Official UK procurement notice
Mobile Smart Ticketing (MST)
Authority: Rail Delivery Group (Public body)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionThe rail industry is progressing toward digital-first ticketing to reduce cost of sale, improve customer experience, and enable flexible products such as season tickets, PAYG and a roadmap toward single and return tickets.
The Mobile Smart Ticketing (MST) initiative (migrating physical ITSO media to a digital format) aims to enable secure, standards-based ticket fulfilment to mobile devices. Initial launch will centre on a pilot for Season tickets, followed by PAYG, and then expansion into singles and returns.
In addition, current fulfilment methods for rail (e.g. barcode, physical smartcard, paper) are isolated today, with retailers and integrators required to support multiple fulfilment technologies, each with distinct standards and operational overhead.
Mobile Smart Ticketing offers the potential for the following:
- Elimination of the downsides of current plastic ITSO cards which have to be obtained and updated prior to travel;
- Customers will no longer have to use a separate app to view journey history and product validity;
- Improved gate line speeds - customers will benefit from features such as NFC reader functionality, removing the need to unlock devices or open apps to pass through gates;
- Over-the-air cancellations will also deliver enhanced fraud protection to the industry.
A national rail pilot is targeted for delivery by mid-end 2027, focusing on:
- Limited geography and/or Train Operating Company (TOC) deployment;
- Season ticket products as initial use case to prove the technology and proposition;
- Expansion path to PAYG.
Beyond the pilot, RDG in collaboration with industry partners (e.g., FTR Programme, TOCs, etc) will develop a scalable roadmap to deliver singles and returns.
Alongside the Mobile Smart Ticketing initiative, there is an opportunity to explore whether a centralised fulfilment orchestration layer could:
- Reduce complexity for retailers/integrators;
- Standardise interfaces across fulfilment media;
- Lower long-term cost of sale;
- This is exploratory and not a defined requirement of the pilot.
Requirements are as follows:
Functional Requirements
- Support secure mobile ticket fulfilment aligned to ITSO Version 2.1.5;
- Enable season ticket products at launch;
- Provide clear roadmap to PAYG and singles & returns enablement;
- Support lifecycle management (issue, update, revoke, renew, replace, etc);
- Enable inspection/validation in existing rail environments.
Technical Requirements
- Compatibility with secure element-based implementations (DESFire);
- Integration with existing retailing and RDG back-office systems;
- Scalable architecture for a national deployment;
- Support for multiple mobile wallet ecosystems;
- API-driven integration model.
Operational Requirements
- High availability and resilience;
- 24/7 customer support and recovery mechanisms (lost device, change of device, re-provisioning);
- Enhanced monitoring and reporting capabilities;
- Security and compliance aligned to RSP rail standards.
Commercial Requirements
- Transparent pricing model (setup, per-transaction, ongoing OPEX, lifecycle costs);
- Scalable commercial structure for national rollout with economies of scale;
- Clarity on licensing and third-party dependencies.
Strategic / Future Requirements
- Potential flexibility to support additional fulfilment media;
- Potential to integrate with a central fulfilment orchestration layer;
- Interoperability across TOCs and geographies.
CPV: Railway traffic control software development services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedPipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How Rail Delivery Group buys Programming services of packaged software products (CPV 7221), and who usually turns up
Rail Delivery Group’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Programming services of packaged software products (CPV 7221) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
No small-firm winners recorded among this authority’s published awards in this sample.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered in the delivery region.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards were announced within 70 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid20%
2–340%
4–620%
7+20%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1CPV 7221Estimate not published
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 79 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid4%
2–332%
4–633%
7+32%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Utilities
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 9 Apr 2026, 08:35 BST
- Last source update
- 13 Apr 2026, 12:55 BST
- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-033252- Latest notice
- Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-067e73Find a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
9 Apr 2026 → 1 Jun 2026 · 4 dates- Planning notice published194 days ago9 Apr 2026, 08:35 BST
- Latest notice published190 days ago13 Apr 2026, 12:55 BST
- Market engagement152 days ago21 May 2026, 23:59 BST
To receive a copy of the MST MOI / MEQ please email Sam Stevens:
- Contract starts142 days ago1 Jun 2026, 00:00 BST
Notice history
2 events · 2 releases on Find a Tender · since 9 Apr 2026- Preliminary market engagement notice published9 Apr 2026, 08:35 BSTUK2
- Preliminary market engagement notice published13 Apr 2026, 12:55 BSTUK2
Published amendments (1)
Added a note about how to receive the MST MOI/MEQ, and set the contact email address to Sam Stevens, rather than the generic procurement email address.
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (2)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender