Lot 1
No lot description published.
Buyer: SEVERN TRENT WATER LIMITED →
Preliminary Market Engagement Digital Contractor Control of Work Platform Background Severn Trent Water is seeking information from the market regarding SaaS solutions capable of digitising and governing the lifecycle of contractor management and work authorisation activities. Current processes are fragmented across email, spreadsheets, SharePoint, paper records and localised working practices. There are opportunities to improve visibility, consistency, auditability and operational efficiency. The organisation wishes to understand the maturity of the market and identify potential SaaS solutions that could support a future procurement exercise. This market engagement is not a call for competition, invitation to tender or commitment to procure. Business Problem Severn Trent requires a solution that provides consistent governance and visibility over contractor activities occurring across operational sites and facilities. The organisation seeks to: • Improve contractor governance and compliance • Digitise contractor work authorisation processes • Reduce administrative effort • Improve management visibility • Strengthen auditability • Improve consistency across business units • Improve efficiency by digitising manual processes • Maintain a clear record of contractor competence, approvals and activities Scope The scope may include: • Wastewater operations • Water operations • Bio Resources • Property • Other operational business functions Suppliers should identify whether their platform can support deployment across multiple business units using common workflows whilst maintaining local operational flexibility. Existing Business Processes The organisation currently operates contractor governance and work authorisation processes which include: • Contractor approvals • Site attendance acceptance • Work authorisation • RAMS review • Permit controls Desired Outcomes The solution should provide: 1. Contractor Governance The ability to maintain a central contractor repository containing: • Contractor information • Competency records • Insurance information • Accreditation records • Authorisations • Expiry management • Supporting documentation 2. Work Authorisation The ability to: • Receive contractor work requests • Review and approve requests • Apply site-specific controls • Communicate site hazards • Authorise work • Track work status • Close activities 3. RAMS Management The ability to: • Receive RAMS submissions • Review and approve RAMS • Reject and request amendments • Version control submissions • Maintain an audit trail 4. Permit Management The ability to: • Create permits • Approve permits • Track permits • Close permits • View current and historical permits • Support a variety of permit types Examples may include: • Hot works • Confined space • Excavations • Electrical work • Contractor work authorisations 5. Visibility and Control The ability to: • View current activities • View future planned activities • View historical activities • Report on contractor performance • Report on compliance activity • Identify conflicting activities 6. Auditing and Assurance The ability to: • Record audits • Record inspections • Record assurance activities • Track actions • Maintain full audit trails 7. Mobility The solution should support: • Mobile devices • Operational users • Contractors • Remote working • Field-based approvals Non-Functional Requirements Suppliers should comment on: • SaaS deployment model • UK hosting options • Cyber security accreditations • Identity management • Single Sign-On • Zero Trust Architecture • API capability • Data export capability • Business continuity • Disaster recovery • Mobile capability • Offline working • Accessibility Suppliers are not expected to understand current process names or terminology. Instead, suppliers should explain: How their product would support: • Repeat contractor authorisations • Site-specific approval processes • Work authorisation workflows • Contractor governance • Permit-to-work processes without requiring bespoke development. Solution Architecture Suppliers should describe their proposed solution architecture and indicate whether the capabilities described in this PME are delivered through: • A single SaaS platform • Multiple integrated modules within a common platform • Multiple products requiring integration • Custom-developed functionality • Third-party partner products Severn Trent recognises that these capabilities may not necessarily be delivered through a single product. Suppliers should clearly identify: • Which capabilities are native • Which capabilities require configuration • Which capabilities require integration • Which capabilities require custom development Responses should explain any implementation, support, licensing or operational implications arising from the proposed architecture. Suppliers should describe the largest customer environments currently supported by their platform, including: • Number of sites • Number of contractor organisations • Number of users • Geographic coverage Supplier Response Instructions Supplier responses must be submitted through SAP Business Network. Responses should be concise and focused on the requirements described in this PME. Responses should comprise: 1. Supplier Overview (maximum 2 pages) Please provide: • Company name • Product name(s) • Headquarters location • Approximate number of employees • Relevant industry sectors served • Utility sector experience • Water sector experience • • 2. Solution Overview (maximum 5 pages) Describe: • How your solution addresses the business problem described in this PME • Key differentiators • Typical deployment model • Typical implementation approach • Mobile capabilities • Reporting and analytics capabilities Please avoid generic marketing material where possible. 3. Architecture Statement (maximum 2 pages) Describe: • Whether the solution is provided as: o A single SaaS platform o Multiple modules within a common platform o Multiple integrated products o A partially bespoke solution • Any third-party products required • Any custom development required • Any significant implementation dependencies 4. Capability Response For each requirement identify whether the capability is: • Native • Configurable • Integration required • Custom development required • Roadmap • Not available Suppliers should provide explanatory comments where appropriate. 5. Customer Scale (maximum 2 pages) Provide examples of the largest customer environments currently supported, including: • Number of sites • Number of contractor organisations • Number of users • Geographic footprint 6. Commercial Model (maximum 2 pages) Provide high-level indicative pricing information including: • Licence model • Charging basis • Typical implementation costs • Typical support costs • Typical integration costs Detailed pricing is not required at this stage.
UKC, GB · UKD, GB · UKE, GB · UKF, GB · UKG, GB · UKH, GB · UKI, GB · UKJ, GB · UKK, GB
No lot description published.
| Item | Category | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Software package and information systems | Not published |
Benchmarked against retained Find a Tender procedures with CPV division 48. The category anchor is Software package and information systems (48000000); this is a deliberately broad market comparator. The comparison is shown at several levels rather than pretending one company or region is always the best benchmark.
| Comparison set | Procedures | Reported bids per procedure | Named award suppliers | Price evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market: CPV division 48 | 6,837 | 1 median · 9.6 average (2,488 of 6,837 with a bid count) | 1.8 average (2,928 of 6,837 with named award suppliers) | Not published |
| Same buyer | 4 | Not published | 1 average (1 of 4 with named award suppliers) | Not published |
| Delivery region: UKC | 295 | 1 median · 6 average (112 of 295 with a bid count) | 1.7 average (131 of 295 with named award suppliers) | Not published |
“Reported bids” is an official aggregate, sometimes reported per lot; it is the closest available competition measure. “Named award suppliers” are winners, not all applicants.
Not enough comparable procedures currently publish both a GBP tender value and a usable lowest-valid-bid value to calculate a responsible price-reduction benchmark. Tenderline deliberately does not infer a saving from named award suppliers or from missing award values.
| Milestone | Type | Due | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preliminary Market Engagement Digital Contractor Control of Work Platform Background Severn Trent Water is seeking information from the market regarding SaaS solutions capable of digitising and governing the lifecycle of contractor management and work authorisation activities. Current processes are fragmented across email, spreadsheets, SharePoint, paper records and localised working practices. There are opportunities to improve visibility, consistency, auditability and operational efficiency. The organisation wishes to understand the maturity of the market and identify potential SaaS solutions that could support a future procurement exercise. This market engagement is not a call for competition, invitation to tender or commitment to procure. Business Problem Severn Trent requires a solution that provides consistent governance and visibility over contractor activities occurring across operational sites and facilities. The organisation seeks to: • Improve contractor governance and compliance • Digitise contractor work authorisation processes • Reduce administrative effort • Improve management visibility • Strengthen auditability • Improve consistency across business units • Improve efficiency by digitising manual processes • Maintain a clear record of contractor competence, approvals and activities Scope The scope may include: • Wastewater operations • Water operations • Bio Resources • Property • Other operational business functions Suppliers should identify whether their platform can support deployment across multiple business units using common workflows whilst maintaining local operational flexibility. Existing Business Processes The organisation currently operates contractor governance and work authorisation processes which include: • Contractor approvals • Site attendance acceptance • Work authorisation • RAMS review • Permit controls Desired Outcomes The solution should provide: 1. Contractor Governance The ability to maintain a central contractor repository containing: • Contractor information • Competency records • Insurance information • Accreditation records • Authorisations • Expiry management • Supporting documentation 2. Work Authorisation The ability to: • Receive contractor work requests • Review and approve requests • Apply site-specific controls • Communicate site hazards • Authorise work • Track work status • Close activities 3. RAMS Management The ability to: • Receive RAMS submissions • Review and approve RAMS • Reject and request amendments • Version control submissions • Maintain an audit trail 4. Permit Management The ability to: • Create permits • Approve permits • Track permits • Close permits • View current and historical permits • Support a variety of permit types Examples may include: • Hot works • Confined space • Excavations • Electrical work • Contractor work authorisations 5. Visibility and Control The ability to: • View current activities • View future planned activities • View historical activities • Report on contractor performance • Report on compliance activity • Identify conflicting activities 6. Auditing and Assurance The ability to: • Record audits • Record inspections • Record assurance activities • Track actions • Maintain full audit trails 7. Mobility The solution should support: • Mobile devices • Operational users • Contractors • Remote working • Field-based approvals Non-Functional Requirements Suppliers should comment on: • SaaS deployment model • UK hosting options • Cyber security accreditations • Identity management • Single Sign-On • Zero Trust Architecture • API capability • Data export capability • Business continuity • Disaster recovery • Mobile capability • Offline working • Accessibility Suppliers are not expected to understand current process names or terminology. Instead, suppliers should explain: How their product would support: • Repeat contractor authorisations • Site-specific approval processes • Work authorisation workflows • Contractor governance • Permit-to-work processes without requiring bespoke development. Solution Architecture Suppliers should describe their proposed solution architecture and indicate whether the capabilities described in this PME are delivered through: • A single SaaS platform • Multiple integrated modules within a common platform • Multiple products requiring integration • Custom-developed functionality • Third-party partner products Severn Trent recognises that these capabilities may not necessarily be delivered through a single product. Suppliers should clearly identify: • Which capabilities are native • Which capabilities require configuration • Which capabilities require integration • Which capabilities require custom development Responses should explain any implementation, support, licensing or operational implications arising from the proposed architecture. Suppliers should describe the largest customer environments currently supported by their platform, including: • Number of sites • Number of contractor organisations • Number of users • Geographic coverage Supplier Response Instructions Supplier responses must be submitted through SAP Business Network only at https://portal.us.bn.cloud.ariba.com/dashboard/public/appext/comsapsbncdiscoveryui#/RfxEvent/preview/1110019370?anId=ANONYMOUS Or navigate directly to SAP Business Network and search "Digital Contractor Control of Work Platform", "ID - 1110019370" or "Doc3232950799". If you experience an issue with SAP Business Network contact SAP in the first instance. Responses should be concise and focused on the requirements described in this PME. Responses should comprise: 1. Supplier Overview (maximum 2 pages) Please provide: • Company name • Product name(s) • Headquarters location • Approximate number of employees • Relevant industry sectors served • Utility sector experience • Water sector experience • • 2. Solution Overview (maximum 5 pages) Describe: • How your solution addresses the business problem described in this PME • Key differentiators • Typical deployment model • Typical implementation approach • Mobile capabilities • Reporting and analytics capabilities Please avoid generic marketing material where possible. 3. Architecture Statement (maximum 2 pages) Describe: • Whether the solution is provided as: o A single SaaS platform o Multiple modules within a common platform o Multiple integrated products o A partially bespoke solution • Any third-party products required • Any custom development required • Any significant implementation dependencies 4. Capability Response For each requirement identify whether the capability is: • Native • Configurable • Integration required • Custom development required • Roadmap • Not available Suppliers should provide explanatory comments where appropriate. 5. Customer Scale (maximum 2 pages) Provide examples of the largest customer environments currently supported, including: • Number of sites • Number of contractor organisations • Number of users • Geographic footprint 6. Commercial Model (maximum 2 pages) Provide high-level indicative pricing information including: • Licence model • Charging basis • Typical implementation costs • Typical support costs • Typical integration costs Detailed pricing is not required at this stage. | engagement | 1 Sept 2026 | scheduled |
No linked framework, prior procurement or reprocurement published.
