwarded / complete25 Nov 2025—
Sport & Active Wellness KitRecreationalPlanning17 Nov 2025£150,000
Maintenance of SALTO alarmsAwarded / complete10 Nov 2025—
Secure Production and Distribution of Physical Higher Education Certificates and Electronic TranscriptsPrinting and delivery servicesCancelled4 Nov 2025£480,000
E-Tendering SystemAwarded / complete23 Oct 2025—

Search all 82 procedures for this authority →

Data coverage & method
  • Source: Find a Tender OCDS releases; mixed PCR 2015 / Procurement Act 2023 history — no legal-regime label is applied.
  • Counts are procedures (one notice family), not lots. Authority cluster = canonical buyer plus beneficiary and procuring-entity roles.
  • Published procedure values exist on a minority of notices; their lifetime sum (£1.6m, ceilings stripped) is a catalogue fact, not spend, and is not shown as a headline.
  • Awards on procedures published in the last 24 months: 59 award records on 57 procedures (58 to a single canonical supplier, 1 multi-supplier). 37 values come from the contract record when the award carried none; 15 awards published only a VAT-inclusive amount and are counted but not valued.
  • Bid counts, deadline-to-award, amendments and award-vs-estimate come from the nightly buyer analytics row; each figure’s own method and sample is behind its , the long form on Methodology.
  • Contract end dates: 41 of 65 published contracts carry a period end; 5 end within 18 months, 1 within 6.
  • Never shown: contact details, predicted winners, payment behaviour, or “who to invite”.
Identifiers consolidated into this page (8 historical Find a Tender publication identifiers)

Official notices referenced this authority under these publication identifiers. Alias URLs are not separate pages.

GB-FTS-128860GB-FTS-184309GB-FTS-26977GB-FTS-35043GB-FTS-36089GB-FTS-48319GB-UKPRN-10004930GB-UKPRN-PPGL-1164-DJLT

Canonical page id: GB-PPON-PPGL-1164-DJLT