West Oxfordshire District Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: Local-authority-districtNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACYLocal authoritySouth East EnglandWitney

Official UK PPONPZVW-3997-TQJG

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed.

Notices, last 12 months42+600% vs prior 12 months (6)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot250% single-bid · 6 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share18%of 39 awarded procedures · 35 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

39 awarded tenders, 35 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months76 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published award value, 24m£177mnet · on 42 of 44 single-supplier awards · top 5 = 93%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 48 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract 98% (47 notices)
  • Framework 2% (1 notices)
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted 35% (17 notices)
  • Open 31% (15 notices)
  • Route not published 19% (9 notices)
  • Direct award 15% (7 notices)
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

2robust · n=650% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from deadline to first award notice, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 5 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

25 daysrobust · n=5
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 48 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

010 of 48 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 4 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

17.8% below estimatemoderate · n=4

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
IPL PLASTICS (UK) LIMITED37.7%339 Jun 2026
Trustmarque Solutions Ltd25.1%221 Jun 2026
GSM Ltd25.1%2222 Oct 2025
Reed Talent Solutions25.1%2229 Jan 2026
EZ Charge Limited12.6%151 Apr 2026
AECOM LIMITED12.6%1127 Mar 2026
Softcat Plc12.6%112 Feb 2026
Connected Kerb Limited12.6%111 Apr 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 18% of 39 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 35 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards — not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£177mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 42 of 44 single-supplier awards; the five largest make 93%; a further 1 published a VAT-inclusive amount only (£25k inc. VAT, kept apart).
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

What one of this buyer’s contracts is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£53k middle valuerobust · n=42Middle half £35k–£176k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
OXLEVI – EV Charging InfrastructureConnected Kerb Limited——£95,000,000 †
OXLEVI – EV Charging InfrastructureEZ Charge Limited——£22,415,845 †
Oxfordshire Local EV InfrastructureEZ Charge Limited——£16,603,269 †
OXLEVI – EV Charging InfrastructureEZ Charge Limited——£15,943,357 †
OXLEVI – EV Charging InfrastructureEZ Charge Limited——£14,226,967 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published end dates only · 22 of 42 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 49 of 49 procedures on this authority cluster, incl. beneficiary and procuring-entity roles

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
CCS RM6168 Framework call off contract with CBRE Ltd for Marriotts Walk Strategic Asset Management Services programmeFrameworkLand management servicesAwarded / complete26 Jan 2026—
Installation of solar PV systemAwarded / complete22 Oct 2025—
Tools for Tomorrow - Increasing career pathways into Construction & TradesEducation and training servicesAwarded / complete1 Sept 2025£12,500
Installation of PV system at Carterton Leisure CentreAwarded / complete28 Jul 2025—
Repairs to multiple roof areas to Carterton Leisure CentreAwarded / complete28 Jul 2025—
Construction and installation of new flat roof to the Town centre shop, WitneyAwarded / complete28 Jul 2025—
Operation and Management of the Charter markets in Witney and Chipping NortonBusiness and management consultancy and related servicesAwarded / complete23 Jul 2025£54,600
Insulation removal works at ElmfieldAwarded / complete18 Jul 2025—
Move on/Next Steps Support at Old Court HouseHousing servicesOpen27 May 2021£195,000

Search all 49 procedures for this authority →

Data coverage & method
  • Source: Find a Tender OCDS releases; mixed PCR 2015 / Procurement Act 2023 history — no legal-regime label is applied.
  • Counts are procedures (one notice family), not lots. Authority cluster = canonical buyer plus beneficiary and procuring-entity roles.
  • Published procedure values exist on a minority of notices; their lifetime sum (£809k, ceilings stripped) is a catalogue fact, not spend, and is not shown as a headline.
  • Awards on procedures published in the last 24 months: 44 award records on 39 procedures (44 to a single canonical supplier, 0 multi-supplier). 35 values come from the contract record when the award carried none; 1 awards published only a VAT-inclusive amount and are counted but not valued.
  • Bid counts, deadline-to-award, amendments and award-vs-estimate come from the nightly buyer analytics row; each figure’s own method and sample is behind its , the long form on Methodology.
  • Contract end dates: 22 of 42 published contracts carry a period end; 7 end within 18 months, 6 within 6.
  • Never shown: contact details, predicted winners, payment behaviour, or “who to invite”.
Identifiers consolidated into this page (4 historical Find a Tender publication identifiers)

Official notices referenced this authority under these publication identifiers. Alias URLs are not separate pages.

GB-COH-31017709GB-FTS-172539GB-FTS-172787GB-FTS-17734

Canonical page id: GB-PPON-PZVW-3997-TQJG