Diagnostic view. “Not published” means this current release does not provide a value.
| OCID | ocds-h6vhtk-06cff2 |
|---|---|
| Latest release ID | 068738-2026 |
| Latest release timestamp | Tue Jul 21 2026 13:20:25 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) |
| Source | find-a-tender |
| Official notice URL | Not published |
| Tender status | planning |
| Procurement method | Not published |
| Procurement method details | Not published |
| Main procurement category | goods |
| Above threshold | Yes |
| Legal basis | 2023/54 |
| Tender period: start | Not published |
| Tender period: end | Not published |
| Expression of interest deadline | Not published |
| Enquiry deadline | Not published |
| Award period: start | Not published |
| Award period: end | Not published |
| Submission method details | Not published |
| Submission languages | Not published |
| Electronic catalogue policy | Not published |
| Total tender value | Not published |
| Tender lots in source | 1 |
| Tender items in source | 1 |
| Tender documents in source | 0 |
| Awards in latest release | 0 |
| Contracts in latest release | 0 |
| Parties in latest release | 1 |
| Date | Event | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Jul 2026 | planning | 068738-2026 |
Unmodified official OCDS data retained by Tenderline for this procurement process.
{
"id": "068738-2026",
"tag": [
"planning"
],
"date": "2026-07-21T14:20:25+01:00",
"ocid": "ocds-h6vhtk-06cff2",
"buyer": {
"id": "GB-COH-02366686",
"name": "SEVERN TRENT WATER LIMITED"
},
"tender": {
"id": "ocds-h6vhtk-06cff2",
"lots": [
{
"id": "1",
"status": "planning",
"hasRenewal": true,
"suitability": {
"sme": true
},
"contractPeriod": {
"endDate": "2030-06-30T23:59:59+01:00",
"startDate": "2027-07-01T00:00:00+01:00",
"maxExtentDate": "2033-06-30T23:59:59+01:00"
}
}
],
"items": [
{
"id": "1",
"relatedLot": "1",
"deliveryAddresses": [
{
"region": "UKC",
"country": "GB",
"countryName": "United Kingdom"
},
{
"region": "UKD",
"country": "GB",
"countryName": "United Kingdom"
},
{
"region": "UKE",
"country": "GB",
"countryName": "United Kingdom"
},
{
"region": "UKF",
"country": "GB",
"countryName": "United Kingdom"
},
{
"region": "UKG",
"country": "GB",
"countryName": "United Kingdom"
},
{
"region": "UKH",
"country": "GB",
"countryName": "United Kingdom"
},
{
"region": "UKI",
"country": "GB",
"countryName": "United Kingdom"
},
{
"region": "UKJ",
"country": "GB",
"countryName": "United Kingdom"
},
{
"region": "UKK",
"country": "GB",
"countryName": "United Kingdom"
}
],
"additionalClassifications": [
{
"id": "48000000",
"scheme": "CPV",
"description": "Software package and information systems"
}
]
}
],
"title": "Digital Contractor Control of Work Platform",
"status": "planning",
"legalBasis": {
"id": "2023/54",
"uri": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/54/contents",
"scheme": "UKPGA"
},
"description": "Preliminary Market Engagement\nDigital Contractor Control of Work Platform\nBackground\nSevern Trent Water is seeking information from the market regarding SaaS solutions capable of digitising and governing the lifecycle of contractor management and work authorisation activities.\nCurrent processes are fragmented across email, spreadsheets, SharePoint, paper records and localised working practices. There are opportunities to improve visibility, consistency, auditability and operational efficiency.\nThe organisation wishes to understand the maturity of the market and identify potential SaaS solutions that could support a future procurement exercise.\nThis market engagement is not a call for competition, invitation to tender or commitment to procure.\nBusiness Problem\nSevern Trent requires a solution that provides consistent governance and visibility over contractor activities occurring across operational sites and facilities.\nThe organisation seeks to:\n•\tImprove contractor governance and compliance\n•\tDigitise contractor work authorisation processes\n•\tReduce administrative effort\n•\tImprove management visibility\n•\tStrengthen auditability\n•\tImprove consistency across business units\n•\tImprove efficiency by digitising manual processes\n•\tMaintain a clear record of contractor competence, approvals and activities\nScope\nThe scope may include:\n•\tWastewater operations\n•\tWater operations\n•\tBio Resources\n•\tProperty\n•\tOther operational business functions\nSuppliers should identify whether their platform can support deployment across multiple business units using common workflows whilst maintaining local operational flexibility.\nExisting Business Processes\nThe organisation currently operates contractor governance and work authorisation processes which include:\n•\tContractor approvals\n•\tSite attendance acceptance\n•\tWork authorisation\n•\tRAMS review\n•\tPermit controls\nDesired Outcomes\nThe solution should provide:\n1. Contractor Governance\nThe ability to maintain a central contractor repository containing:\n•\tContractor information\n•\tCompetency records\n•\tInsurance information\n•\tAccreditation records\n•\tAuthorisations\n•\tExpiry management\n•\tSupporting documentation\n2. Work Authorisation\nThe ability to:\n•\tReceive contractor work requests\n•\tReview and approve requests\n•\tApply site-specific controls\n•\tCommunicate site hazards\n•\tAuthorise work\n•\tTrack work status\n•\tClose activities\n3. RAMS Management\nThe ability to:\n•\tReceive RAMS submissions\n•\tReview and approve RAMS\n•\tReject and request amendments\n•\tVersion control submissions\n•\tMaintain an audit trail\n4. Permit Management\nThe ability to:\n•\tCreate permits\n•\tApprove permits\n•\tTrack permits\n•\tClose permits\n•\tView current and historical permits\n•\tSupport a variety of permit types\nExamples may include:\n•\tHot works\n•\tConfined space\n•\tExcavations\n•\tElectrical work\n•\tContractor work authorisations\n5. Visibility and Control\nThe ability to:\n•\tView current activities\n•\tView future planned activities\n•\tView historical activities\n•\tReport on contractor performance\n•\tReport on compliance activity\n•\tIdentify conflicting activities\n6. Auditing and Assurance\nThe ability to:\n•\tRecord audits\n•\tRecord inspections\n•\tRecord assurance activities\n•\tTrack actions\n•\tMaintain full audit trails\n7. Mobility\nThe solution should support:\n•\tMobile devices\n•\tOperational users\n•\tContractors\n•\tRemote working\n•\tField-based approvals\nNon-Functional Requirements\nSuppliers should comment on:\n•\tSaaS deployment model\n•\tUK hosting options\n•\tCyber security accreditations\n•\tIdentity management\n•\tSingle Sign-On\n•\tZero Trust Architecture\n•\tAPI capability\n•\tData export capability\n•\tBusiness continuity\n•\tDisaster recovery\n•\tMobile capability\n•\tOffline working\n•\tAccessibility\nSuppliers are not expected to understand current process names or terminology.