English Heritage Trust: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
South West England·Swindon
Charity Commission1140351 ↗
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.
Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.
18 awarded tenders, 29 different suppliers.
Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sykes and Son Limited | 2 | 11.1% | 0 | 12 | — |
| RSK Hi-Line | 2 | 11.1% | 0 | 4 | — |
| The Environmental Partnership (TEP) | 2 | 11.1% | 0 | 2 | — |
| Selmec (Lincoln) LTD | 1 | 5.6% | 0 | 4 | — |
| Feilden and Mawson LLP | 1 | 5.6% | 0 | 4 | — |
| R Moulding and Co (Salisbury) Limited | 1 | 5.6% | 0 | 3 | — |
| Historic Property Restoration Ltd | 1 | 5.6% | 0 | 3 | — |
| Whitehead Building Services | 1 | 5.6% | 0 | 3 | — |
The three most frequent suppliers are named on 22% of 18 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 29 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
Published end dates only · 51 of 59 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Holder | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Programme – System Implementation and Support Partner | cloudThing Limited | 3 Feb 2027 | £2,277,188 |
| Grounds Maintenance Service - West Territory - Lot 16 - Devon and Cornwall | Parsons Landscapes Limited | 2 Apr 2028 | £1,532,961 |
| Grounds Maintenance Service - London Territory - Lot 9A - London Mansions Group | Ground Control Limited | 2 Apr 2028 | £2,319,173 |
| Grounds Maintenance Service - London Territory - Lot 9B - Eltham Palace Group | Todd Contracting Limited | 2 Apr 2028 | £1,310,135 |
Recent procedures
Latest 37 of 37 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
- Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
- Contract end dates. 51 of 59 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.