\nInstead, suppliers should explain:\nHow their product would support:\n•\tRepeat contractor authorisations\n•\tSite-specific approval processes\n•\tWork authorisation workflows\n•\tContractor governance\n•\tPermit-to-work processes\nwithout requiring bespoke development.\nSolution Architecture\nSuppliers should describe their proposed solution architecture and indicate whether the capabilities described in this PME are delivered through:\n•\tA single SaaS platform\n•\tMultiple integrated modules within a common platform\n•\tMultiple products requiring integration\n•\tCustom-developed functionality\n•\tThird-party partner products\nSevern Trent recognises that these capabilities may not necessarily be delivered through a single product.\nSuppliers should clearly identify:\n•\tWhich capabilities are native\n•\tWhich capabilities require configuration\n•\tWhich capabilities require integration\n•\tWhich capabilities require custom development\nResponses should explain any implementation, support, licensing or operational implications arising from the proposed architecture.\nSuppliers should describe the largest customer environments currently supported by their platform, including:\n•\tNumber of sites\n•\tNumber of contractor organisations\n•\tNumber of users\n•\tGeographic coverage\nSupplier Response Instructions\nSupplier responses must be submitted through SAP Business Network.\nResponses should be concise and focused on the requirements described in this PME.\nResponses should comprise:\n1. Supplier Overview (maximum 2 pages)\nPlease provide:\n•\tCompany name\n•\tProduct name(s)\n•\tHeadquarters location\n•\tApproximate number of employees\n•\tRelevant industry sectors served\n•\tUtility sector experience\n•\tWater sector experience\n•\t\n•\t2. Solution Overview (maximum 5 pages)\nDescribe:\n•\tHow your solution addresses the business problem described in this PME\n•\tKey differentiators\n•\tTypical deployment model\n•\tTypical implementation approach\n•\tMobile capabilities\n•\tReporting and analytics capabilities\nPlease avoid generic marketing material where possible.\n3. Architecture Statement (maximum 2 pages)\nDescribe:\n•\tWhether the solution is provided as: \no\tA single SaaS platform\no\tMultiple modules within a common platform\no\tMultiple integrated products\no\tA partially bespoke solution\n•\tAny third-party products required\n•\tAny custom development required\n•\tAny significant implementation dependencies\n4. Capability Response \nFor each requirement identify whether the capability is:\n•\tNative\n•\tConfigurable\n•\tIntegration required\n•\tCustom development required\n•\tRoadmap\n•\tNot available\nSuppliers should provide explanatory comments where appropriate.\n5. Customer Scale (maximum 2 pages)\nProvide examples of the largest customer environments currently supported, including:\n•\tNumber of sites\n•\tNumber of contractor organisations\n•\tNumber of users\n•\tGeographic footprint\n6. Commercial Model (maximum 2 pages)\nProvide high-level indicative pricing information including:\n•\tLicence model\n•\tCharging basis\n•\tTypical implementation costs\n•\tTypical support costs\n•\tTypical integration costs\nDetailed pricing is not required at this stage.",
"specialRegime": [
"utilities"
],
"aboveThreshold": true,
"mainProcurementCategory": "goods"
},
"parties": [
{
"id": "GB-COH-02366686",
"name": "SEVERN TRENT WATER LIMITED",
"roles": [
"buyer"
],
"address": {
"region": "UKG33",
"country": "GB",
"locality": "Coventry",
"postalCode": "CV1 2LZ",
"countryName": "United Kingdom",
"streetAddress": "Severn Trent Centre"
},
"details": {
"url": "http://www.severntrent.com",
"classifications": [
{
"id": "privateUtility",
"scheme": "UK_CA_TYPE",
"description": "Private utility"
}
]
},
"identifier": {
"id": "02366686",
"scheme": "GB-COH"
},
"contactPoint": {
"name": "Jason Luck",
"email": "Jason.Luck@severntrent.co.uk"
},
"additionalIdentifiers": [
{
"id": "PQQN-5222-QDXR",
"scheme": "GB-PPON"
}
]
}
],
"language": "en",
"planning": {
"documents": [
{
"id": "068738-2026",
"url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/068738-2026",
"format": "text/html",
"noticeType": "UK2",
"description": "Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender",
"documentType": "marketEngagementNotice",
"datePublished": "2026-07-21T14:20:25+01:00"
}
],
"milestones": [
{
"id": "engagement",
"type": "engagement",
"status": "scheduled",
"dueDate": "2026-09-01T23:59:59+01:00",
"description": "Preliminary Market Engagement\nDigital Contractor Control of Work Platform\nBackground\nSevern Trent Water is seeking information from the market regarding SaaS solutions capable of digitising and governing the lifecycle of contractor management and work authorisation activities.\nCurrent processes are fragmented across email, spreadsheets, SharePoint, paper records and localised working practices. There are opportunities to improve visibility, consistency, auditability and operational efficiency.\nThe organisation wishes to understand the maturity of the market and identify potential SaaS solutions that could support a future procurement exercise.\nThis market engagement is not a call for competition, invitation to tender or commitment to procure.\nBusiness Problem\nSevern Trent requires a solution that provides consistent governance and visibility over contractor activities occurring across operational sites and facilities.\nThe organisation seeks to:\n•\tImprove contractor governance and compliance\n•\tDigitise contractor work authorisation processes\n•\tReduce administrative effort\n•\tImprove management visibility\n•\tStrengthen auditability\n•\tImprove consistency across business units\n•\tImprove efficiency by digitising manual processes\n•\tMaintain a clear record of contractor competence, approvals and activities\nScope\nThe scope may include:\n•\tWastewater operations\n•\tWater operations\n•\tBio Resources\n•\tProperty\n•\tOther operational business functions\nSuppliers should identify whether their platform can support deployment across multiple business units using common workflows whilst maintaining local operational flexibility.\nExisting Business Processes\nThe organisation currently operates contractor governance and work authorisation processes which include:\n•\tContractor approvals\n•\tSite attendance acceptance\n•\tWork authorisation\n•\tRAMS review\n•\tPermit controls\nDesired Outcomes\nThe solution should provide:\n1. Contractor Governance\nThe ability to maintain a central contractor repository containing:\n•\tContractor information\n•\tCompetency records\n•\tInsurance information\n•\tAccreditation records\n•\tAuthorisations\n•\tExpiry management\n•\tSupporting documentation\n2. Work Authorisation\nThe ability to:\n•\tReceive contractor work requests\n•\tReview and approve requests\n•\tApply site-specific controls\n•\tCommunicate site hazards\n•\tAuthorise work\n•\tTrack work status\n•\tClose activities\n3. RAMS Management\nThe ability to:\n•\tReceive RAMS submissions\n•\tReview and approve RAMS\n•\tReject and request amendments\n•\tVersion control submissions\n•\tMaintain an audit trail\n4. Permit Management\nThe ability to:\n•\tCreate permits\n•\tApprove permits\n•\tTrack permits\n•\tClose permits\n•\tView current and historical permits\n•\tSupport a variety of permit types\nExamples may include:\n•\tHot works\n•\tConfined space\n•\tExcavations\n•\tElectrical work\n•\tContractor work authorisations\n5. Visibility and Control\nThe ability to:\n•\tView current activities\n•\tView future planned activities\n•\tView historical activities\n•\tReport on contractor performance\n•\tReport on compliance activity\n•\tIdentify conflicting activities\n6. Auditing and Assurance\nThe ability to:\n•\tRecord audits\n•\tRecord inspections\n•\tRecord assurance activities\n•\tTrack actions\n•\tMaintain full audit trails\n7. Mobility\nThe solution should support:\n•\tMobile devices\n•\tOperational users\n•\tContractors\n•\tRemote working\n•\tField-based approvals\nNon-Functional Requirements\nSuppliers should comment on:\n•\tSaaS deployment model\n•\tUK hosting options\n•\tCyber security accreditations\n•\tIdentity management\n•\tSingle Sign-On\n•\tZero Trust Architecture\n•\tAPI capability\n•\tData export capability\n•\tBusiness continuity\n•\tDisaster recovery\n•\tMobile capability\n•\tOffline working\n•\tAccessibility\nSuppliers are not expected to understand current process names or terminology.\nInstead, suppliers should explain:\nHow their product would support:\n•\tRepeat contractor authorisations\n•\tSite-specific approval processes\n•\tWork authorisation workflows\n•\tContractor governance\n•\tPermit-to-work processes\nwithout requiring bespoke development.\nSolution Architecture\nSuppliers should describe their proposed solution architecture and indicate whether the capabilities described in this PME are delivered through:\n•\tA single SaaS platform\n•\tMultiple integrated modules within a common platform\n•\tMultiple products requiring integration\n•\tCustom-developed functionality\n•\tThird-party partner products\nSevern Trent recognises that these capabilities may not necessarily be delivered through a single product.\nSuppliers should clearly identify:\n•\tWhich capabilities are native\n•\tWhich capabilities require configuration\n•\tWhich capabilities require integration\n•\tWhich capabilities require custom development\nResponses should explain any implementation, support, licensing or operational implications arising from the proposed architecture.\nSuppliers should describe the largest customer environments currently supported by their platform, including:\n•\tNumber of sites\n•\tNumber of contractor organisations\n•\tNumber of users\n•\tGeographic coverage\nSupplier Response Instructions\nSupplier responses must be submitted through SAP Business Network only at https://portal.us.bn.cloud.ariba.com/dashboard/public/appext/comsapsbncdiscoveryui#/RfxEvent/preview/1110019370?anId=ANONYMOUS\nOr navigate directly to SAP Business Network and search \n\"Digital Contractor Control of Work Platform\", \"ID - 1110019370\" or \"Doc3232950799\". If you experience an issue with SAP Business Network contact SAP in the first instance.\nResponses should be concise and focused on the requirements described in this PME.\nResponses should comprise:\n1. Supplier Overview (maximum 2 pages)\nPlease provide:\n•\tCompany name\n•\tProduct name(s)\n•\tHeadquarters location\n•\tApproximate number of employees\n•\tRelevant industry sectors served\n•\tUtility sector experience\n•\tWater sector experience\n•\t\n•\t2. Solution Overview (maximum 5 pages)\nDescribe:\n•\tHow your solution addresses the business problem described in this PME\n•\tKey differentiators\n•\tTypical deployment model\n•\tTypical implementation approach\n•\tMobile capabilities\n•\tReporting and analytics capabilities\nPlease avoid generic marketing material where possible.\n3. Architecture Statement (maximum 2 pages)\nDescribe:\n•\tWhether the solution is provided as: \no\tA single SaaS platform\no\tMultiple modules within a common platform\no\tMultiple integrated products\no\tA partially bespoke solution\n•\tAny third-party products required\n•\tAny custom development required\n•\tAny significant implementation dependencies\n4. Capability Response \nFor each requirement identify whether the capability is:\n•\tNative\n•\tConfigurable\n•\tIntegration required\n•\tCustom development required\n•\tRoadmap\n•\tNot available\nSuppliers should provide explanatory comments where appropriate.\n5. Customer Scale (maximum 2 pages)\nProvide examples of the largest customer environments currently supported, including:\n•\tNumber of sites\n•\tNumber of contractor organisations\n•\tNumber of users\n•\tGeographic footprint\n6. Commercial Model (maximum 2 pages)\nProvide high-level indicative pricing information including:\n•\tLicence model\n•\tCharging basis\n•\tTypical implementation costs\n•\tTypical support costs\n•\tTypical integration costs\nDetailed pricing is not required at this stage."
}
]
},
"initiationType": "tender"
}{
"id": "068738-2026",
"tag": [
"planning"
],
"date": "2026-07-21T14:20:25+01:00",
"ocid": "ocds-h6vhtk-06cff2",
"buyer": {
"id": "GB-COH-02366686",
"name": "SEVERN TRENT WATER LIMITED"
},
"tender": {
"id": "ocds-h6vhtk-06cff2",
"lots": [
{
"id": "1",
"status": "planning",
"hasRenewal": true,
"suitability": {
"sme": true
},
"contractPeriod": {
"endDate": "2030-06-30T23:59:59+01:00",
"startDate": "2027-07-01T00:00:00+01:00",
"maxExtentDate": "2033-06-30T23:59:59+01:00"
}
}
],
"items": [
{
"id": "1",
"relatedLot": "1",
"deliveryAddresses": [
{
"region": "UKC",
"country": "GB",
"countryName": "United Kingdom"
},
{
"region": "UKD",
"country": "GB",
"countryName": "United Kingdom"
},
{
"region": "UKE",
"country": "GB",
"countryName": "United Kingdom"
},
{
"region": "UKF",
"country": "GB",
"countryName": "United Kingdom"
},
{
"region": "UKG",
"country": "GB",
"countryName": "United Kingdom"
},
{
"region": "UKH",
"country": "GB",
"countryName": "United Kingdom"
},
{
"region": "UKI",
"country": "GB",
"countryName": "United Kingdom"
},
{
"region": "UKJ",
"country": "GB",
"countryName": "United Kingdom"
},
{
"region": "UKK",
"country": "GB",
"countryName": "United Kingdom"
}
],
"additionalClassifications": [
{
"id": "48000000",
"scheme": "CPV",
"description": "Software package and information systems"
}
]
}
],
"title": "Digital Contractor Control of Work Platform",
"status": "planning",
"legalBasis": {
"id": "2023/54",
"uri": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/54/contents",
"scheme": "UKPGA"
},
"description": "Preliminary Market Engagement\nDigital Contractor Control of Work Platform\nBackground\nSevern Trent Water is seeking information from the market regarding SaaS solutions capable of digitising and governing the lifecycle of contractor management and work authorisation activities.\nCurrent processes are fragmented across email, spreadsheets, SharePoint, paper records and localised working practices. There are opportunities to improve visibility, consistency, auditability and operational efficiency.\nThe organisation wishes to understand the maturity of the market and identify potential SaaS solutions that could support a future procurement exercise.\nThis market engagement is not a call for competition, invitation to tender or commitment to procure.\nBusiness Problem\nSevern Trent requires a solution that provides consistent governance and visibility over contractor activities occurring across operational sites and facilities.\nThe organisation seeks to:\n•\tImprove contractor governance and compliance\n•\tDigitise contractor work authorisation processes\n•\tReduce administrative effort\n•\tImprove management visibility\n•\tStrengthen auditability\n•\tImprove consistency across business units\n•\tImprove efficiency by digitising manual processes\n•\tMaintain a clear record of contractor competence, approvals and activities\nScope\nThe scope may include:\n•\tWastewater operations\n•\tWater operations\n•\tBio Resources\n•\tProperty\n•\tOther operational business functions\nSuppliers should identify whether their platform can support deployment across multiple business units using common workflows whilst maintaining local operational flexibility.\nExisting Business Processes\nThe organisation currently operates contractor governance and work authorisation processes which include:\n•\tContractor approvals\n•\tSite attendance acceptance\n•\tWork authorisation\n•\tRAMS review\n•\tPermit controls\nDesired Outcomes\nThe solution should provide:\n1. Contractor Governance\nThe ability to maintain a central contractor repository containing:\n•\tContractor information\n•\tCompetency records\n•\tInsurance information\n•\tAccreditation records\n•\tAuthorisations\n•\tExpiry management\n•\tSupporting documentation\n2. Work Authorisation\nThe ability to:\n•\tReceive contractor work requests\n•\tReview and approve requests\n•\tApply site-specific controls\n•\tCommunicate site hazards\n•\tAuthorise work\n•\tTrack work status\n•\tClose activities\n3. RAMS Management\nThe ability to:\n•\tReceive RAMS submissions\n•\tReview and approve RAMS\n•\tReject and request amendments\n•\tVersion control submissions\n•\tMaintain an audit trail\n4. Permit Management\nThe ability to:\n•\tCreate permits\n•\tApprove permits\n•\tTrack permits\n•\tClose permits\n•\tView current and historical permits\n•\tSupport a variety of permit types\nExamples may include:\n•\tHot works\n•\tConfined space\n•\tExcavations\n•\tElectrical work\n•\tContractor work authorisations\n5. Visibility and Control\nThe ability to:\n•\tView current activities\n•\tView future planned activities\n•\tView historical activities\n•\tReport on contractor performance\n•\tReport on compliance activity\n•\tIdentify conflicting activities\n6. Auditing and Assurance\nThe ability to:\n•\tRecord audits\n•\tRecord inspections\n•\tRecord assurance activities\n•\tTrack actions\n•\tMaintain full audit trails\n7. Mobility\nThe solution should support:\n•\tMobile devices\n•\tOperational users\n•\tContractors\n•\tRemote working\n•\tField-based approvals\nNon-Functional Requirements\nSuppliers should comment on:\n•\tSaaS deployment model\n•\tUK hosting options\n•\tCyber security accreditations\n•\tIdentity management\n•\tSingle Sign-On\n•\tZero Trust Architecture\n•\tAPI capability\n•\tData export capability\n•\tBusiness continuity\n•\tDisaster recovery\n•\tMobile capability\n•\tOffline working\n•\tAccessibility\nSuppliers are not expected to understand current process names or terminology.\nInstead, suppliers should explain:\nHow their product would support:\n•\tRepeat contractor authorisations\n•\tSite-specific approval processes\n•\tWork authorisation workflows\n•\tContractor governance\n•\tPermit-to-work processes\nwithout requiring bespoke development.\nSolution Architecture\nSuppliers should describe their proposed solution architecture and indicate whether the capabilities described in this PME are delivered through:\n•\tA single SaaS platform\n•\tMultiple integrated modules within a common platform\n•\tMultiple products requiring integration\n•\tCustom-developed functionality\n•\tThird-party partner products\nSevern Trent recognises that these capabilities may not necessarily be delivered through a single product.\nSuppliers should clearly identify:\n•\tWhich capabilities are native\n•\tWhich capabilities require configuration\n•\tWhich capabilities require integration\n•\tWhich capabilities require custom development\nResponses should explain any implementation, support, licensing or operational implications arising from the proposed architecture.\nSuppliers should describe the largest customer environments currently supported by their platform, including:\n•\tNumber of sites\n•\tNumber of contractor organisations\n•\tNumber of users\n•\tGeographic coverage\nSupplier Response Instructions\nSupplier responses must be submitted through SAP Business Network.\nResponses should be concise and focused on the requirements described in this PME.\nResponses should comprise:\n1. Supplier Overview (maximum 2 pages)\nPlease provide:\n•\tCompany name\n•\tProduct name(s)\n•\tHeadquarters location\n•\tApproximate number of employees\n•\tRelevant industry sectors served\n•\tUtility sector experience\n•\tWater sector experience\n•\t\n•\t2. Solution Overview (maximum 5 pages)\nDescribe:\n•\tHow your solution addresses the business problem described in this PME\n•\tKey differentiators\n•\tTypical deployment model\n•\tTypical implementation approach\n•\tMobile capabilities\n•\tReporting and analytics capabilities\nPlease avoid generic marketing material where possible.\n3. Architecture Statement (maximum 2 pages)\nDescribe:\n•\tWhether the solution is provided as: \no\tA single SaaS platform\no\tMultiple modules within a common platform\no\tMultiple integrated products\no\tA partially bespoke solution\n•\tAny third-party products required\n•\tAny custom development required\n•\tAny significant implementation dependencies\n4. Capability Response \nFor each requirement identify whether the capability is:\n•\tNative\n•\tConfigurable\n•\tIntegration required\n•\tCustom development required\n•\tRoadmap\n•\tNot available\nSuppliers should provide explanatory comments where appropriate.\n5. Customer Scale (maximum 2 pages)\nProvide examples of the largest customer environments currently supported, including:\n•\tNumber of sites\n•\tNumber of contractor organisations\n•\tNumber of users\n•\tGeographic footprint\n6. Commercial Model (maximum 2 pages)\nProvide high-level indicative pricing information including:\n•\tLicence model\n•\tCharging basis\n•\tTypical implementation costs\n•\tTypical support costs\n•\tTypical integration costs\nDetailed pricing is not required at this stage.",
"specialRegime": [
"utilities"
],
"aboveThreshold": true,
"mainProcurementCategory": "goods"
},
"parties": [
{
"id": "GB-COH-02366686",
"name": "SEVERN TRENT WATER LIMITED",
"roles": [
"buyer"
],
"address": {
"region": "UKG33",
"country": "GB",
"locality": "Coventry",
"postalCode": "CV1 2LZ",
"countryName": "United Kingdom",
"streetAddress": "Severn Trent Centre"
},
"details": {
"url": "http://www.severntrent.com",
"classifications": [
{
"id": "privateUtility",
"scheme": "UK_CA_TYPE",
"description": "Private utility"
}
]
},
"identifier": {
"id": "02366686",
"scheme": "GB-COH"
},
"contactPoint": {
"name": "Jason Luck",
"email": "Jason.Luck@severntrent.co.uk"
},
"additionalIdentifiers": [
{
"id": "PQQN-5222-QDXR",
"scheme": "GB-PPON"
}
]
}
],
"language": "en",
"planning": {
"documents": [
{
"id": "068738-2026",
"url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/068738-2026",
"format": "text/html",
"noticeType": "UK2",
"description": "Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender",
"documentType": "marketEngagementNotice",
"datePublished": "2026-07-21T14:20:25+01:00"
}
],
"milestones": [
{
"id": "engagement",
"type": "engagement",
"status": "scheduled",
"dueDate": "2026-09-01T23:59:59+01:00",
"description": "Preliminary Market Engagement\nDigital Contractor Control of Work Platform\nBackground\nSevern Trent Water is seeking information from the market regarding SaaS solutions capable of digitising and governing the lifecycle of contractor management and work authorisation activities.\nCurrent processes are fragmented across email, spreadsheets, SharePoint, paper records and localised working practices. There are opportunities to improve visibility, consistency, auditability and operational efficiency.\nThe organisation wishes to understand the maturity of the market and identify potential SaaS solutions that could support a future procurement exercise.\nThis market engagement is not a call for competition, invitation to tender or commitment to procure.\nBusiness Problem\nSevern Trent requires a solution that provides consistent governance and visibility over contractor activities occurring across operational sites and facilities.\nThe organisation seeks to:\n•\tImprove contractor governance and compliance\n•\tDigitise contractor work authorisation processes\n•\tReduce administrative effort\n•\tImprove management visibility\n•\tStrengthen auditability\n•\tImprove consistency across business units\n•\tImprove efficiency by digitising manual processes\n•\tMaintain a clear record of contractor competence, approvals and activities\nScope\nThe scope may include:\n•\tWastewater operations\n•\tWater operations\n•\tBio Resources\n•\tProperty\n•\tOther operational business functions\nSuppliers should identify whether their platform can support deployment across multiple business units using common workflows whilst maintaining local operational flexibility.\nExisting Business Processes\nThe organisation currently operates contractor governance and work authorisation processes which include:\n•\tContractor approvals\n•\tSite attendance acceptance\n•\tWork authorisation\n•\tRAMS review\n•\tPermit controls\nDesired Outcomes\nThe solution should provide:\n1. Contractor Governance\nThe ability to maintain a central contractor repository containing:\n•\tContractor information\n•\tCompetency records\n•\tInsurance information\n•\tAccreditation records\n•\tAuthorisations\n•\tExpiry management\n•\tSupporting documentation\n2. Work Authorisation\nThe ability to:\n•\tReceive contractor work requests\n•\tReview and approve requests\n•\tApply site-specific controls\n•\tCommunicate site hazards\n•\tAuthorise work\n•\tTrack work status\n•\tClose activities\n3. RAMS Management\nThe ability to:\n•\tReceive RAMS submissions\n•\tReview and approve RAMS\n•\tReject and request amendments\n•\tVersion control submissions\n•\tMaintain an audit trail\n4. Permit Management\nThe ability to:\n•\tCreate permits\n•\tApprove permits\n•\tTrack permits\n•\tClose permits\n•\tView current and historical permits\n•\tSupport a variety of permit types\nExamples may include:\n•\tHot works\n•\tConfined space\n•\tExcavations\n•\tElectrical work\n•\tContractor work authorisations\n5. Visibility and Control\nThe ability to:\n•\tView current activities\n•\tView future planned activities\n•\tView historical activities\n•\tReport on contractor performance\n•\tReport on compliance activity\n•\tIdentify conflicting activities\n6. Auditing and Assurance\nThe ability to:\n•\tRecord audits\n•\tRecord inspections\n•\tRecord assurance activities\n•\tTrack actions\n•\tMaintain full audit trails\n7. Mobility\nThe solution should support:\n•\tMobile devices\n•\tOperational users\n•\tContractors\n•\tRemote working\n•\tField-based approvals\nNon-Functional Requirements\nSuppliers should comment on:\n•\tSaaS deployment model\n•\tUK hosting options\n•\tCyber security accreditations\n•\tIdentity management\n•\tSingle Sign-On\n•\tZero Trust Architecture\n•\tAPI capability\n•\tData export capability\n•\tBusiness continuity\n•\tDisaster recovery\n•\tMobile capability\n•\tOffline working\n•\tAccessibility\nSuppliers are not expected to understand current process names or terminology.\nInstead, suppliers should explain:\nHow their product would support:\n•\tRepeat contractor authorisations\n•\tSite-specific approval processes\n•\tWork authorisation workflows\n•\tContractor governance\n•\tPermit-to-work processes\nwithout requiring bespoke development.\nSolution Architecture\nSuppliers should describe their proposed solution architecture and indicate whether the capabilities described in this PME are delivered through:\n•\tA single SaaS platform\n•\tMultiple integrated modules within a common platform\n•\tMultiple products requiring integration\n•\tCustom-developed functionality\n•\tThird-party partner products\nSevern Trent recognises that these capabilities may not necessarily be delivered through a single product.\nSuppliers should clearly identify:\n•\tWhich capabilities are native\n•\tWhich capabilities require configuration\n•\tWhich capabilities require integration\n•\tWhich capabilities require custom development\nResponses should explain any implementation, support, licensing or operational implications arising from the proposed architecture.\nSuppliers should describe the largest customer environments currently supported by their platform, including:\n•\tNumber of sites\n•\tNumber of contractor organisations\n•\tNumber of users\n•\tGeographic coverage\nSupplier Response Instructions\nSupplier responses must be submitted through SAP Business Network only at https://portal.us.bn.cloud.ariba.com/dashboard/public/appext/comsapsbncdiscoveryui#/RfxEvent/preview/1110019370?anId=ANONYMOUS\nOr navigate directly to SAP Business Network and search \n\"Digital Contractor Control of Work Platform\", \"ID - 1110019370\" or \"Doc3232950799\". If you experience an issue with SAP Business Network contact SAP in the first instance.\nResponses should be concise and focused on the requirements described in this PME.\nResponses should comprise:\n1. Supplier Overview (maximum 2 pages)\nPlease provide:\n•\tCompany name\n•\tProduct name(s)\n•\tHeadquarters location\n•\tApproximate number of employees\n•\tRelevant industry sectors served\n•\tUtility sector experience\n•\tWater sector experience\n•\t\n•\t2. Solution Overview (maximum 5 pages)\nDescribe:\n•\tHow your solution addresses the business problem described in this PME\n•\tKey differentiators\n•\tTypical deployment model\n•\tTypical implementation approach\n•\tMobile capabilities\n•\tReporting and analytics capabilities\nPlease avoid generic marketing material where possible.\n3. Architecture Statement (maximum 2 pages)\nDescribe:\n•\tWhether the solution is provided as: \no\tA single SaaS platform\no\tMultiple modules within a common platform\no\tMultiple integrated products\no\tA partially bespoke solution\n•\tAny third-party products required\n•\tAny custom development required\n•\tAny significant implementation dependencies\n4. Capability Response \nFor each requirement identify whether the capability is:\n•\tNative\n•\tConfigurable\n•\tIntegration required\n•\tCustom development required\n•\tRoadmap\n•\tNot available\nSuppliers should provide explanatory comments where appropriate.\n5. Customer Scale (maximum 2 pages)\nProvide examples of the largest customer environments currently supported, including:\n•\tNumber of sites\n•\tNumber of contractor organisations\n•\tNumber of users\n•\tGeographic footprint\n6. Commercial Model (maximum 2 pages)\nProvide high-level indicative pricing information including:\n•\tLicence model\n•\tCharging basis\n•\tTypical implementation costs\n•\tTypical support costs\n•\tTypical integration costs\nDetailed pricing is not required at this stage."
}
]
},
"initiationType": "tender"
}